近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
monmonlee
註冊: 2005-07-07
上載我的肖像
|
想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
x1.6, kit lens 不夠wide, 可有其他介紹
|
|
|
|
 |
elementary user
註冊: 2005-07-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
buy EFs 10-22mm la~~~~~`
|
|
|
|
 |
tunster
註冊: 2003-10-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
你無0野呀...邊個話 kit lens 唔夠 wide? 睇下你點 frame 0者. 冇規定話一定要 Wide 爆先可以影風景
http://www.hardwarezoom.com/antony/la/index.html
我都係用 kit lens + 75-300 同 A80 喳
|
|
|
|
 |
elementary user
註冊: 2005-07-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
...................
use Fisheye lens la~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
 |
dixonkwok
註冊: 2002-11-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
I had Canon EF-S 10-22 and used it in Australia Sydney. It captures all the scenes and even your own feet. Optical quality is the best so far for the range. I can combine it with my good old 28-70mm Canon lens especially on traveling.
Anti-flare is very good that I can shoot with the sun included without image quality degradation.
Still, it is hard to frame and need slim UV or polarisation to avoid vignetting.
|
|
|
|
 |
leepsj
註冊: 2005-06-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
kit lenses 18 - 55 is not bad either!
|
|
|
|
 |
kanji
註冊: 2002-11-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
100%絕對支持tunster兄
有好人認為lens 要夠wide,最好wide到10mm等等影出來d相先致夠勁
呢個觀念係大錯特錯, 如果唔識構圖唔識frame位, 比支10mm 你出來都係同支35mm無分別, 如果你識frame位, 一支24mm已經好好用, 更何況kit lens 有18mm.
用到10~22mm 的wide鏡, 有以下三個問題在構圖時要考慮的:
1. 四邊変形問題. 由於物理特性的關係, 無論點靚的wide 鏡多少都有此問題.
2. 主體的放置的位置的構圖問題. 去到10mm的超廣角鏡時, 會把中央的東西変得更細, 所以主體如果放於中央,則要注意size可能縮得很細(作品就変得沒有了主體), 放於則邊,又要注意変形的問題.
3. 攝影的角度問題, 正如上面提過的, 如果只是拿支10~22mm的wide鏡, 用一個普通的角度拍攝的話, 出來的效果可能同支24或34mm無分別.到時一支6千多元的super wide鏡, 在用家的地位就會下降, 最後的命運就是, 放在dcfever的二手市場用7折的價格賣出吐現了(此個案之前多的是).
所以wide唔wide並非主要影響by 鏡及器材, 主要 影響by 自己技術!!!!
技術好的, 用一支24mm 什致28mm都可以用得出神入化, 如果沒有技術,用支10mm都無用,與期一路心思想upgrade器材, 不如想想如何更upgrade 技術.器材如何upgrade都係有限,且花費巨大, 但技術, 創意是無限的, 且不用花費.
這只是小弟有感而發, 言論過激請諒.
|
|
|
|
 |
beibei
註冊: 2003-08-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
Taking this opportunity, I have a silly question to ask. I have a Canon 28-70mm and 70-200mm L-series Canon Lens. I suppose to buy a 350D kit set, a friend told me that the conventional lens are not affect by the 1.6X. If it is true, then I may buy the 350D body only!
Because from my first consideration, all the Canon lens will be affected by the 1.6X factor! Without the kit lens 18-55mm, I am afraid some photos will not be wide enough.
Please advise.
Thanks and correct me if I am wrong!
|
|
|
|
 |
ngwailung
註冊: 2004-04-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 想用350D影風景應用什麼wide鏡? Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
beiobei,
Actually, you are right. Your lens will become 45-112mm and 112-320mm if used on a 350D. That's why Canon produced a new line of EF-S lens:
Kit lens 18-55mm will become 28.8-88mm which is a general purpose walkaround lens;
EF-S 17-85mm IS USM is also a general purpose walkaround lens equivalent to 28-136mm in full frame camera;
EF-S 10-22mm USM is equivalent to 16-35mm in full frame camera.
Well, you may found that you save some money in buying tele lens due to the 1.6x factor, e.g. you do not need to buy a 300mm lens since your 70-200mm will already be suitable.
|
|
|
|
 |
|