上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
ronch3c
註冊: 2009-01-11
上載我的肖像
|
定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 25 日 |
|
|
很多朋友都話定焦鏡影出, 有無ching可以講吓有什麼大分別呢? 我是新手, 現想買鏡, 想參考多點如何進手, 多謝幫忙.
|
|
|
|
 |
kit0901m
註冊: 2009-03-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 25 日 |
|
|
鏡片越少越好,變焦鏡因為多了一組鏡片用來變焦,質素些些
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 25 日 |
|
|
Zoom lens is compromising the overall focal length...........
Therefore even a very good L zoom lens say 24-70 cannot be as sharp as a cheap cheap prime 50 1.8 at the same aperture.
|
|
|
|
 |
wesleyyau
註冊: 2009-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 25 日 |
|
|
最大影響係變形... 同一焦距例如24L/50L 同24-70 o既24/50mm比較... 變形o係一定勁d... 當然standard range相差會比較輕微... 但係wide鏡同tele 都會出現比較大o既分野...
另外定焦可以做到比zoom lens 更大o既光圈... 一般o黎講鏡頭最佳成像係o係最光大圈收2-3級... 咁相對同一光圈下定焦o既質素係更高...
定焦需要自己移前移後去幫助構圖冇zoom lens 咁方便...
想玩o下可以入支50.8 ($6xx)... 認真玩一段時間... 感受o下定焦適唔適合你...
|
|
|
|
 |
felix_lung
註冊: 2003-07-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 25 日 |
|
|
無貨.
|
|
|
|
 |
ronch3c
註冊: 2009-01-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
多謝多位ching, 我會再試吓影吓比較..
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
One more thing that differ when I use 定焦VS變焦
變焦 ~ I will keep turning the zoom ring to try to get a better construction, but finally I missed the real smile from humans
定焦 ~ I get used to the angle of view and limitation of particular a.o.v . Then I know where my position should be and only move one to two steps. I can get more touching moment especially when people smile truely.
|
|
|
|
 |
pkpartner
註冊: 2006-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
同意樓上講法 定焦小嘢搞就會小嘢諗 行兩步實快過扭嚟扭去 特別係當你用嚟習慣咗同一焦距你會好容易構圖 影出嚟有意想唔到既效果
當然有情況會定焦好而有情況會變焦好-如catwalk你總不能行前行後
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
<<當然有情況會定焦好而有情況會變焦好-如catwalk你總不能行前行後>>
yes......
My understanding is that prime is very good for standard to wide. Few steps could change your view. But tele lens shot is not an easy task in using prime unless you know what to take and distance is quite fixed and well known to you......tele zoom say 100-400 would be easier if you don't get used to the focal length
with prime
Concern ~ you can't step further
Birds ~ the lake was in front of you
Lions ~ you don't want to step more closer to get a great shoot
of course if you know well what you're taking, eg. birds
you will get a 500 F4 + 1.4x
|
|
|
|
 |
pkpartner
註冊: 2006-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
我又會咁諗法 under 50mm 焦距 我會影到八成相
所以我九成鏡頭都係呢個焦距
70-200最多一成 咁一碌過咪底D囉hahaha
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
Some prime lenses, such as macro lenses, have very very high quality such as (1) very flat field (2) sharp to the edge (3) lowest dark corners (4) highest sharpness
|
|
|
|
 |
MN56
註冊: 2003-10-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
好多人常講話行前行後幾步唔使用ZOOM鏡都得。影人像就係,但影風景,唔同焦距可能要行前行後幾公里路。
|
|
|
|
 |
pkpartner
註冊: 2006-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
"好多人常講話行前行後幾步唔使用ZOOM鏡都得。影人像就係,但影風景,唔同焦距可能要行前行後幾公里路。"
你既講法係去到17mm vs 200mm既分別 講壓縮比都有分別 常講行幾步係標準鏡而言 無人用膠水痴住碌鏡同body 膠...........水呀 prime / zoom各有好處就是 而我自己出去影相唔趕時間就心情先缺 影function就一定zoom多 定焦要用多個body
|
|
|
|
 |
kit0901m
註冊: 2009-03-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 定焦VS變焦 Post time: 1 月 26 日 |
|
|
定焦鏡是可以行前行後來就,
利用交通工具 ^+++++++++^!
|
|
|
|
 |
|