1) 有很多apps可供下載，免費的、付費的，多不勝數，令手機突破框框，好。
2) 大屏幕，好。
3) 其他優點，尚待發掘！（很多功能，尚未開發！因為現在已變成“推車仔”遊戲機！）
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
1) 如很多用家意見一樣，電池很快消耗。魚與熊掌，不可兼得！
2) 金屬框邊，已刮花了！唉...
2) 金屬框邊，已刮花了！唉...
評價:
於2010年2月2日出機。主要原因，是有“推車仔（T.... F.. 的一个知名puzzle遊戲）”遊戲可下載，令我可隨時“推車仔”，忘卻工作的煩惱及壓力。
要快樂，就要付代價！出機時，選擇了無限plan，雖然貴一點，但，工作於極低谷時，偷偷上網、“推車仔”等，人也可以鬆一鬆，代價是值得的！
出機時選擇了黑色，但近來，想想：白色機也許會更“潮”一點！
出機之決定，冇錯！
要快樂，就要付代價！出機時，選擇了無限plan，雖然貴一點，但，工作於極低谷時，偷偷上網、“推車仔”等，人也可以鬆一鬆，代價是值得的！
出機時選擇了黑色，但近來，想想：白色機也許會更“潮”一點！
出機之決定，冇錯！
優點:
手机挂断电话时的反应灵敏，手机的操控性优良。
缺點:
主要缺点：
1、没有电话录音功能；
2、没有来电过滤功能；
3、最重要的缺点就是上面这1,2点可能是iphone电话永远也不会有的功能，因为苹果公司不允许开发商的软件在手机后台运行；
4、只对gmail完美支持，对yahoomail和msn的支持性都不大好。
1、没有电话录音功能；
2、没有来电过滤功能；
3、最重要的缺点就是上面这1,2点可能是iphone电话永远也不会有的功能，因为苹果公司不允许开发商的软件在手机后台运行；
4、只对gmail完美支持，对yahoomail和msn的支持性都不大好。
評價:
对还需电话录音及来电过滤的人来讲，这是一部完美的手机。
優點:
1. 電容多點觸控
2. 反應快
3. 超過十萬個APPS
4. AGPS定點快，加上指南針，唔怕蕩失路
5. 可與GOOGLE行事曆、通訊錄、電郵同步，快捷方便
2. 反應快
3. 超過十萬個APPS
4. AGPS定點快，加上指南針，唔怕蕩失路
5. 可與GOOGLE行事曆、通訊錄、電郵同步，快捷方便
缺點:
1. 電量低。每晚返到屋企都要差過夜
2. 撞款。通街都係，實現蘋果理想，男女老少都有一部 ^.^'
3. 大部。雖然有3.5吋係好，但有時會寧願細細部拎出街就算
4. 背部係膠殼。有報告指會出現裂痕
5. 貴。雖然多功能，但16GB都要5380，值唔值見仁見智
2. 撞款。通街都係，實現蘋果理想，男女老少都有一部 ^.^'
3. 大部。雖然有3.5吋係好，但有時會寧願細細部拎出街就算
4. 背部係膠殼。有報告指會出現裂痕
5. 貴。雖然多功能，但16GB都要5380，值唔值見仁見智
評價:
剛剛係數碼台出左部iPhone 3GS 16GB，無限數據。用落後之後一個字：『爽』比起我之前任何一部電話的反應來得快，多點觸控用來放大縮小夠哂實用，仲有好多APP去加強本身既功能，例如：字典、戲院資料、天氣、報紙等等。
不過一部NETBOOK出街狂上網都係用到3個鐘，何況一部iPhone？所以電量低都係一個好嚴重既問題，每晚返到屋企都要差一差，唔嫌麻煩既話都可以接受。如果您平時唔係狂上網，只係耐不耐玩玩FB，聽下歌，都夠您用一日既
不過一部NETBOOK出街狂上網都係用到3個鐘，何況一部iPhone？所以電量低都係一個好嚴重既問題，每晚返到屋企都要差一差，唔嫌麻煩既話都可以接受。如果您平時唔係狂上網，只係耐不耐玩玩FB，聽下歌，都夠您用一日既
優點:
好多功能
缺點:
周街都係
冇3g
冇閃光燈
你唔用3個月費=其他有wi fi 的電話
冇3g
冇閃光燈
你唔用3個月費=其他有wi fi 的電話
評價:
google好過佢 因為apple係行3.幾 google 係行7.幾
加上apple 會係今年出部新apple phone
加上apple 會係今年出部新apple phone
優點:
很多可不講
缺點:
1 藍牙不可以跟其他電共享
2 Sim Card 的電話用不到
3 .打不到視像電話
4. 保養機換機
2 Sim Card 的電話用不到
3 .打不到視像電話
4. 保養機換機
評價:
天氣朝濕部iphone 出水壞
Apple 話只有加2200 換過部不會修
寫信投訴要寄到美國
很離譜
以下是我封信
Dear Apple Inc.
I had brought you iphone (iphone 3GS, 32G., white, CI-APAC, S/N 879500T93NS) on 25th Dec. 2009. Since the 16th Feb. 2010, I had put the iphone in a protective case for days. On 27th Feb. 2010, I found that the iphone was wetted. and the moisture condensed became as water droplets and accumulated in the that case, and an error massage had been shown on the screen of the iphone. I had ensured that the iphone did not placed or using in the rain or near any of the wash basin, etc. During that period of time the humidity of Hong Kong was high. (http://www.weather.gov.hk/wxinfo/pastwx/metob201002.htm)
I believe that the error massage was only due to the wetting iphone because of the humid climate. So I go to your service desk (Telecom Digital Services Ltd) for help. But your customer service had declined my story and said that iphone damage was due to liquid spill or submersion. And he insisted his opinion and charged HKD 2200 for the exchange an new item.
I did not accept your customer service ideas. For the following reasons:
1. I did not, do not and will not accept any exchange of my iphone. The item I bought, it is mine and it should be repaired and give me back.
2. I had carefully used the iphone. Your customer services wrong me that I had let the iphone being spilled or submersed in liquid simply by a test paper in the USB slot.
3. There is not any cap to seal the iphone ear phone slot and USB slot. (other brand had the caps for those slots) Your design of the product had not provided a sufficient protection against liquid or dust damaged, therefore you term of warranty is unfair.
Why Apple did not add water-proof design in iphone? It is comment sense, the open slots should be provided with caps, all cell-phone manufacturers do it, why Apple is different?
I am experiencing a manufacturer asking his customer to protect the unprotected copper part, the electrical current perhaps going through it, otherwise the manufacturer puts a testing paper to see the weather the customer had/had not submerge the iphone in any liquid. Who own that iphone? Apple Inc or Me. Did I rent a iphone from Apple or brought an iphone from apple?
Your Attitude toward customer is not so friendly. You are making all the iphone lover being in a situation, use your product, he shall protect the design fault and he should see it is as his fault.
I will look for your reply soon to me via email - ngaicheung@hotmail.com.
Yours Sincerely
Cheung Ngai
Apple 話只有加2200 換過部不會修
寫信投訴要寄到美國
很離譜
以下是我封信
Dear Apple Inc.
I had brought you iphone (iphone 3GS, 32G., white, CI-APAC, S/N 879500T93NS) on 25th Dec. 2009. Since the 16th Feb. 2010, I had put the iphone in a protective case for days. On 27th Feb. 2010, I found that the iphone was wetted. and the moisture condensed became as water droplets and accumulated in the that case, and an error massage had been shown on the screen of the iphone. I had ensured that the iphone did not placed or using in the rain or near any of the wash basin, etc. During that period of time the humidity of Hong Kong was high. (http://www.weather.gov.hk/wxinfo/pastwx/metob201002.htm)
I believe that the error massage was only due to the wetting iphone because of the humid climate. So I go to your service desk (Telecom Digital Services Ltd) for help. But your customer service had declined my story and said that iphone damage was due to liquid spill or submersion. And he insisted his opinion and charged HKD 2200 for the exchange an new item.
I did not accept your customer service ideas. For the following reasons:
1. I did not, do not and will not accept any exchange of my iphone. The item I bought, it is mine and it should be repaired and give me back.
2. I had carefully used the iphone. Your customer services wrong me that I had let the iphone being spilled or submersed in liquid simply by a test paper in the USB slot.
3. There is not any cap to seal the iphone ear phone slot and USB slot. (other brand had the caps for those slots) Your design of the product had not provided a sufficient protection against liquid or dust damaged, therefore you term of warranty is unfair.
Why Apple did not add water-proof design in iphone? It is comment sense, the open slots should be provided with caps, all cell-phone manufacturers do it, why Apple is different?
I am experiencing a manufacturer asking his customer to protect the unprotected copper part, the electrical current perhaps going through it, otherwise the manufacturer puts a testing paper to see the weather the customer had/had not submerge the iphone in any liquid. Who own that iphone? Apple Inc or Me. Did I rent a iphone from Apple or brought an iphone from apple?
Your Attitude toward customer is not so friendly. You are making all the iphone lover being in a situation, use your product, he shall protect the design fault and he should see it is as his fault.
I will look for your reply soon to me via email - ngaicheung@hotmail.com.
Yours Sincerely
Cheung Ngai
