顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
用後感 : 不是味而!
優點:
1.樓下已述，同感！
2.輕觸鍵顯示運行中Apps (Tab 8.0 長按Home 鍵才能顯示) ，實用方便。
2.輕觸鍵顯示運行中Apps (Tab 8.0 長按Home 鍵才能顯示) ，實用方便。
缺點:
1. Wifi 接收差。同一環境位置間格：Note II 四格；Tabpro 時有時無！
2. 反應遲緩有點不能接受，輕觸屏幕有時没有反應，還意為當了機！
3. 可用記憶 最多250Mb - 300Mb。要經常清埋！
2. 反應遲緩有點不能接受，輕觸屏幕有時没有反應，還意為當了機！
3. 可用記憶 最多250Mb - 300Mb。要經常清埋！
評價:
新產品總是這樣：留些空間給下個新產品改進；到下個新產品又是重複又重複再重複﹍﹍。 其實，左改進右改善，為何不是在推出之前.........？ 什麼已變得複雜了？
最後更新：2014-04-12 11:18:46
Thin and light tablet with top-tier performance
優點:
-Impressive Display where it offer vivid picture, clear and bright with good n balance contrast lv.
-Adequate performance with using Snapdragon 800 quad-core chip using four Krait 400 cores clocked at 2.3GHz. An Adreno 330 GPU and 2GB of RAM round off the package.
-Light in weight
-Useful Multiscreen function, which allows you to split the display between a range of applications. Not apply to play heavy 3D games for Mutliscreen function.
-Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4’s 8-megapixel setup is better than most of the android based tablets and it appears to be a better offering than Apple’s iPad Air; though again, more extensive testing is needed to be done.
-Adequate performance with using Snapdragon 800 quad-core chip using four Krait 400 cores clocked at 2.3GHz. An Adreno 330 GPU and 2GB of RAM round off the package.
-Light in weight
-Useful Multiscreen function, which allows you to split the display between a range of applications. Not apply to play heavy 3D games for Mutliscreen function.
-Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4’s 8-megapixel setup is better than most of the android based tablets and it appears to be a better offering than Apple’s iPad Air; though again, more extensive testing is needed to be done.
缺點:
-It doesn't feature stylus (S-pen)
-Built quality needs to be improved
-Battery life needs to be improved also (My iPad Air can run more than 10 hr while this Tabpro only last 70% of my iPad Air)
-WebEx & E-meeting are nearly useless as it requires the other party using the same series of tablet.
-Samsung's customised flip board is annoying and it may not be turned off.
-Built quality needs to be improved
-Battery life needs to be improved also (My iPad Air can run more than 10 hr while this Tabpro only last 70% of my iPad Air)
-WebEx & E-meeting are nearly useless as it requires the other party using the same series of tablet.
-Samsung's customised flip board is annoying and it may not be turned off.
評價:
I bought my Tabpro 8.4 LTE for about a week from 華x行 @$35xx and I am satisfied with it so far. I have not encountered the white dot issue as other CHings mentioned and perhaps I am just lucky one. I do not understand why some C-Hings out there keep on complaining its performance speed and they claim experiencing lagging most of the time. In my opinion, swiping and flipping around the tablet's various apps and screens felt very smooth for the most part, and launching most software took only mere seconds. To wrap it up, If you look for a thin and light tablet with top-tier performance, the Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 is no doubt a good choice.
WASTE OF MONEY
優點:
Appearance impressive....that's about all.
缺點:
Lagging 99% of the time. Only good if you are very very TIGHT budget and as another user said, better than no name Ap Liu street items.
評價:
COMPLETE waste of time and money. SAMSUNG should really should revamp this model completely and not waster consumers time
a very average tablet in all areas -- Not a hot performer despite very impressive specifications.
優點:
. largest portable screen .. 8.4 inch
. Speed 2.3 Ghz ... Very impressive in the Antutu test.
. Low price
. Speed 2.3 Ghz ... Very impressive in the Antutu test.
. Low price
缺點:
- screen colour, contrast and resolution quality not as good as my iPad retina even though the specifications were similar.
- apps for the phone is so poorly implemented that i have difficulty making calls or returning . All the icons are there, but not consistent ..poor programmers skills and lack of understanding of good user interface to take advantage of the large screen.
-Speed is average in the daily operation. Antutu score is not everything.
- apps for the phone is so poorly implemented that i have difficulty making calls or returning . All the icons are there, but not consistent ..poor programmers skills and lack of understanding of good user interface to take advantage of the large screen.
-Speed is average in the daily operation. Antutu score is not everything.
評價:
I would not recommend it if you are looking for a high quality performer.
OK, if you are looking to replace the Chinese no brand name from AP Lieu Street.
Now wondering whether to keep it or not .
OK, if you are looking to replace the Chinese no brand name from AP Lieu Street.
Now wondering whether to keep it or not .
