外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
開機快 , 外形幾好 , mon 清
舊電比起 ixus 其他機 come 用好多 , 唔使次次叉足電先出街 , 連續用幾日係咁影都無問題
舊電比起 ixus 其他機 come 用好多 , 唔使次次叉足電先出街 , 連續用幾日係咁影都無問題
缺點:
ok 重 , 防震麻麻 , 機身易花 , 無電量顯示
夜晚影果陣 - 開閃光燈又太光 唔開又超黑
中原買 $2900 - 有少少貴啦 .. 買呢部係貪佢有防震點知個防震又廢 .. 其他 d 功能好似同 750 差唔多 所以覺得有 d 貴
夜晚影果陣 - 開閃光燈又太光 唔開又超黑
中原買 $2900 - 有少少貴啦 .. 買呢部係貪佢有防震點知個防震又廢 .. 其他 d 功能好似同 750 差唔多 所以覺得有 d 貴
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
相片質素優良;
電量比相像中長, 一日拍200 張照片絕無問題;
Mon 質素好;
白平衡很準;
IS 有用;
noise control 唔錯.
電量比相像中長, 一日拍200 張照片絕無問題;
Mon 質素好;
白平衡很準;
IS 有用;
noise control 唔錯.
缺點:
機身較易花;
不支援光圈先決, 快門先決及手動曝光.
不支援光圈先決, 快門先決及手動曝光.
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
輕巧
有質感
LCD 比例剛好，清析
操作容易
起動拍攝對焦快
睇相唔使開鏡頭
防手震幾有用
用 SD
微距好清析 (看作品)
夜拍影片好清析
ISO 噪是有，但不太差 (看作品)
Made in Japan
有質感
LCD 比例剛好，清析
操作容易
起動拍攝對焦快
睇相唔使開鏡頭
防手震幾有用
用 SD
微距好清析 (看作品)
夜拍影片好清析
ISO 噪是有，但不太差 (看作品)
Made in Japan
缺點:
機邊略嫌太圓滑
左手位楂機不太方便
機面鏡頭金屬環屬光面，易花
無快門先決，無光圈先決，影夜景會較麻煩
無原裝袋
左手位楂機不太方便
機面鏡頭金屬環屬光面，易花
無快門先決，無光圈先決，影夜景會較麻煩
無原裝袋
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
1. Excellent Beautiful outlook
2. Marco is Sharp ,better than Panasonic FX01. It is wonderful clear when copy A4 paper with small font szie = 2, character
3. Battery Life OK
4. 140mm Picture is Sharp enough
5. $3000= 1G Slow Flash + Bag in UNY (for Ref.)
6. Quick respone in Focusing no matter in Indoor ,Outdoor, or Marco
(Better than Fx01 ,Casio 750) a lot in small testing condition.
7. Flash Light perform good indoor better than Casio 750
8. "Color Design" function is interesting.
2. Marco is Sharp ,better than Panasonic FX01. It is wonderful clear when copy A4 paper with small font szie = 2, character
3. Battery Life OK
4. 140mm Picture is Sharp enough
5. $3000= 1G Slow Flash + Bag in UNY (for Ref.)
6. Quick respone in Focusing no matter in Indoor ,Outdoor, or Marco
(Better than Fx01 ,Casio 750) a lot in small testing condition.
7. Flash Light perform good indoor better than Casio 750
8. "Color Design" function is interesting.
缺點:
1. Battery Life Only display when it is going to be exhausted, a litte strange design as Fx01
2. Picture has "pillow distortion" as Maro mode in 3 to 4cm distance.
3. I find One blue color dead pixel in Righ Down of LCD,pay attention
4. ISO 400 may find clearly Noise when use indoor , not as good as I expected ,and not so good compare with Casio 750.
5. Digital Marco No Meaning , very bad resolution
6. Picture Sharpness not as I expected ,sometimes may need Refocus again
7. Movie Qty not good as Casio 750,Panasonic FX01.
8. Speaker No use, but in PC sound Qty is OK.
9. If Casio 750 has Marco e.g 3, 5cm.
Casio Performance better although Casio's picture Color is Too artifical.
2. Picture has "pillow distortion" as Maro mode in 3 to 4cm distance.
3. I find One blue color dead pixel in Righ Down of LCD,pay attention
4. ISO 400 may find clearly Noise when use indoor , not as good as I expected ,and not so good compare with Casio 750.
5. Digital Marco No Meaning , very bad resolution
6. Picture Sharpness not as I expected ,sometimes may need Refocus again
7. Movie Qty not good as Casio 750,Panasonic FX01.
8. Speaker No use, but in PC sound Qty is OK.
9. If Casio 750 has Marco e.g 3, 5cm.
Casio Performance better although Casio's picture Color is Too artifical.
