上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
hoiyin19
註冊: 2008-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
如果 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 加 1.4X 打雀打蝶勉強夠嗎?
|
|
|
|
 |
jim69
註冊: 2007-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
Are you using FF or APSC body? If APSC x 1.6 = 640mm, should be enough. I just used it on my 5D to shot the moon last night, take a look there.
http://dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=556075
|
|
|
|
 |
hoiyin19
註冊: 2008-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
jim69, thanks for your info, as I'm really a beginner, not quite understand the meaning of FF or APSC, but I using 40D, what you think ? your photo is so sharp and nice !
|
|
|
|
 |
jim69
註冊: 2007-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
hoiyin,
APS-C is the CMOS size standard, it means the CMOS size is only 3/4 of 35mm film size, FF is 'full frame' which is same as 35 mm film.
40D's CMOS is APS-C standard, with EF lens, due to croped-factor, the focal length is extended with 60% longer. e.g. 100 mm on 40D will be 160 mm.
the focal length of EF100-400 on 40D will be 160 - 640 mm, it's fine.
brgds.
|
|
|
|
 |
jim69
註冊: 2007-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
alternatively, you may also consider 70-200 f2.8L or 70-200 f4L IS, both of them on 40D will be 112 to 320 mm with large aperture "2.8". If you wish to zoom more far, you may add a 1.4X or 2.0X extender.
|
|
|
|
 |
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
Very good lens.
100-400mm on 40D
|
|
|
|
 |
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 15 日 |
|
|
1.4x will reduce the picture quality of your lens.
this one by 70-200mm f4L with 1.4x on 40D
|
|
|
|
 |
hoiyin19
註冊: 2008-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 16 日 |
|
|
Thanks so many reply and information, it's very useful for me, as I already have 70 - 200mm F4L, at this moment, I'm also thinking to buy a 1.4X, according to all the information, If I buy 1.4X and 100 -400 mm, it will be a good combination, thanks everybody :-)
|
|
|
|
 |
petercyc
註冊: 2003-11-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 16 日 |
|
|
please be reminded that you have to use manual focus if using 1.4x with 100 -400 at the focal length 400mm,
|
|
|
|
 |
hoiyin19
註冊: 2008-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 17 日 |
|
|
Pls one more questions, if focus length 400mm can't use auto focus, means will have the same problems as 2.0X (as I also thinking to buy 2.0X), then 2.0X better or 1.4X better ?
|
|
|
|
 |
JSmith
註冊: 2006-07-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
用2.0X image quality差好多架啦
|
|
|
|
 |
MN56
註冊: 2003-10-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
100-400 + 1.4X will have AF if you are using 1D, 1DMK II.....etc.
|
|
|
|
 |
hoiyin19
註冊: 2008-08-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
thanks a lot for all informaiton.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gondola
註冊: 2008-08-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
但用左增距鏡畫質會差小小架喎
|
|
|
|
 |
jim69
註冊: 2007-03-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 請問 Canon 支 100 - 400 mm 掂唔掂 ? Post time: 8 月 18 日 |
|
|
其實支大白喺 40D 上以經有 160-640mm (1.6X effect),都唔洗用 extender 啦!
|
|
|
|
 |
|