上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
ting0112
註冊: 2004-09-21
上載我的肖像
|
A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
邊支好???
|
|
|
|
 |
pf_leung2003
註冊: 2009-01-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
must be Canon 17-40mm
|
|
|
|
 |
ting0112
註冊: 2004-09-21
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
thx...
|
|
|
|
 |
wesleyyau
註冊: 2009-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
樓主其實想知邊方面好呢?
sharpness? color? range? aperture? bokeh? 好多好多o野喎...
有一樣17-40 一定好d 就係個圈o既顏色... =p
除o左色水... 外型... 對焦聲音/速度外...
ching 覺得17-40有邊方面優勝? 請指教.
17mm
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?FLI=0&API=0&Lens=100&FLIComp=0&APIComp=2&LensComp=400&CameraComp=474&SampleComp=0&Camera=474
35mm
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=100&Camera=474&Sample=0&FLI=4&API=0&LensComp=400&CameraComp=474&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=2&APIComp=2
|
|
|
|
 |
kenanet
註冊: 2009-07-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
it seen A16 sharpness woo !
|
|
|
|
 |
benny_c23
註冊: 2007-12-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
17-40L x 2
|
|
|
|
 |
bzboy
註冊: 2007-08-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 14 日 |
|
|
A16 just the motor sound is large. If ching accepted no problem.
Go ahead to use. Otherwise 17-40 is better.
|
|
|
|
 |
petercyc
註冊: 2003-11-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 15 日 |
|
|
And A16 AF is slower, especially at dark area.
If it is not the problem, then A16 ( f/2.8 is really cool )
|
|
|
|
 |
viovanda
註冊: 2009-02-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
A16
|
|
|
|
 |
BenYC
註冊: 2006-04-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
I have both. A16 is better for general purpose.
17-40L is a pretty bad lens as is not sharp. I only use it on FF for the ultra wide need in rare occassions.
|
|
|
|
 |
kencheng72
註冊: 2005-04-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
I have both lens, I can share my feedback as follows.
A16 upside
Selling price is about half of Canon 17-40
You can find 5 years warranty from some store
Very sharp under sun night
Range is better than Canon17-40
A16 downside
Focus speed is slower (sometimes it is just too slow)
The picture color is not as warm as L lens
|
|
|
|
 |
peterlam199477
註冊: 2010-01-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
17-40mm
1. 有USM 用開普通鏡感覺正到爆,快而無聲,不經不覺間已對焦 好大程度因為USM而買
2. 鏡身好靚,刻字等感覺皆良好
3. 送蓮花形遮光罩,少有
4. 因為快,手感好,所以影snap好好用
5. 唔怕佢入水,落雨你就知有幾好
6. 好黑都對焦得好快(唔知關唔關部機事-用400D)
7. 最抵的L-鏡, $5250@ 鐳射
8. 新手的我亦能感到其畫質的分別
9. 全時對焦(對完之後可再轉動對焦環)好好玩,但其實暫時實際作用不大
10. 有無限遠對焦刻度
|
|
|
|
 |
photowing
註冊: 2010-02-11
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=100&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=400&CameraComp=474&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3
樓主自己睇下比較下
我見canon支17-40收到5.6都ok
當收到8以經好利
A16就一般
除非你想要2.8
如果畫質先诀就一定係canon
不過c17-40同A16都唔同價位
1支有防塵防雨水L鏡有升無減小3元之1
要比都揾支(B005)比
|
|
|
|
 |
BenYC
註冊: 2006-04-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: A16 or Canon 17-40mm Post time: 2 月 17 日 |
|
|
Thanks for the interesting site. Very informative.
Before comparing, one need one to set both camera setting to 50D to make the result meaningful. Plus, I always like Tamron color better as Canon color is too warm most of the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
|