Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS (已停產)

又平又輕
唔駛俾人覺得揹住支大炮出街
配400D range 係88-400
近近地可以影下雀仔

好似真係無乜......
只可以怪佢1680 做唔到 一萬幾千o既大光圈效果
tele F/5.6 真係唔好o係演唱會影得好好

好方便，影野隨心，個range 好
做唔到大光圈的效果，但用心去影，一樣可以影得好好

輕, 平, 收細一級光圈成象不俗,

UD 鏡片應記一功~!

手感有點膠唔紮實~

唔係內對焦, + 伸縮鏡

呢支鏡確實好抵買, 不論入門或中級對於機動性主義者確係不二之選~!

輕巧
價錢平
對焦速度快

自己覺得無 =]

細路係岩岩接觸左攝影三個月..依支係第一支既鏡頭(唔計KIT鏡)

因為技術未夠道行..所以本身都唔敢買鏡頭既...一來D鏡頭真係貴...支支都成四,五千

仲要買左返黎如果"唔識用"咁咪白白浪費支鏡?

加上自己岩岩出黎技身社會..資金實在有限

咁岩最鄗睇到CANON出依支鏡頭...真係對我依D"清貧攝影師"一個喜訊

二千都唔使..買左返黎好正

果焦距可以影到好近...對焦速度又快

雖然可以話依支鏡平但佢既質素絕對唔係低下

成像質數不錯.. 比預其中好.
最大賣點係 輕.同 價錢平.
佢輕你反而多帶出街...如果重.就不想拿出街..

個 Mount 係膠不太好... 硬係覺得好似玩具.

用住先..有錢搵支 70-300 代替呢支..

cheap IS
output quality good
range is good

super plastic, like a big 50/1.8
EFS
IS not really effective at 200-250mm, (becoz u using about f/5.0-5.6)
it only can work under sunny , long distance, not any darker environment.
if IS can't work usually, this lens is expensive
super plastic again even the mount

i think anyone want to choose a tele- lens
70-300IS is a better choice
pay 1500 more for a 2nd hand
or use sigma or tamron

cheap IS
output quality good
range is good

super plastic, like a big 50/1.8
EFS
IS not really effective at 200-250mm, (becoz u using about f/5.0-5.6)
it only can work under sunny , long distance, not any darker environment.
if IS can't work usually, this lens is expensive
super plastic again even the mount

i think anyone want to choose a tele- lens
70-300IS is a better choice
pay 1500 more for a 2nd hand
or use sigma or tamron