Nikon D7000

評測報告

實拍照片

1600萬像素
高ISO
雙卡

LIVE VIEW要用NIKKOR 鏡先有AF,唔支援龍仔D鏡.
紅衫軍出產QC好差

本人由D90升級.
昨天入手, 發現用TAMRON 18-270MM鏡和TAMRON 17-50MM, LIVE VIEW時不能自動對焦, 原來LIVE VIEW AUTO FOCUS只支援NIKKOR鏡, 我頂!
而不用LIVE VIEW下於AUTO FOCUS MODE用18-270MM於室內跟本對唔到焦, 要用3D FOCUS先得得地(都唔係好WORK, 叫做好D) 日光下都用得到AUTO FOCUS.
枝17-50MM就冇事, 唔用LIVE VIEW都算WORK.
本來都冧住換Q晒D鏡去NIKKOR.
點之我晒完以下文章
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=248&t=1876031&p=11

我吊,只要一用LIVE VIEW影暗野,真係發現有6-7個光點, 結果順理成章我係拎返迎部機去澤仔換.
當然唔可以退錢, 唯有加幾百蚊換部D300S
今次NIKON真係令我好好好失望

Good spec.

blue dots,
Not the orginal "Nikon" colour

This is the first nikon camera of me,
i use 450d orginally,
the reason for me to buy this camera is mainly i want to use it as video shooting,
But sone how i discoverd that some bule dots appears during shooting,
i am very disppointed..
i hope Nikon can do some thing on this

有1080P拍片
對焦快

價錢超貴
一半金屬機身
QC 有很大既弱光滿天星燥點災難問題
泰國製造

實測過幾日,操控感比以前好左。
但QC有好大問題，影夜間相就發現有燥點災難。試左有好多紅點點，外國都有好多人有同樣問題。http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=248&t=1881671&p=2

操縱好左,有以往高級的操縱,
可以用到AI lens
有拍片1080P同AF-F

貴.......夠死

操縱好左,有以往高級的操縱, 可以用到AI lens (我有所以由90->7000, 如果唔係要1080P同AF-F+USE old lens 可用90)
ios 好多人話冇90咁好....我用開under 800 所以基本上冇分別, 當然用得"黑夜之神"都要用下高ios(重要的是我冇大光圈的ZOOM lens) ,唔講咁多,唔"閒"相一定係7000好D,因為noise control very gd, "閒"相D90可能真係好D, 不過用到咁高ios的時候好多時都係講影到同影唔到....
all in all la 唔好用FX比, 唔同VENDOR 都唔好比因為定位唔同(我係NIKON FANS,不過都同意60D的返MON VERY GD, in this point better then 7000 a lot)
90比佢平, 都係咁講"如果唔係要1080P同AF-F+USE old lens 可用90" 7000唔可以講話貴,因為依家乜都貴......早買早用....
300s 都係咁講"如果唔係要1080P同AF-F 用300s la)
講多話nikon講左佢唔係90後續,係新LINE 大家要明白:D

See below.

See below.

I am reallly annoyed by those people who like to praise a product just because they have bought it! Could you honestly compare the picture quality of your camera with other models? Pls go to the Comparometer of Image-resources, and compare the pictures from D90 and D7000 side by side. You will find the picture of D7000 look worse! At ISO 1600, the pictures from D7000 looks even more grainy and dull. Yes, at higher iso it looks cleaner, but it also looks much softer. You can only say the noise reduction software is more powerful but not less noise. So many reviews have published, even the famous 黑麪 was surprised by the soft images from D7000, when compared to D5000 and D90. Pls go there to read instead of day-dreaming.

Pls face yourself honestly. Is this camera really worth above $10K for body only? Nikon is treating us like fools this time.

I have to declare that I have been a great Nikon fans. I have played various models and still own D90 (I bought it at $5500 hong good in May 2010. So cheap!). To be honest, in several months ago, I was so excited by the news and spec of D7000, and have been thinking seriously to sell away my D90, even though I just bought it for several months. But after knowing the price, reading all reviews and seeing the image samples around from D7000. I was so disappointed, and only say : "Nikon, you are kidding. "

For those still insisting their D7000 is superior, I challenge you to spend several thousands to buy a A33 or A55 from Sony (I did). Pls don't say those vague term "手感" but compare the image qualities objectively yourself. You will know how fool you are by buying D7000.. END

1. 保留了D90的快速轉換WB及ISO模式，方便易用
2. 金屬機身及15萬次快門，雖不致全機身也是金屬，但感覺上會比D90耐用
3. 一秒六張連拍雖未有機會使用，但感覺上直逼專業
4. 對焦明顯較快，對焦點選擇亦多
5. 更多濾鏡功能，讓人感覺Nikon更有誠意滿足不同用家
6. 可對應AI、AI-S鏡頭。(雖說擁有此等舊鏡的用家會抗拒使用DX的焦距裁放，可是反過來說，它可對應那目前只有AI鏡才有的F1.2鏡頭，即50mm f1.2及58mm f1.2，成為一支超大光圈人像鏡)

1. 缺少了以往D90的清脆快門聲響
2. KIT SET超貴，與淨機身售價相差二千多塊；而且18-105mm VR跟全天候機身不太匹配
3. 部份配件與D7000不同步發行，如機頂保護膜、後備電
4. 接近電池蓋位置的一個小活門容易鬆脫
5. 紅外線接收位置與上代的位置相同，如改為跟D5000一樣在手柄位置會更好
6. 不像D300s一樣有一體化的機身

由於金屬機身及15萬次快門，讓我把心一橫將D90轉換為D7000。

實測過後，總會去想它有多好。的而且確，它從裡而外也是比以往強悍，但操控感其實跟D90基本沒差。為了延續D90的經典，在D7000上加入更多的元素又是否更為討好？個人來說，只可以「網上預報太誇張」來形容。並不是它不好，基本上網上預告的，在它身上都能找到。只是說它比D300s還要強悍，這點倒是言大於實。或許換個說法，它只是追近了D300s的部份功能。

但話說回來，它的撤頭撤尾的大改進，始終是一部值得去期待的產品。至於它的好與壞，個人覺得，作為一個影者，責任是何以將手上的器材發揮得淋漓盡致，而不是去批評它有多糟糕。