利
色靚
散景正
對焦抉
大光圈
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
1.Very Sharp, for small animal & flower!!
2. Very Clear
4. very fast focus
5. Good quality
3. FF lens
4. 映遠嘢都好清
5. easy to 构圖 by using this len!!
2. Very Clear
4. very fast focus
5. Good quality
3. FF lens
4. 映遠嘢都好清
5. easy to 构圖 by using this len!!
缺點:
Heavy
2K more expensive then Sigma 105 2.8
2K more expensive then Sigma 105 2.8
評價:
I use it for half a year bought @ BoARDWAY by $6100
映微距, 一流!!!
但買時一定要認清呢支is for Micro....睇吓你多唔多用到佢嘞^^^
本人就成日用佢嘞!!
I have post some picture in 發表區by using this len..
映微距, 一流!!!
但買時一定要認清呢支is for Micro....睇吓你多唔多用到佢嘞^^^
本人就成日用佢嘞!!
I have post some picture in 發表區by using this len..
最後更新：2010-03-29 00:18:04
優點:
對焦快,利
散景討好
有VR,金圈,N
有full/0.5-無限遠,好好用
散景討好
有VR,金圈,N
有full/0.5-無限遠,好好用
缺點:
重左少少,粗左少少
貴左少少
其他暫時未發現
貴左少少
其他暫時未發現
評價:
買左幾日立刻走左轉鳳園,發現冇買錯鏡,雖然我果支MIC,只要影到靚相我吾介意
有人話佢慢喎,我吾覺,好多野都一下到,當初以60mm及105mm二選一,好彩買左105VR,後悔買得太遲
有人話佢慢喎,我吾覺,好多野都一下到,當初以60mm及105mm二選一,好彩買左105VR,後悔買得太遲
優點:
- VR works in non - macro range very well
- f2.8 good for night portrait
- have all the high end technology: IF, ED , Nano, VR
- 如果比你對到焦, 影花影物真係好正...(但真不易)
- 影大頭相 / 大半身相都好好....
- No distortion at all aperature
- the sharpest 105 lens u can find on earth
- f2.8 good for night portrait
- have all the high end technology: IF, ED , Nano, VR
- 如果比你對到焦, 影花影物真係好正...(但真不易)
- 影大頭相 / 大半身相都好好....
- No distortion at all aperature
- the sharpest 105 lens u can find on earth
缺點:
- Focus Breathing - the image size changes greatly (breathes) while focusing.
(經常走焦) 是一個很serious 的problem...
- VR does not work in close focus at all !!!!
- expensive lens that does not focus well in macro range...
- Calibrate 枝鏡都冇用
- 當你focus 唔到上面的優點 = garbage!!!!!!!!!
(經常走焦) 是一個很serious 的problem...
- VR does not work in close focus at all !!!!
- expensive lens that does not focus well in macro range...
- Calibrate 枝鏡都冇用
- 當你focus 唔到上面的優點 = garbage!!!!!!!!!
評價:
For all-around use as a general-purpose tele, this 105mm is Nikon's best yet.
However, definitely NOT for professional macro shooter ( I am a D700 user)
買來主要影花影butterfly 的, 但好多時在日光的時候, 對焦真係對到想爆粗同火都來...$*@&$
有乜理由一枝$ 6180 macro lens, 比我枝$4000 的 70-300VR 仲難對焦.... d image 變大變小, 真係想唔lun用佢....
我肯定枝枝105vr 都係咁... 因為有reviewer review 過, 我開頭都唔信... 好後知奶野.... @($*@
See extensive review here
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/105vr.htm
我真係好後悔買了這枝105vr...
早知買枝小黑六好過, 一枝=二枝... 又唔洗買70-300vr...
However, definitely NOT for professional macro shooter ( I am a D700 user)
買來主要影花影butterfly 的, 但好多時在日光的時候, 對焦真係對到想爆粗同火都來...$*@&$
有乜理由一枝$ 6180 macro lens, 比我枝$4000 的 70-300VR 仲難對焦.... d image 變大變小, 真係想唔lun用佢....
我肯定枝枝105vr 都係咁... 因為有reviewer review 過, 我開頭都唔信... 好後知奶野.... @($*@
See extensive review here
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/105vr.htm
我真係好後悔買了這枝105vr...
早知買枝小黑六好過, 一枝=二枝... 又唔洗買70-300vr...
優點:
quick response, good AF Accurancy, VR II, fine broken of background, good sharpness , good colour, nano crystal coating,
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan
缺點:
none up to now.
評價:
quick response, good AF Accurancy, VR II, fine broken of background, good sharpness , good colour, nano crystal coating,
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan
優點:
結實, well built
對焦快
VR 好有用(execpt micro)
有focus range lock
M/A (micro 有好緊要) focus ring 好順
長度fit 手, focusing ring 剛在指公位
hood 夠深
bokeh 都好creamy
對焦快
VR 好有用(execpt micro)
有focus range lock
M/A (micro 有好緊要) focus ring 好順
長度fit 手, focusing ring 剛在指公位
hood 夠深
bokeh 都好creamy
缺點:
迷焦(in some occation)
紫邊及綠邊出現在DOF外
VR好食電
小小重 on light bodies
紫邊及綠邊出現在DOF外
VR好食電
小小重 on light bodies
評價:
有人竟然一味幻想支鏡可比 f/2, f/1.8, f/1.4 鏡影人好, 又希望支鏡唔係105 micro, 而係 60, 200 micro....佢應該係貪平金圈而買....買錯鏡...可惜.
micro 隊到咁上下近支支都sharp, 我唔識比. 無限遠就真係好OK, 2.8 好靚, 唔使收
AF 快, 狠, 準到不得了, 就算影micro都省唔少時間
micro時收到 f/16, 18 都可接受, 再多就唔太好
紫邊及綠邊係最困憂問題, 所以比得4分, 而因為咁, 佢micro比較能安守本分, 做tele 就差少少.
VR比無VR食電一陪, 要帶多舊電
我覺得支鏡冇乜話用途廣唔廣, 105定焦鐘意點用就點用.
反而係支鏡幾肥仔, 非micro不可的話, 比較少帶出去用
micro 隊到咁上下近支支都sharp, 我唔識比. 無限遠就真係好OK, 2.8 好靚, 唔使收
AF 快, 狠, 準到不得了, 就算影micro都省唔少時間
micro時收到 f/16, 18 都可接受, 再多就唔太好
紫邊及綠邊係最困憂問題, 所以比得4分, 而因為咁, 佢micro比較能安守本分, 做tele 就差少少.
VR比無VR食電一陪, 要帶多舊電
我覺得支鏡冇乜話用途廣唔廣, 105定焦鐘意點用就點用.
反而係支鏡幾肥仔, 非micro不可的話, 比較少帶出去用
最後更新：2009-03-20 05:06:21
