顯示： 37 - 42 (最新發表)
優點:
平!唔使四千,比多百多元買埋uv filter當保護鏡都唔肉赤，有質感，對焦快
缺點:
桶狀頗嚴重，長焦距時有小小out focus,同埋os作用於長焦距時不顯著
評價:
有甘既焦距，又有OS,made in japan,甘既價錢重想點
優點:
唔洗淨4000，可以有防震，仲要全焦距。
缺點:
配合增距轉接鏡，200mm時，自動對焦會有偏差。
評價:
支鏡好有質感，對焦都算好快，其實，我覺得同原廠都唔差好多。咁既價錢，真係低玩，特別我係用canon mount，原廠要多一倍價錢先有得玩 IS，而且，OS鏡都有緊接舊款無OS版的性能，不過，如果有埋APO同埋USM類似的性能，咁就perfect喇，可惜，一分錢，一分貨。
優點:
Unknown
缺點:
Maximum aperture 6.3 at tele
評價:
Never use, If I were you, I prefer Nikon AFS 18-200 VR,
Sigma cost HK$4500, I prefer to offer HK$1000 more to have a Ultra Sonic Motor, 4 grade Vibration Reduction, Max. aperture 5.6 at tele.
I guess - sigma lens with 2 or 2.5 grade Vibration Reduction only
What do you think Elai C Hing
Sigma cost HK$4500, I prefer to offer HK$1000 more to have a Ultra Sonic Motor, 4 grade Vibration Reduction, Max. aperture 5.6 at tele.
I guess - sigma lens with 2 or 2.5 grade Vibration Reduction only
What do you think Elai C Hing
