紅圈做工
對焦距離近 (24cm)
色彩鮮艷
遮光罩同 24-105L及17-40L共用 (因為自己用7D)
77mm的濾鏡, 可共用於 24-105L及17-40L
顯示： 19 - 24 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
貴, 比 35 1.4 貴上2千有多
經常冇貨,買當日問過全旺角都冇貨,要去尖沙咀
近距離對焦比 24-105L及17-40L慢一點
經常冇貨,買當日問過全旺角都冇貨,要去尖沙咀
近距離對焦比 24-105L及17-40L慢一點
評價:
用在 7D 上,
之前已經有24-105L,17-40L,50.8,70-300,60 macro
因為要影小朋友 (3歲以下), 50乘1.6後約85, 距離太遠, 難吸引其注意
60 macro 有同樣問題
想過 Sigma 30 1.4 及 28 1.8
前者怕走焦, 後者評價一般
只好在 24 1.4 及 35 1.4 二選一
最後選 24 1.4 因為以下
1. 7D 係要 x1.6, 因為冇打算上 FF, 24x1.6 後約 35, 比較合適
2. 35 1.4 已經 12 年鏡, 24 1.4 08年出, coating 會比前者好
用後感
1. 始終係定焦鏡, 成像及色彩都比 24-105L及17-40L 都好
2. 影小朋友面對面都可以影全身,非常好用
3. 因為用係 7D 影風景用上 1.4 都唔會有暗方及變形
之前已經有24-105L,17-40L,50.8,70-300,60 macro
因為要影小朋友 (3歲以下), 50乘1.6後約85, 距離太遠, 難吸引其注意
60 macro 有同樣問題
想過 Sigma 30 1.4 及 28 1.8
前者怕走焦, 後者評價一般
只好在 24 1.4 及 35 1.4 二選一
最後選 24 1.4 因為以下
1. 7D 係要 x1.6, 因為冇打算上 FF, 24x1.6 後約 35, 比較合適
2. 35 1.4 已經 12 年鏡, 24 1.4 08年出, coating 會比前者好
用後感
1. 始終係定焦鏡, 成像及色彩都比 24-105L及17-40L 都好
2. 影小朋友面對面都可以影全身,非常好用
3. 因為用係 7D 影風景用上 1.4 都唔會有暗方及變形
優點:
24mm - wide 夠用 (Full Frame 機)
對焦快 , 成像夠利 , 色靚 , 樣靚
有買貴 , 無買錯 !!!!!!
對焦快 , 成像夠利 , 色靚 , 樣靚
有買貴 , 無買錯 !!!!!!
缺點:
未發覺
評價:
5D mark II 配佢 , 1 個字 - GOOD !!!
極度推薦 !!!!
極度推薦 !!!!
優點:
Good 24mm
Good photo colour
Good speed USM
No black angle
Good new WTF
Good photo colour
Good speed USM
No black angle
Good new WTF
缺點:
too big
too expensive
not wide may be 20mm is OK
too expensive
not wide may be 20mm is OK
評價:
Good 24mm
Good photo colour
Good speed USM
No black angle
Good new WTF
Good photo colour
Good speed USM
No black angle
Good new WTF
最後更新：2009-11-11 21:49:40
優點:
一貫紅圈定焦質素...防塵膠邊,變型幾乎無...對焦距離近..影食物...小作仔一流....
缺點:
有D重...
貨少.....
貨少.....
評價:
因小弟由5DII降格用1d3...不嬲鐘情35mm焦距效果,亦曾擁有過35L,其立體效果出眾,後來轉用1d3兼放出35L...改入35.2...要X1.3關係...無咗35mm效果...一直對其視覺效果念念不忘..卒之放低十三張金色牛仔換取呢支嘢..有以前小弟用35L响FF上面嘅表現...不過無咗黑角(唔知FF上有無)如果用X1.6或X1.3強烈推介此鏡...不過唔知FF上用影人會唔會效果重强D...如果ching心大心細入唔入好...入啦...正到痺...
優點:
- Sharp, extremely high resolution and clear picture
- Good depth of field (f1.4) with wide-angle, especially good for close-up with wide picture.
- Balance well with 5DII.
- Not extremely heavy as 50f1.2 and 85f1.2. Can fit well with FF or APS-C.
- Nice dust/water proof body, no more plastic feeling.
- Good depth of field (f1.4) with wide-angle, especially good for close-up with wide picture.
- Balance well with 5DII.
- Not extremely heavy as 50f1.2 and 85f1.2. Can fit well with FF or APS-C.
- Nice dust/water proof body, no more plastic feeling.
缺點:
- Experienced first time of bad quality (in last thread). But this replacement bought from Tin Cxxxxx is excellent.
- Expensive
- no other disappointment; everything is excellent
- Expensive
- no other disappointment; everything is excellent
評價:
This is a dream lens; color, image quality, resolution - everything is superb.
So far still limited stocks available in the world (not only in HK). It is one of the best lens on the 24mm prime range from all manufacturers.
Strongly recommend when you want to move to prime-lens group, from 17-40 or 16-35. Also a good choice if you get used to 24-105.
The weight of the lens make it perfect travel, and for all day-use; not heavy and excellent color, good to keep all memory in the best shape.
So far still limited stocks available in the world (not only in HK). It is one of the best lens on the 24mm prime range from all manufacturers.
Strongly recommend when you want to move to prime-lens group, from 17-40 or 16-35. Also a good choice if you get used to 24-105.
The weight of the lens make it perfect travel, and for all day-use; not heavy and excellent color, good to keep all memory in the best shape.
優點:
- Excellent Aperature at f/2.8, with good depth-of-field at f/1.4. very impressive.
- Light weight (vs. 17-40mm f4)
- One lens is enough; why do we need zoom lens anymore?
- with 5DII, 24mm can crop to 35mm/50mm/85mm equivalent of aps-c
- Extreme resolution; 20x on camera is as sharp as normal magification
- With hook, extreme professional looking
- metallic build - feel more proud (:P)
- Light weight (vs. 17-40mm f4)
- One lens is enough; why do we need zoom lens anymore?
- with 5DII, 24mm can crop to 35mm/50mm/85mm equivalent of aps-c
- Extreme resolution; 20x on camera is as sharp as normal magification
- With hook, extreme professional looking
- metallic build - feel more proud (:P)
缺點:
- How can a "L" lens has defect? It cost 13,000HKD! extremely unacceptable
- No stock in general; Man Shing has > 10 ppl on waiting list (WTF)
- Heavy duty focusing distance; focus can take up to >90 degree movement inside, quite slow compare to 17-40mm f/4
- No stock in general; Man Shing has > 10 ppl on waiting list (WTF)
- Heavy duty focusing distance; focus can take up to >90 degree movement inside, quite slow compare to 17-40mm f/4
評價:
Inside the focusing window, the micro-motor/label/etc are broken after tested 20 photos. Unbearable manufacturing quality; no matter how good the Structured-Wavelength Coating (SWC), redesign, how many UD lens used...this became a rubbish lens.
I have 17-40mm f/4 and 70-200mm f/4 used heavily with film/dslr for 7 years. Never seen such a horrible quality on "L" lens. Where is quality? Image Quality/Sharpness is not as good as Nikon already, crazy bad quality scare all Canon-fans away. providing HD-video recording is good idea: canon is now only interested in video, not still-image anymore.
Sample Images on the defect.
http://img.kakaku.com/images/Review/000/009/9158_m.jpg
http://img.kakaku.com/images/Review/000/009/9159_m.jpg
I have 17-40mm f/4 and 70-200mm f/4 used heavily with film/dslr for 7 years. Never seen such a horrible quality on "L" lens. Where is quality? Image Quality/Sharpness is not as good as Nikon already, crazy bad quality scare all Canon-fans away. providing HD-video recording is good idea: canon is now only interested in video, not still-image anymore.
Sample Images on the defect.
http://img.kakaku.com/images/Review/000/009/9158_m.jpg
http://img.kakaku.com/images/Review/000/009/9159_m.jpg
