此欄是以50.4D相比
1. G明顯較利, 尤其是在邊緣更有進步
2. G圓形波波好睇好多
3. 在高階機D的對焦速度較快
4. G的AF-S操作很靜, 爽快, 對焦準些
5. 手工同手感都是G較好, 很結實
6. G散景靚d
7. G色水好d, 顏色好出
8. G抗耀光好d, 紫邊控制好d, 色散控制好d
9. 四周失光G明顯改善
10. G跟送靚袋, 靚hood, 同埋靚rear cap
總括黎講, 除左對焦速度之外, G鏡乜都好過D鏡... 少少.
點揀好簡單, 若果要性價比高0既, 就選50.4D, 平平地就有個高質素0既大光圈玩; 若果要追求完美一步到位0既, 就選50.4G吧~
顯示： 25 - 30 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
此欄是以S50.4相比
1. S利些少
2. S的圓形波波柔和d
3. S很易走焦, 對焦不及N50.4G般予人信心
4. S的body built及用料是旗艦級
5. S太重, 太大舊, 身為50mm標準鏡, 插落FX機應該是盡量輕便取勝才對
6. S的散景再柔d靚d
7. S的色水差些, 有點偏黃, 不太自然, 不太討好
總括來說, S的某些地方會好過N50.4G少少, 我覺得贏得最多的是散景. 銳利度都不是贏太多. 發色方面我覺得還是原廠鏡比較好, 自然得黎又色濃.
而S的缺點是太大太重了, 50mm來說有點浮誇, 標準鏡不應該這麼大. 不過最大的問題卻是來自... 對焦... S的對焦真係好令人擔心, 用落Nikon機度經常唔準, 沒有信心, 又點影相呢? 呢個亦係我唔buy S的最主要原因.
1. S利些少
2. S的圓形波波柔和d
3. S很易走焦, 對焦不及N50.4G般予人信心
4. S的body built及用料是旗艦級
5. S太重, 太大舊, 身為50mm標準鏡, 插落FX機應該是盡量輕便取勝才對
6. S的散景再柔d靚d
7. S的色水差些, 有點偏黃, 不太自然, 不太討好
總括來說, S的某些地方會好過N50.4G少少, 我覺得贏得最多的是散景. 銳利度都不是贏太多. 發色方面我覺得還是原廠鏡比較好, 自然得黎又色濃.
而S的缺點是太大太重了, 50mm來說有點浮誇, 標準鏡不應該這麼大. 不過最大的問題卻是來自... 對焦... S的對焦真係好令人擔心, 用落Nikon機度經常唔準, 沒有信心, 又點影相呢? 呢個亦係我唔buy S的最主要原因.
評價:
這裏想先談談AF速度方面, 50.4G的AF-S只是一個小摩打, 在中低階機中, 鏡身小摩打及機身推AF鏡的速度分別不大, 可是在高階機上, 高階的機身推AF鏡的速度便會比AF-S小摩打自轉為快了. 這解釋了在中低階機中, G及D的對焦速度分別不大, 可是在高階機中, D鏡卻會比G鏡快些的原因了.
我一直沒有提及過價錢, 因為我支50.4G係水貨用2900左右買入(請不要問我在哪裏買, 因為呢個價依家已經買唔到).
若果以呢個價錢同S50.4比的話, 我覺得50.4G一定贏梗, 入硬呢支唔駛諗. 可惜, 依家行貨的50.4G貴到離譜要成4000... 分明係唔值呢個價, 人地S50.4係旗艦鏡啊, 50.4G充其量只是高級些的標準鏡而已, S都賣得平過你, Nikon HK會唔會離譜左少少? 所以若果要4000買支咁0既50.4G的話, 絕對唔值.
用左超過1個月, 感覺非常滿意, 大光圈, 對焦準, 輕便得黎有手感, 散景又夠靚(比起50.4D), 而且全開光圈都好利, 尤其是中央, f/1.4絕對可用, 收到f./2已經係好利(邊緣都好利), f/4.0係最利光圈, 整支鏡各方面都很完美.
總括來說, 我對支50.4G有100%的滿意(當然以我平入來說啦), 它是一個平均強的鏡, 每一項長處都能獨當一面, 並且沒有明顯的弱點. 絕對值得推介.
希望此post能幫到大家~
我一直沒有提及過價錢, 因為我支50.4G係水貨用2900左右買入(請不要問我在哪裏買, 因為呢個價依家已經買唔到).
若果以呢個價錢同S50.4比的話, 我覺得50.4G一定贏梗, 入硬呢支唔駛諗. 可惜, 依家行貨的50.4G貴到離譜要成4000... 分明係唔值呢個價, 人地S50.4係旗艦鏡啊, 50.4G充其量只是高級些的標準鏡而已, S都賣得平過你, Nikon HK會唔會離譜左少少? 所以若果要4000買支咁0既50.4G的話, 絕對唔值.
用左超過1個月, 感覺非常滿意, 大光圈, 對焦準, 輕便得黎有手感, 散景又夠靚(比起50.4D), 而且全開光圈都好利, 尤其是中央, f/1.4絕對可用, 收到f./2已經係好利(邊緣都好利), f/4.0係最利光圈, 整支鏡各方面都很完美.
總括來說, 我對支50.4G有100%的滿意(當然以我平入來說啦), 它是一個平均強的鏡, 每一項長處都能獨當一面, 並且沒有明顯的弱點. 絕對值得推介.
希望此post能幫到大家~
最後更新：2009-03-05 23:57:33
優點:
SHARP
色靚
輕身
色靚
輕身
缺點:
focus比預期慢
祖國製
貴 - 比AF50mm/1.4D貴差不多一倍
變形比1.4D略為多
祖國製
貴 - 比AF50mm/1.4D貴差不多一倍
變形比1.4D略為多
評價:
同意樓下ching意見,唔知點解用落我部D300 對焦慢. 唔單止比支24-70/2.8慢(同樣於50mm比較), 就連支有1X年o既35-80/4-5.6(無SWM)都有o的比唔上,覺得D300機身o既摩打都轉得爽過呢支鏡個SWM(同一個室內環境比較,對完遠然後對近,對完近然後對遠)
請有意買呢支鏡o既朋友記得帶埋自己部body去比較1.4D和1.4Go既對焦速度,睇下有冇我個問題
請有意買呢支鏡o既朋友記得帶埋自己部body去比較1.4D和1.4Go既對焦速度,睇下有冇我個問題
最後更新：2009-02-26 23:29:47
優點:
round ball bll effect
light weight
more saturation, (under the exact same settings on same camera, and old and new version switching back and forth,)
picture quality is quite good,
light weight
more saturation, (under the exact same settings on same camera, and old and new version switching back and forth,)
picture quality is quite good,
缺點:
not worth 4k in my opinion
slow focus on D3, hunts focus in dim light (not for the old version in same lighting conditions) what a surprise, and disapointment,
this focus draw back may not be as essential, if matched with a speed light with AF-assist, but still it is a draw back
it is not much better than the old version but is 2x the price
slow focus on D3, hunts focus in dim light (not for the old version in same lighting conditions) what a surprise, and disapointment,
this focus draw back may not be as essential, if matched with a speed light with AF-assist, but still it is a draw back
it is not much better than the old version but is 2x the price
評價:
currently using the AF50mm f1.4D for more than a year, very pleased with it, and this is the reason why I got the new one "G" lens, hoping the new will make the already superb lens better,
only find that images are deeper in saturation, (slightly, similar to going up the image setting by 1 )
also it does make rounder ball balls effect in the background
focus speed is slower on D3, comparing with 50mm f1.4D (old version)
I think it may be the reason that the D3 focus motor is faster than the AF-S motor on the lens, if any C-Hing knows the PROVED REASON to this, I really appreciate if told the truth,
I used it for 3 weeks already, but I find that I like the old one more, as focus is more prompt, I really thank my firend for getting this lens for me, it is good but not worth the 4k,
focus travel distance is about 10 percent longer than the old version, and speed is about 20 percent slower than the old lens, (feels like it)
this lens is better in some ways (stats wise) but also is not as good when focusing speed is concerned.
I dont recommand this lens if you already have the old one,
I would recommand this lens if you dont have the old one, and selling price drops, but dont wait too long, as you may waste a lot of wonderful moments while waiting,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR READING MY REVIEW, IT IS NOT SCIENTIFIC, BUT MY FEELINGS OF THIS LENS IS VERY TRUE, WHEN YOU ALSO OWN THE OLDER VERSION, THANKS AGAIN
only find that images are deeper in saturation, (slightly, similar to going up the image setting by 1 )
also it does make rounder ball balls effect in the background
focus speed is slower on D3, comparing with 50mm f1.4D (old version)
I think it may be the reason that the D3 focus motor is faster than the AF-S motor on the lens, if any C-Hing knows the PROVED REASON to this, I really appreciate if told the truth,
I used it for 3 weeks already, but I find that I like the old one more, as focus is more prompt, I really thank my firend for getting this lens for me, it is good but not worth the 4k,
focus travel distance is about 10 percent longer than the old version, and speed is about 20 percent slower than the old lens, (feels like it)
this lens is better in some ways (stats wise) but also is not as good when focusing speed is concerned.
I dont recommand this lens if you already have the old one,
I would recommand this lens if you dont have the old one, and selling price drops, but dont wait too long, as you may waste a lot of wonderful moments while waiting,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR READING MY REVIEW, IT IS NOT SCIENTIFIC, BUT MY FEELINGS OF THIS LENS IS VERY TRUE, WHEN YOU ALSO OWN THE OLDER VERSION, THANKS AGAIN
最後更新：2009-01-11 03:32:04
優點:
- Fast focus with SWM (同 14-24 2.8 一樣咁快)
- 9片光圈葉令散景好靚好靚
- 手感好過 50 1.4D
- 外觀靚o左
- Focus 好準好準 + 靜 (快狠準? XD)
- 連 hood, 正! (單買都要 200幾)
- 一貫 G 鏡轉 M/A focus, 方便~
- 9片光圈葉令散景好靚好靚
- 手感好過 50 1.4D
- 外觀靚o左
- Focus 好準好準 + 靜 (快狠準? XD)
- 連 hood, 正! (單買都要 200幾)
- 一貫 G 鏡轉 M/A focus, 方便~
缺點:
- MADE IN CHINA... (雖然某程度上我覺得唔係 MADE IN JAPAN 可能會仲好, 因為佢都唔信得過「外人」, 如日本製可能 QUALITY CHECK 10 抽 1, 外地製 10 抽 3都唔出其)
- 人地「式麻」都要 4000, 咁無理由去買副廠都唔支持正廠, 但如果呢支賣 3500 會覺得值 D...
- 其實功能上都無缺點喇, 係買o個時肉痛 d o者... 哈哈...
- 人地「式麻」都要 4000, 咁無理由去買副廠都唔支持正廠, 但如果呢支賣 3500 會覺得值 D...
- 其實功能上都無缺點喇, 係買o個時肉痛 d o者... 哈哈...
評價:
一連玩o左佢 3日, 用 D300 係咁影, focus 真係又快又準, o係屋企佢係一支「貓像鏡」, 快速 focus 好處係可以捕捉到貓貓一舉一動
影人就唔洗講啦, 收到 1.8 就已經好 sharp 好靚 (1.4 其實都好 sharp, 不過有時唔需要咁勁散景)
用黎影食物都好靚, 成像拍得住 14-24 2.8
係就係貴o左 D, 不過真係物有所值, 碌卡時肉痛一下, 到自己影完見到 d 相咁靚就乜痛都唔記得晒~
要買就真係買呢支喇, 一定唔會好似式麻咁甩漆變「迷彩鏡」
但如果你有 1.4D 的話, 又無咩必需去換 G 鏡...
影人就唔洗講啦, 收到 1.8 就已經好 sharp 好靚 (1.4 其實都好 sharp, 不過有時唔需要咁勁散景)
用黎影食物都好靚, 成像拍得住 14-24 2.8
係就係貴o左 D, 不過真係物有所值, 碌卡時肉痛一下, 到自己影完見到 d 相咁靚就乜痛都唔記得晒~
要買就真係買呢支喇, 一定唔會好似式麻咁甩漆變「迷彩鏡」
但如果你有 1.4D 的話, 又無咩必需去換 G 鏡...
優點:
afs, 9 leaf, 手感好過 d 果支, 成像同之前d果支分別唔係太大, 不過都好滿意, 等甘多年先有支afs 常用range的定蕉, 點都要俾面買下..
有跟hood 同袋仔.
有跟hood 同袋仔.
缺點:
made in china, 成4000野都係 中國做.. 心有不甘..有預感好快跌價.
主要係價錢太貴其他都ok.. 可能呢排用太多錢係marketing..:@
主要係價錢太貴其他都ok.. 可能呢排用太多錢係marketing..:@
評價:
唔錯.. 如果平多1000蚊就合理好多...
優點:
對焦快
9片光圈葉
輕巧
9片光圈葉
輕巧
缺點:
貴(對於某些人來說)
中國製造(對於某些人來說)
中國製造(對於某些人來說)
評價:
此鏡我用來影貓咪,光圈收細到2.8時已經很利,毛髮的層次感原全可以表現出來.不過考慮到我之前是用50mm1.8,所以不方便作出比較(始終等級不同),但是大家如果想要一支對焦快的定焦鏡,我推薦這支,因為真的很不錯,我覺得物有所值.以前等對好焦時貓咪已經跑到老遠.對於用來影動物跟小朋友是不二之選
