外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
顯示： 1 - 4 (最新發表)
優點:
1. 機身輕巧，放褲袋無難度
2. 24mm廣角方便拍風景，無需再後期拼貼
3. 1080P高清立體聲拍攝
4. 高ISO表現相當優秀，有一定雜訊但沒有色偏
5. AMOLED顯示屏顯示效果出色
2. 24mm廣角方便拍風景，無需再後期拼貼
3. 1080P高清立體聲拍攝
4. 高ISO表現相當優秀，有一定雜訊但沒有色偏
5. AMOLED顯示屏顯示效果出色
缺點:
1. 鏡頭抗耀光能力極差，面對強光時光斑十分明顯而不美觀
2. 錄影時可以光學變焦卻無法自動對焦（部分外國網友說可以，但我不成功）
3. 套用了相片調整（飽和度、銳利度等）就無法使用人臉對焦（難以理解）
4. 轉盤感覺一般
5. 機身較易發熱
2. 錄影時可以光學變焦卻無法自動對焦（部分外國網友說可以，但我不成功）
3. 套用了相片調整（飽和度、銳利度等）就無法使用人臉對焦（難以理解）
4. 轉盤感覺一般
5. 機身較易發熱
評價:
三星應該是有心做相機的，其相機規格較同價位的競爭對手更高，可惜細節方面做得仍不夠好。
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
全高清拍片+Prosumer機。
缺點:
光圈F2.8起及電量不足
評價:
一出就買.原因1920x1080拍片.其它如sony、.Canon到今天也末有全高清.(以Prosumer機計)相片PQ.O.K.啦和其它DC不大分別.但全高清就真是很好.須然電池的時間很短.但已促夠拍足半至一小時的全高清片.(以全滿電池計)當然在攝影方面也有PASM選擇.當然如Canon或Nikon出Prosumer而全高清一定是我的首選。但用了半年直至今天也找不到一部可跟它作比較。S95是我的Dream DC.但要等它出全高清了才換啦。
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
- Packed with features (large aperture lens, selectable focus points, kelvin white balance option, high-definition video, slow-motion video, 10fps continuous shooting, panorama, art filters, RAW capabilities)
- Fantastic AMOLED screen (arguably the best among DCs)
- Slim
- Fantastic AMOLED screen (arguably the best among DCs)
- Slim
缺點:
- Poor implementation
- Extreme distortion at 24mm (in RAW format; JPEG is corrected automatically) - almost fisheye-like
- Weak battery life
- Extreme distortion at 24mm (in RAW format; JPEG is corrected automatically) - almost fisheye-like
- Weak battery life
評價:
The WB2000 is a do-it-all camera that combines the specialties of Casio (fast shooting), Olympus (art filters), Sony (panorama), and Canon (high-def and slow-mo video) into a slim and pocketable body. There is a very good chance that you would find something you want from this camera.
However, many of these features are either falling short of optimal performance or being poorly implemented. The maximum aperture quickly drops to F3.0 at around 28mm. The option to set kelvin white balance is limited by the lowest setting of 3000, which is not enough to correct the warm cast of tungsten light. Adjusting the default setting (which produces pictures that are a bit soft and desaturated) would disable the art filters. The dual-dials on the top of the camera look weird (to some people) and (more importantly) give inaccurate readings. The second control dial (a rarity in DC) does not adjust aperture and/or shutter speed and is not customizable. The size of raw files are inexplicably large (around 24M, the same as those from the 5D Mk II despite offering less than half the resolution).
Because of its poor implementation, the WB2000 would find it hard to satisfy both beginners and advanced users. People looking for a simple point-and-shoot would likely find the pictures taken by the WB2000 too muted to their likings, while would-be buyers looking for a full-featured small camera would likely be frustrated by the camera's awkward control layout.
Regardless of the WB2000's shortcomings, it is refreshing to see a company like Samsung putting a lot of effort in making a great digital product and not holding back its technology. In many ways the WB2000 is an antidote to cameras from Canon, which is never shy of going to distance to cripple its products not for the sake of saving cost but only for the purpose of achieving market segmentation (e.g. no spot metering in 1000D, no AF adjustment in 60D).
However, many of these features are either falling short of optimal performance or being poorly implemented. The maximum aperture quickly drops to F3.0 at around 28mm. The option to set kelvin white balance is limited by the lowest setting of 3000, which is not enough to correct the warm cast of tungsten light. Adjusting the default setting (which produces pictures that are a bit soft and desaturated) would disable the art filters. The dual-dials on the top of the camera look weird (to some people) and (more importantly) give inaccurate readings. The second control dial (a rarity in DC) does not adjust aperture and/or shutter speed and is not customizable. The size of raw files are inexplicably large (around 24M, the same as those from the 5D Mk II despite offering less than half the resolution).
Because of its poor implementation, the WB2000 would find it hard to satisfy both beginners and advanced users. People looking for a simple point-and-shoot would likely find the pictures taken by the WB2000 too muted to their likings, while would-be buyers looking for a full-featured small camera would likely be frustrated by the camera's awkward control layout.
Regardless of the WB2000's shortcomings, it is refreshing to see a company like Samsung putting a lot of effort in making a great digital product and not holding back its technology. In many ways the WB2000 is an antidote to cameras from Canon, which is never shy of going to distance to cripple its products not for the sake of saving cost but only for the purpose of achieving market segmentation (e.g. no spot metering in 1000D, no AF adjustment in 60D).
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
-以1/2.4" CMOS來說, 高ISO表現已算不錯
-可拍1080p/30fps的DC不可多得, 拍片表現很好
-10fps連拍 10mp photo
-f/2.4光圈 - 已算相當大
-24mm wide angle實用
-對焦速度不錯, 比我的Nikon P6000快得多
-可拍1080p/30fps的DC不可多得, 拍片表現很好
-10fps連拍 10mp photo
-f/2.4光圈 - 已算相當大
-24mm wide angle實用
-對焦速度不錯, 比我的Nikon P6000快得多
缺點:
-電量不足, 連影200張也不夠, 用埋閃唔知點算, 去旅行靠佢實唔得 - 致命缺點, 扣分完全因為這點
-控制連拍的轉盤操作不便
-Menu設計仍未夠user friendly
-控制連拍的轉盤操作不便
-Menu設計仍未夠user friendly
評價:
這相機的設計方向比很多大廠行先一步, 相片噪點我覺得可接受, detail尚算清晰
DC小弟一般較想買Canon, 但Canon這公司出產品實在"勒住"得太久, 新feature拖得太久才肯植入產品中, 今時今日, S95做1080p高清拍片有難度嗎? 如果今日S95是1080p拍片, 就算賣貴$500我也一早買S95。 IXUS 1000 HS有1080p HD movie 了吧!? 偏偏widest angle只有36mm焦距, 總要為產品留些缺憾為難一下消費者
無論如何, Samsung出產品積極進取, 值得一贊
不過也有失望, WB2000電力效能實在相當差, 這是specification未有表示過, 實在是可惜。 Casio的DC質素OOKK但仍然抵讚的就是高强的電量, 機無電, 機能幾好都只係一舊無用既膠+玻璃
DC小弟一般較想買Canon, 但Canon這公司出產品實在"勒住"得太久, 新feature拖得太久才肯植入產品中, 今時今日, S95做1080p高清拍片有難度嗎? 如果今日S95是1080p拍片, 就算賣貴$500我也一早買S95。 IXUS 1000 HS有1080p HD movie 了吧!? 偏偏widest angle只有36mm焦距, 總要為產品留些缺憾為難一下消費者
無論如何, Samsung出產品積極進取, 值得一贊
不過也有失望, WB2000電力效能實在相當差, 這是specification未有表示過, 實在是可惜。 Casio的DC質素OOKK但仍然抵讚的就是高强的電量, 機無電, 機能幾好都只係一舊無用既膠+玻璃
1
