1. 成像利
2. 防震效果好，夜景手持成功率相當高
3. 主要功能都設定在機身的按鈕上，都幾方便，唔使成日走入幾層嘅 MENU 度SET
4. 28mm-200mm 焦段好實用
5. 拍片有光學變焦
6. 微距幾得，好玩

1. 對焦不夠快
2. 好多時對唔到焦，部機會自動reset 鏡頭
3. 外型唔夠潮同型 (好幾個女同事都係咁話.....)
4. 趣味性嘅濾鏡不多 (不過我本人係唔用嘅 )

近呢兩年已轉用單反，我上一次買的DC仔已是4年前的事，買時曾考慮這部P7000及C記G12，其實兩部機我覺得大致差不多，除非係"聞相一族"，否則作為一部進階一點的DC仔黎玩，分別不太大。呢部機整體上感覺有入門級單反feel，用開單反好快上手。

雖然話可以支援單反的外閃，但用得呢D機仔，都係想輕便，幹嗎仍要帶支閃出街？

呢D DC仔，老實說，ISO過左800都唔好有太高求，只求作為記錄照算了。另外唔好俾佢個所謂F2.8大光圈呃到，呢D DC仔，係好難做到淺景深效果，愛黎影微距或公仔仲可以做到淺景深效果，影人像就唔好諗咯。

整體上好滿意部機，用 WIDE 黎影景一流，又SHARP又靚。支援手動及光圈等模式，比一般DC仔傻瓜機多好多玩法。

作為單反的後備機，或不想整天帶著好重嘅單反出街時，P7000 係一個不錯的選擇。期待佢會有firmware更新。

good low light shooting

too light

http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967823
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967822
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967826
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967825
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967824
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=967821

easy to use

expensive than Canon G12

bought on 8 Oct.

good photo quality

成像利、色準、功能多、7X zoom、外形pro、重量比G12輕、可以共用SB900閃燈同埋同步線、慳番！電量勁可影四百幾張！行價$3xxx合理，意料之外的驚喜！

未有代電！未有水貨、建議零售價好嚇人！如果再細小小同輕小小就最好，
仲有希望佢其他配件唔好咁貴！
可惜冇咗上代個GPS！

初時拎上手好重好大，再加上對Nikon出嘅DC冇咩信心，雖然自己用緊同廠D90，但係都唔支持佢嘅DC質素！本來想買Canon-G12，因為之前用G7非常滿意；上到某店點知見兩部擺埋一齊比人試，仲有部LX5，試完一輪，發覺G12冇咩特別，保持一向水平，LX5都OK、再試P7000發覺有驚喜，比以往DC影像利好多，放大再比較更勝G12，個心開始豫疑不決！然後再到相熟店一問行機價$37xx雖然咩都唔送，即買！

啱啱買咗一個禮拜要慢慢挖掘。
雖然功能強大不過好容易上手，白痴都變高手.....

如果體積再細D，細多1/4或1/5，像素去到1600W左右，光學變焦24~200MM，F1.8~5.6.....唔知要等幾耐，咁果D專業單反唔使賣喇，相機廠梗唔制.......

除咗唔可以換鏡頭，感覺用緊專業單反.....哈哈！

個monitor好靚, D相片返回電腦mon看, 跟DC mon 差不多一樣, 這個非常重要!!
成像利,色水很好, 自然得來不會太誇張,
ISO 1600 都可以. 足夠!!

行機cost 偏貴
無電量顯示 (要就無電先有提示)
Video.....放棄la ...同D90差不多....ah....
影RAW 時, 儲存緩慢.

我覺得Nikon算用心，做出此各樣規格都平衡的相機, 其實真係沒咩
對焦及相機反應算OK
好揸手, 重量適中
重量ok, 最小太太沒有投訴重量.

very tough hand-on experience.
good range with 28-200 (35mm equivalent), very sharp and vivid color with very accurate and excellent WB with large aperture at F2.8
Dial like pro-DSLR and very useful and save time for setting particularly for snap-shot users.
very low noice at ISO even at 1600

seem a bit larger size but still unacceptable
If it is more wide at 24 or 25mm, it would be much better (not more expensive)

I tried this on Mong Kok Showroom this afternoon, According to staff it should be on shelf by 22-Sep but late. Hope it will be sell from early next week