Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II

實拍照片

外型和操控比G12差，G12握手拎芒手感.好好多，G1x2握手位很少容易跌一定要加手繩，睇相個掣放在上機頂很不就手，背面D掣贴晒邊，反芒看似化學左D，1.5吋感光 lS0 1000已有雜訊……以DC仔吾應該咁重，冇觀景器扣分，G12細細地都有個吾阻位，必要時可用，
機身磨沙感不明顯，g12真係外型半專業過佢，可取是機動性較強比手機質素高D……
G1x mark iii直頭外型改晒變G5X……

機身略重但又不好握手
冇觀景器但又要做高級機
外型和掣位差
質素同其它無反入門比差
靠多功能取勝

多功能老婆機😉

- Excellent Image quality in terms of colour, dynamic range, sharpness and depth of field.
- Versatile Gear that performs well in Street Photography, Portrait, Architectural shots.
- Professional camera that could outperform most prosumer DCs & mid-level mirrorless
- Use as travel camera, streetphotographer camera, or studio camera? It's up to you to decide.

- Heavy, yet manageable.
- Sharpness decreases as aperture widen, keep it small for high sharpness
- A bit disappointed no tele-coverter can be used on it.
- Screw the accessories, they are just not worth the price listed.

No doubt G1x Mk2, is a satisfying successor of G1x.

Compare to G3x, I personally much preferred G1x MK2.
This is not such due to sensor size but also handling and image output.
G1x Mk2 is very easy to carry around too, especially during street shots.

Still, when compare to my 800 HKD GX100 VF Kit..., G1X Mk2 image quality still disappoint me at price performance ratio. Consider G1x only produce image quality only 20% (in studio condition) better than my decade old GX100, but I paid 3.5x price on this.

One might argue this kind of comparision is pointless, as G1x MK2 can excel in many more type of photography than that to GX100. But still, it is interesting to see how two cameras from different era can still fight competitively even in today's standard.

I would recommend prosumer to get G1x Mk2, definitely.

- 24-120mm 實用
- 輕便
- 算扎實, 唯獨個反Mon 支架麻麻
- 大眼仔有氣勢
- 2.0 - 3.9 光圈
- 有反Mon, Wifi, 內閃, 跳閃.....基本常用有晒
- High dynamic range.....接近肉眼
- 色彩唔錯
- Sharp lens
- 對焦OK
- ISO1600 或以下可以用黎聞相, sharpness 下降極輕微, Noise 很少
- ISO5000 或以下堪用, Noise 少不過Sharpness 會下降一截
- 1/4000 快門

- 操控還是有待改善, 例如曝光補償
- 光圈全開不太可用
- 沒有一掃全境
- 電量可接受, 但可以更好, 如果影全日就要兩粒
- 開機再快少少更好
- 解像度OK, 如果1600萬會更好

最impressive 四樣野
1) 好好既Dynamic range, 唔用佢HDR 逆光mode, 普通400% 修正, 個range 已經好好, 和肉眼算接近
2) ISO 可用值很高, 如果要靚相, ISO1600不是問題, 這已經比我之前用Sony A55, NX200等APSC 機還要好少少, 佢ISO value 應該同EOS M or NEX 3 很接近
3) Lens sharp, 2.0 和3.9 皆不可用, 但反複試後, 近攝2.5 OK, 遠攝4.5 OK....所以我當佢f2.5-4.5, 其實拉上補下, 同G7X II 可能平手, 因為ISO 可用值高1 - 1.5級, 但光圈又細返1 - 1.5 級, 應該打和
4) 實用野有齊, 反mon, Wifi, 內閃

一部APSC 機要有支16-80鏡頭光圈值2.5-4.5, 大概似Sony Zeiss 1680 或Sigma 1770 f2.8 - f4......但兩碌野大幾多? 如果係M43 12-60 鏡, 連埋機都仲大過呢部一大截......Canon 出到咁大片幅, 12.5 - 62.5 (24-120mm) 有中光圈, 而又幾compact (等同無反配餅鏡)......其實係好好既平衡~

二手$3000 買入, 物超所值~

大Sensor始終有優點，拍水底片時，沙粒曝光非常適當。

微距始終稍弱

無買錯。

之前各ching大至巳說了,我只補充一點,就是機內軟件勁!

用它真是要上堂

這機用了幾天就要去尖沙嘴展覽廳找人問,結果愉快地離開.
原來這機每一按制,都有好幾種setting,亦各有局限. 給我的結論是,細機扮大機,再加常用軟件後制.例如,相片立体不足,它就可自動拍幾張,用不同的對焦做到好似大光圈大機的感覺.拍夜境仲勁,它會拍幾張來解決,顆粒粗和 反差問題,.....等等. 但要聞相的就可能有點失望,我就用42吋tv,十呎遠望都覺ok. G1XMarkll =數碼相機魔術師

1.5寸感光元件比1寸好
輕
相片有1定質素
可作天岸鏡
日本制造
Touch mon方便偷拍

配件貴
遮光罩和濾鏡轉接器不能同時用
觀景器超貴

初上手覺得相片成不夠sharp,但收細1至2級光圈，相片sharp好多，touch mon反應快，偷拍影小朋友都冇失焦。相片質素拍得住apsc. 但要用時間熟悉操作同調校。曾用過sony rx100.相片質素比rx100好。發色很好，白平衡好。適合隨街拍。放在手袋中適合。聞相都唔差。唔好同FF機比。覺得冇買錯。