1）83倍變焦24—2000mm 仲要有微距。
2）扭 Mon 自拍， 又可高低炒。
3）5 級光學防震。
4）內置 Wi-Fi 及 NFC功能及GPS。
5）1,600 萬像素
6）EN-EL23 專用鋰電池耐用。
7）只有 899 克。
8） wifi過相超快。
9）24mm 有f2.8光圈。
10）行貨三千零蚊超抵玩。
展示第 1 - 9 項，共 9 項
不完美， 但非常好用。
優點:
缺點:
1） 由於Cmos细ISO唔可以高。
2） 追焦速唔夠快。
3） 機頂無閃光燈熱靴。
4） 畫質牽強合格。
5） 冇太陽就可以收機。
2） 追焦速唔夠快。
3） 機頂無閃光燈熱靴。
4） 畫質牽強合格。
5） 冇太陽就可以收機。
評價:
24 mm2000mm夠曬用， 仲要有微距。 要求高嘅冇嘢講，100％不合用，但如 要求流動性、輕便 、例如行山真係一流， 風景、人像、 打雀、微距一機刹曬。（ 打雀要隻雀企定定，十米範圍內效果都唔錯。） 而家基本上出外活動， 我都係只會帶p900， 用作吃喝玩樂遊山玩水。
購入後失去原先所期待
優點:
強大Zoom Range，一機走天涯
握手位設計合理，好掌握
按鍵分配方便使用
握手位設計合理，好掌握
按鍵分配方便使用
缺點:
造工豆腐，單手持機時手握位會明顯格格作响。
機身前近鏡組位置稍用力握持會變形，不夠紮實。
翻轉屏竟然無固定好，我貼完保護貼意外發現顯示屏可以上下推動近1MM
日光機，稍暗就對不到焦，更甚者一片矇矓下竟然顯示中焦。
Zoom到較tele位置時經常對不到焦
不能自行載入Picture Control
機身前近鏡組位置稍用力握持會變形，不夠紮實。
翻轉屏竟然無固定好，我貼完保護貼意外發現顯示屏可以上下推動近1MM
日光機，稍暗就對不到焦，更甚者一片矇矓下竟然顯示中焦。
Zoom到較tele位置時經常對不到焦
不能自行載入Picture Control
評價:
原本買前好期待，因為Zoom得咁遠既機真係得佢可以，但一上手就感覺佢好易散咁，鏡頭組咁重，理應系手握位強化一下，而家一單手持機就感到手柄位頂唔住咁，可能玩開單反，習慣左果種結實感。Zoom比較慢，同埋無得按撥動大小而控制速度，無得玩Picture control比較遺憾，而且比較食電
最後更新：2018-03-11 21:14:54
光度充足的條件下遠攝質素高.
優點:
光度充足類如陽光普照及煙霞少的地方拍照拍攝,zoom盡2000mm(83倍)光學變焦拍出的效果好到令人驚喜.
港幣3字頭抵玩.
港幣3字頭抵玩.
缺點:
缺點不少,各師兄己講!
評價:
便宜及一機走天涯(要求唔太高的話)。
合旅行，行山友！
優點:
有WiFi, NFC,方便過相，
24至2000 mm 好實用，
f/2.8 至 6.5 光圈亦可以接受 ，
相片質素不錯，
手感好好，
已有好多場景原廠設定，
反應，對焦，比預期好。
24至2000 mm 好實用，
f/2.8 至 6.5 光圈亦可以接受 ，
相片質素不錯，
手感好好，
已有好多場景原廠設定，
反應，對焦，比預期好。
缺點:
CMOS 細，
無外置閃燈位，
無B快門，
細CMOS 一般放大相問題(放大比率不可以太大)
外型有點笨重。
無外置閃燈位，
無B快門，
細CMOS 一般放大相問題(放大比率不可以太大)
外型有點笨重。
評價:
滿足本人，一機走天涯 24~2000 mm，
行山，日常生活照，得心應手！
行山，日常生活照，得心應手！
最後更新：2016-07-17 08:05:32
日光下遠攝拍片絶對超班
優點:
1. zoom 得真係好遠.
2. 拍片有防震, 光學變焦 zoom 盡出黎既影像仍很穩定.
2. 拍片有防震, 光學變焦 zoom 盡出黎既影像仍很穩定.
缺點:
1. 機身大同重.
2. 電都幾快用完.
3. 相片質素只能用勉強接受黎形容.
4. 夜攝拍片質素幾差下.
2. 電都幾快用完.
3. 相片質素只能用勉強接受黎形容.
4. 夜攝拍片質素幾差下.
評價:
我本身有 sony dev50 双筒攝錄望遠鏡, 拍埋落呢部 Nikon P900 一比遠攝拍片效果, 結果完全出乎我意料, 在兩部都用光學變焦zoom盡情況下拍片, P900 無論在變焦距離同影像清晰度, 都完勝 sony 呢部賣成過萬既機, 當然 sony dev50 有 3D 攝影功能, 但真係冇幾可會用到. 不過 P900 真係只適合常用遠攝拍嘢同對相片質素要求唔高的人使用 ~
最後更新：2016-06-21 09:07:35
83X.2000mm超遠超正。
優點:
如標題。我一直都吾想買單反，因為單反如果有支2000mm嘅鐿頭，估計我要為鐿頭公司貢獻幾年以上嘅人工（工錢）。追月，好大好清晰。。。就好以天文鏡一樣。連月球表面嘅火山口都清晰可見。。。影遠景，簡直繫無得頂。。。
缺點:
其他師兄講過，我就吾講了。我吾鍾意內罷充電。。。所以買左一個副廠嘅外置充電器。。
評價:
真的好喜歡呢部機。微距到遠景，一機搞掂曬。講CMOS，放大五倍，絕無問題，燥點仍在可接受之內。部機嘅能，可與大部份嘅單反比美。甚至比一部份單反重要好。。。
最後更新：2015-06-23 09:37:28
Mixed Feeling About The P900
優點:
1. Zoom range!!! (the major reason I bought it!)
2. Very good battery life. Shot almost 300 pics and still got 80% power.
3. Very fast and accurate auto focus in bright day light.
4. Tilting screen with varying angle.
5. Fast aperature at the wide end (2.8) and still acceptable aperature (6.5) at the 2000mm end. Not bad!
6. Very good grip design, large and deep.
2. Very good battery life. Shot almost 300 pics and still got 80% power.
3. Very fast and accurate auto focus in bright day light.
4. Tilting screen with varying angle.
5. Fast aperature at the wide end (2.8) and still acceptable aperature (6.5) at the 2000mm end. Not bad!
6. Very good grip design, large and deep.
缺點:
1. Zoom speed can be faster.
2. The zoom back button idea (for checking the target during extreme tele zoom) is great (borrowed from Canon actually) but its speed is a bit slow and therefore not too useful.
3. Obviously lens is much heavier than body so the entire camera is unbalanced.
4. EVF resolution is 920K which is far behind some Panasonic and Olympus EVFs. Usable but not great.
5. The minimum focusing distance is too large and makes it not the ideal camera for flowers, insacts and small objects. The long zoom 2000mm is best for objects very far (like the moon) but if you want to take pictures for objects within several meters and enlarge the magnification using long zoom you will find it not possible to focus due to short distance. To me this is the biggest drawback of this camera because I am not using it for the moon all the time, I took it to the Wetland Park and found it is no better than my EM5 with Panasonic 100-300 combo.
6. Size and weight, more than 800 grams and the only saving on weight is that you don't need other lenses.
7. Poor QC by Nikon, the first P900 I obtained had failure in EVF. The EVF went totally dead and I had to exchange for a new unit. Hope this one goes well.
8. Picture quality is poor. I think my cellphone's PQ is better that the P900. The only problem is without the zoom. To be fair, I think P900 pictures look good if you are viewing them with smartphones but once you view them with large monitor the result is disappointing.
2. The zoom back button idea (for checking the target during extreme tele zoom) is great (borrowed from Canon actually) but its speed is a bit slow and therefore not too useful.
3. Obviously lens is much heavier than body so the entire camera is unbalanced.
4. EVF resolution is 920K which is far behind some Panasonic and Olympus EVFs. Usable but not great.
5. The minimum focusing distance is too large and makes it not the ideal camera for flowers, insacts and small objects. The long zoom 2000mm is best for objects very far (like the moon) but if you want to take pictures for objects within several meters and enlarge the magnification using long zoom you will find it not possible to focus due to short distance. To me this is the biggest drawback of this camera because I am not using it for the moon all the time, I took it to the Wetland Park and found it is no better than my EM5 with Panasonic 100-300 combo.
6. Size and weight, more than 800 grams and the only saving on weight is that you don't need other lenses.
7. Poor QC by Nikon, the first P900 I obtained had failure in EVF. The EVF went totally dead and I had to exchange for a new unit. Hope this one goes well.
8. Picture quality is poor. I think my cellphone's PQ is better that the P900. The only problem is without the zoom. To be fair, I think P900 pictures look good if you are viewing them with smartphones but once you view them with large monitor the result is disappointing.
評價:
I want to get the Panasonic FZ1000 because of its excellent PQ, constant f2.8 aperature throughout the zoom range, excellent EVF and 4K movie capability. However since I already own the M4/3 gears with lens up to 300mm (600mm equilvalent), I think I should skip the FZ1000. So I purchased this 2000mm P900. If given the choice again I would pick up the FZ1000. The responsiveness of the Panasonic is also much faster and therefore happier in use.
The P900 is definitely a pioneer in the super zoom DC category but deal to its weaknesses above it does not gain my recommendation.
Hope this gives help to those who are thinking about either getting the FZ1000 and P900.
The P900 is definitely a pioneer in the super zoom DC category but deal to its weaknesses above it does not gain my recommendation.
Hope this gives help to those who are thinking about either getting the FZ1000 and P900.
最後更新：2015-05-02 10:18:11
平價2000mm
優點:
平 , 2000mm , 有5級防振 ,
雖然有紫邊但不太嚴重 , 4千幾蚊想點
有月亮 及 星軌 Mode
雖然有紫邊但不太嚴重 , 4千幾蚊想點
有月亮 及 星軌 Mode
缺點:
size比想像中大 , 成部單反咁. 鏡頭直徑大.
冇熱靴 , 冇 B Mode
打月一流, 但小心對焦唔夠快去打動態的雀
唔好比廣告騙, digital zoom 好差, 邊有廣告講得咁正
冇熱靴 , 冇 B Mode
打月一流, 但小心對焦唔夠快去打動態的雀
唔好比廣告騙, digital zoom 好差, 邊有廣告講得咁正
評價:
影靜態的東西 , 2000mm 好正(以咁價錢)
長炮中最一般
優點:
日間遠攝勁,
缺點:
重!!!
但到晚上, 影相還可以, 但拍片完全唔同色 (相差太遠)
拍片唔得 (無咩選項), 仲差過C記SX40
低速連拍, Save相唔夠快, 影完要等好耐先完成, 以為hang咗機.
但到晚上, 影相還可以, 但拍片完全唔同色 (相差太遠)
拍片唔得 (無咩選項), 仲差過C記SX40
低速連拍, Save相唔夠快, 影完要等好耐先完成, 以為hang咗機.
評價:
若Ching諗住去打雀及拍片, Ching真係要諗諗.
比我預期差, 惟有等待firmware上改善.
比我預期差, 惟有等待firmware上改善.
1
