- 現價抵玩, 自從有 firmware 2.0後更加超值
- 機身直出jpg發色淡雅自然, 寛容度以M43來講相當好
- 單點對焦快夾準, 無OM的假合焦問題
- firmware 2.0後新增的 Animal Ai有效, 大隻的昆蟲如蜻蜓蝴蝶都認到
- 拍片去到 4K 60 10bit, M43除GH5系列外最強
- 配合自家鏡頭 Dual IS表現極佳, 邊行邊拍片如同加穩定器一樣
- 機身雖大部同重, 實際上手其實好楂過 Em1 II/III, 久持不累
顯示： 1 - 4 (最新發表)
M43中最扺買的全能相機
優點:
缺點:
- DFD追焦唔太可靠, 拍片要就住用或用MF
- 好快無電, 要買多幾舊
- 手持超解(Mode 2)成功率不及EM1 III
- 好快無電, 要買多幾舊
- 手持超解(Mode 2)成功率不及EM1 III
意見:
一向用OM機身但最近開始玩拍片, 咁啱有人放二手就收來玩下,
純影相未必好過EM1 II/III, 但拍片實在相差太遠,
你可以講EM1而家都有4K, 你有幾何會剪4K 60嘅片,
問題係同一format/鏡頭下, Panasonic拍片就係清過OM,
如果拍1080差距更大, 另外如果用緊 G9 firmware 2.0 嘅用家,
建議升埋上2.2, 我發覺夾自家鏡頭, 個Dual IS會再穩定啲,
部機而家現價水貨7K左右, 我認為比EM1 II更抵買,
絧合影相性能相若, 但拍片贏一大截, EM1 III就係另一件事,
星空對焦, 機內ND, 手持超解呢幾樣用得著如獲至寶,
用唔著會覺得佢性價比不高
純影相未必好過EM1 II/III, 但拍片實在相差太遠,
你可以講EM1而家都有4K, 你有幾何會剪4K 60嘅片,
問題係同一format/鏡頭下, Panasonic拍片就係清過OM,
如果拍1080差距更大, 另外如果用緊 G9 firmware 2.0 嘅用家,
建議升埋上2.2, 我發覺夾自家鏡頭, 個Dual IS會再穩定啲,
部機而家現價水貨7K左右, 我認為比EM1 II更抵買,
絧合影相性能相若, 但拍片贏一大截, EM1 III就係另一件事,
星空對焦, 機內ND, 手持超解呢幾樣用得著如獲至寶,
用唔著會覺得佢性價比不高
優點:
對焦快
機身就手
安裝長鏡及大光圈鏡比例及重量平衡
機身就手
安裝長鏡及大光圈鏡比例及重量平衡
缺點:
用電量大，見意加電池手柄
意見:
從gf1至現在G-9已用過多代P記的M43機，一直覺得無論價格，重量，畫質都是本人覺得價性比高，一袋己兩機，12mm至400mm鏡3支14mm，25mm定焦各一支，12mm-60mm鏡及閃燈加腳架世界通山走
最後更新：2019-07-04 12:41:48
優點:
1- Fast AF (see cons).
2- Large and hi res EVF (see cons).
3- Comfortable to hold (for me).
4- Solid.
5- Good control (more or less copycat of hi end Nikon DSLRs).
6- Effectively silent with e shutter.
2- Large and hi res EVF (see cons).
3- Comfortable to hold (for me).
4- Solid.
5- Good control (more or less copycat of hi end Nikon DSLRs).
6- Effectively silent with e shutter.
缺點:
1- AF is fast but it hunts a lot with 200/2.8 with multi-AF points engaged. It has fewer problem with 12-60. In comparison Olympus EM1 mark 2 has much fewer AF hunt with 300/4.
2- Multi-AF points usually pick the nearest subject but its selection is not consistent. Unlike Sony A7 mark 3 or even Olympus EM1 mark 2, I have no idea where G9 will focus on every time I half-press the shutter release. Note that there is very few AF hunt with manually-selected AF point even with 200/2.8.
3- EVF is large and sharp but noticeably distorted at edges.
4- Some may consider it heavy and bulky but it is ok to me.
2- Multi-AF points usually pick the nearest subject but its selection is not consistent. Unlike Sony A7 mark 3 or even Olympus EM1 mark 2, I have no idea where G9 will focus on every time I half-press the shutter release. Note that there is very few AF hunt with manually-selected AF point even with 200/2.8.
3- EVF is large and sharp but noticeably distorted at edges.
4- Some may consider it heavy and bulky but it is ok to me.
意見:
Disclaimer: I do not own any of these cameras or lenses mentioned above. I have been a m4/3 user since the GF1 era, and a 4/3 user since the E1 era.
I played with 6 or 7 G9's in May in various camera stores in Tokyo. All G9's demonstrated identical pros and cons I mentioned above. I spent around 2 hours in total on G9 with various lenses. I did not check the firmware version but I believed it was the original.
I played with 6 or 7 G9's in May in various camera stores in Tokyo. All G9's demonstrated identical pros and cons I mentioned above. I spent around 2 hours in total on G9 with various lenses. I did not check the firmware version but I believed it was the original.
1