產品瀏覽紀錄

Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 35-100mm f/2.0(已停產)

你使用過此產品? 發表用家心得
顯示: 1 - 4 (最新發表)
5
randy7476 (7個心得) 於 2011-04-25 17:35:29
推薦此產品 (使用了 10 個月)
優點:
三個字「快」、「恨」、「準」!
缺點:
都係三個字,「貴」、「重」、「大」!
評價:
太好用了,須然又大又重,影人像超晒班,色彩濃烈,散影好重奶油味,中焦部份利到數毛,壓縮感強烈,逆光控制一流,配合E-5更是超級兵器,用佢會有虛榮感,因為加埋遮光罩支鏡極霸氣,出街影相成街人都望實你,重會問你om咩會有咁大支野出!比d相佢地睇瞪時O咀!小弟應為35-100mm f2.0 贏晒c/n 同級鏡!
5
FrancisFerrari (7個心得) 於 2010-08-15 02:33:16
推薦此產品 (使用了 1 個月)
優點:
超大光圈F/2.0,35-100等同35mm上的70-200mm,
相同焦段全球首創也是只有這一支擁有2.0的大光圈。
曾經獲得The “European Professional Lens 2006-2007” award ,
專業質素得到認同。
造工質感一流,全日本制造。
使用內對焦方法,外型極COOL同高調,型爆。
畫質、解像力都完美無暇。散景極之漂亮迷人。
雖然沒有SWD,但在E-3身上對焦速度乾脆俐落。
1片SUPER ED LEN和4片ED LEN把所有色差、紫邊問題修正完美。
缺點:
重了一點。
沒有SWD。
評價:
這支是OM的魔王鏡,集OLYMPUS的所有光學技術的結晶。
35-100在6支白金圈內裡,本人最喜歡的一支。
最佳光圈值在F2.8-F4,但全開光圈仍然極SHARP。
已經有評測過魔王鏡打敗了C記的小白。
本人自己跟C記和N記的朋友也比併過,
眾朋友都公認此鏡無論是比小黑還是小白更SHARP、畫質更高。
它根本唔只值五星,而是七星。
絕對是所有OLYMPUS用家夢想得到的鏡。
最後更新:2010-08-15 02:35:02
5
pakman225 (1個心得) 於 2009-06-29 19:39:43
推薦此產品 (使用了 2 年)
優點:
1) 手感、手工一流、粗鄺豪邁
2) SHARP
3) 對焦快、静
4) 色彩濃烈
5) 超級人像、SPORT、WEDDING SNAPSHOT鏡
缺點:
重左d、只好加単脚用、
貴、両年前都要$18000
評價:
OM的招牌貨,質素一流。IS在機身上、減少鏡身負担。
小弟常用這鏡配E-3及E-510、range 35-100mm=70-200mm,
影WEDDING SNAP, SPORT-ACTION、
f2.0使shutter range 更寛。
只是重,旅遊時是體力挑戰。始終係好好用之鏡頭。
5
wilfred0083 (13個心得) 於 2008-09-04 01:09:15
推薦此產品 (使用了 4 個月)
優點:
large aperture 2.0 really useable and focus is fast at dim light!
from f4 to f7 can give sharp image from centre to edge
no vignetting at all ranges i.e. 70-200mm ( 35mm equivalent )
bokeh is beautiful
good for portrait
large size can give a professional feel even though my skill is at novice stage
after taking out the lens collar and hold with my hand and switch off i.s. and use single focus point to focus model's eye can give sharp image without blurring
缺點:
1600 g is very heavy, and in most occasions FL50 flash is installed at the body = 2500g
however, this combination can shoot models under strong light background and also at dim conditon.
To hande the system suceesfully,I swim two times a week to improve my physicque so that I can hold this system for a long period of time. Up to now, I can hold the system without a feeling of fatigue.

Price is very expensive but when you shoot photos at dim night without flash, you might find this lens is versatile.
評價:
I have seen some photos and other tests of canon 70-200mm is f2.8, it undoubtedly good for shooting beautiful models but on the other hand , because this lens tends to be designed for softer image, it might not suitable for taking landscape.

In this lens, the sharpness of this lens tends to be in the middle of nikon and canon, might be PS is required for shooting models.

I have no regret of buying this lens and up to now even though you use 70-200mm f2.8 at full-frame body, vignetting problem still an issue and would be the worst at 200mm!! Some jpeg output on DSLR body itself can reduce vignetting, howver, it still cannot totally solve the problem.

Even though the aperture reuced to f4 or even f5.6, vignetting on full-frame DSLR still apparent.

In return when I used f2.0 on E-510 which can give almost vignetting free on images and equivalent to f4 at full-frame. That is the highest aperture useable for DSLR. Therefore, I still strongly agree that my decision to spend so much money on this lens is correct. Of course, a further reduction of $3000 is better for others to consider this lens.

For 4/3 system, people should enjoy 2x for shooting tele but at the same time the depth of field increase a lot. While considering that ccd/cmos reuqires vertical light to enter into it, conventional lens can no longer be used for DSLR, that's why they are selling at lower price and users have to bear the adverse result. The design of this huge lens is to collect more vertical light into the ccd/cmos so as to avoid vignetting.

It was no double a super high grade lens I owned.
最後更新:2008-09-04 01:16:58