- 17-55 用係DX機上，簡直係最常用焦距。
- 買左2年，基本上當kit lens咁用，使用率有90%.
- 夜晚f2.8全開影相依然非常sharp！對焦又快

對女仔黎講有點重，要用一排先適應到個重量。

DX機上黎講，係一支絕對不會買錯，只怕買得太遲的鏡。

人像F2.8常用 好小走焦，收到F4 利害無比，景深非常接近定焦，基本上無咩缺點。DX必上。。。。。唔系騰龍和死馬能夠比得倒噶光學質素。。。

優點蓋過曬缺點啦 對焦環緊左D咯 價錢貴左D咯 值得信賴噶一直鏡王

用左兩年都唔覺得距有咩問題，成像好 比17-35 對焦快準狠，色彩還原真實 3片ED 值得信賴 DX首選。用開龍子噶你千奇米試，試左你就知。

1.符合變焦的黃金比例...3.235倍,質素有保証
2.銳利度頗高(夜晚在街上影model不開閃都能數頭髮)
3.完全可以全開光圈,f4更有驚人表現

1.有點輕身,不够手感
2.變焦環較緊
3.没有VR及納米結晶塗層(有埋就過13,000蚊啦)
4.for DX only
5.不值9880蚊,8000左右就合理些
6.對焦偏慢(同小黑6比,但同級算最快)
7.抗昡光差,100%放大睇相紫邊明顯

雖然只用14日,缺點優點都睇得7788,接近萬元的價格,
還是可以接受的,04年到依家都仲叫好叫座,The king of lens不是浪得虛名!
呢支鏡直頭可以當搵食"架生",買左不會後悔,
賣番出去都不會蝕很多,仲有機會好似小黑5甘停産後,
二手賣出去仲貴過你一手買番黎呢!

- Fast
- Sharp
- Wonderful color
- Professional look

- Big and Heavy

I still remember when I first bought my 18-200vr, I fell in love with it. I thought I don't need any other lens, and I thought I had been taking sharp pictures....... until I got this 17-55mm. Really hard to explain in words. Focus super fast, good in low light (sometimes I still need to use external flash), I wouldn't believe a lens can upgrade a body's PQ by soooo much. I tested it side by side with 18-200 and 35.8, and it provided the best color, picture detail, and sharpness. That's what I had been missing from other lens. Now I can't go back to 18-200, and I have already sold my 35.8 because I know 35.8 won't satisfy me anymore. If you can handle the heavy and/or the price, this is the perfect DX standard zoom lens.

On the side: I thought about switching to Canon when I wanted to upgrade from my first DSLR, but I chose to stay with Nikon because of the 18-200VR (look and performance). Now with this Nikon 17-55, Canon just don't have one to compare it with (in this range). Canon's 17-55 is not a L-lens, and qualify is too far off (although it has IS). Then the L-len is not f/2.8.....

Anyways, Nikon DX fans (proud to be a N-kee person), this is the best you can get!!! Get an used one if you worry that you will upgrade to FF soon. It's like a free rental because you can sell it easily at about the same price.

1.Sharp
2.IF靜且快
3.有手感
4.Made In Japan + 金圏 = 虛榮感

1.重~成800g
2.如用內置閃光燈,有影
3.貴,我覺得值7k

話晒鏡皇,買支二手玩吓,叫做曾經擁有過~
um,結論係...成像無可否認,無敵人像鏡,然則性價比低...成萬銀唔係好值

手感一流
2.8大光圈
對焦快
成像佳

銳利度點都係差少少.....
DX鏡呢講貴左少少

用左3年多時間, 呢支鏡係我最愛用的
但當D3,14-24 & 24-70 2.8 面世, 我便出售17-55,
踏入full frame時代.

如果各位未準備步向FX, 17-55應該係最有保證 (聽聞16-85那支也不錯~)

如果各位覺得DX已經滿足唔到自己, 那24-70 會給你看到更多, 感受更多

好多ching都講左

我最like係金屬鏡身,好有手感!!!

價錢,nikon成鬼日加價!

如果係內變焦就完美啦

買之前都好似好多ching咁上網係咁睇評語,又係咁問fd,
真係睇到好多好多ching話邊支鏡好過佢(e.g 16-85vr),又話c記平咁多仲有埋IS
本身係新手,睇完又睇其實都冇咩分別,最後都係入支2手玩下,因為新鏡又真係幾貴!($9900)
其實最好都係自己試,先知好定唔好,而家n記o係朗豪坊有cs,d鏡任你試,與其日日係咁睇網評同問人,不如親身試下岩唔岩自己先買啦

- 金圈)
- 外形型
- 金屬鏡身手感好
- 一步到位, 唔會再同其它DX STANDARD ZOOM比較
- F2.8 室內快門快好多
- 散景靚
- MADE IN JAPAN

- 始終DX, 會諗係唔係24-70較好(怕上FF)
- 唔夠24-70 2.8 SHARP
- 17X1.5 唔夠24-70 WIDE (個人PREFER STANDARD ZOOM既WIDE 比 TELE重要)
- 無VR
- 枝鏡太舊
- D90 無直倒勁易手震
- D90 無外閃有黑影

有錢上FF既話就買24-70 F2.8 唔好買17-55 F2.8
用過兩枝鏡我覺得24-70 色水 SHARPNESS 都比 17-55 好

對焦快、色準、富立體感

重、重、重!!!

用了2日，本來心大心細買愊廠鏡(平)、但係試完鏡之後放唔倒手！好多人話愊廠鏡同佢差唔多！我可以肯定！分別好大！1.價錢 2.質數(愊廠鏡跟本無得比、質數超班)

金屬物料好正, 個range係最常用, AF 快..(不過70-200mm f/2.8 重快.haha), PQ 向DX 鏡最靚,
f/2.8 眞係好有用..室內同夜景!

冇

之前用16-85mm 其實都好用, 不過用左17-55mm 就......放低唔到!@@''16-85mm 立刻變左支玩具鏡, f/2.8 可以fight低 VR ....如果早d 試過17-55mm 就唔會買16-85mm....各位早買早享受呵~~~~~~~~~