顯示： 37 - 42 (最新發表)
優點:
價錢超平，成像OK（用腳架而言）
缺點:
（唔論價錢）
冇防震，長焦距唔用腳架好難影靚相。
膠mount，配上咁大支鏡，我睇好快KO。
對焦摩打冇力，好慢。
有其他更好選擇。
冇防震，長焦距唔用腳架好難影靚相。
膠mount，配上咁大支鏡，我睇好快KO。
對焦摩打冇力，好慢。
有其他更好選擇。
評價:
千四蚊，好抵玩既長鏡。
對焦慢，好似有D力不從心感覺。
哩支鏡冇防震，手持相機冇腳架都幾難影到靚相（長焦距而言）。
用途唔多，因為我係用Canon機，有支窮人三寶 EF-S55~250mm f/4-5.6 IS，
焦距差唔多，又有IS，出街唔用腳架都得，所以哩支A17已經俾我踢入冷宮。
Sorry，我拎佢出街唔夠十次。
不過專登去影風景，拎腳架既話，都會考慮用佢。
除非有需要，否則唔會輕易拎佢出街。
對焦慢，好似有D力不從心感覺。
哩支鏡冇防震，手持相機冇腳架都幾難影到靚相（長焦距而言）。
用途唔多，因為我係用Canon機，有支窮人三寶 EF-S55~250mm f/4-5.6 IS，
焦距差唔多，又有IS，出街唔用腳架都得，所以哩支A17已經俾我踢入冷宮。
Sorry，我拎佢出街唔夠十次。
不過專登去影風景，拎腳架既話，都會考慮用佢。
除非有需要，否則唔會輕易拎佢出街。
優點:
平係最大因素(一千一百幾)
輕同細~(相對長焦鏡而言)
成像ok(一定好過400D kit 鏡(長短kit set)
有1:2macro
幾型仔
輕同細~(相對長焦鏡而言)
成像ok(一定好過400D kit 鏡(長短kit set)
有1:2macro
幾型仔
缺點:
解像略有不足
無防震(有就唔係這個價錢)
用完macro一定要用MF轉返個對焦環返去
除hood/裝hood時都要轉返MF會好D
聽朋友講AF mode轉hood好易轉壞個對焦環
無防震(有就唔係這個價錢)
用完macro一定要用MF轉返個對焦環返去
除hood/裝hood時都要轉返MF會好D
聽朋友講AF mode轉hood好易轉壞個對焦環
評價:
新手絕對適合
如要求不是太高可考慮
又平、又輕、又細支~
如果係新手我一定推介呢支鏡
1.輕 (新玩唔習慣手持咁重既鏡會好易手震)
2.體積細 (唔洗買大防潮箱同特別相機袋就個size
3.成像唔錯 (絕對好過DC~就算係新手都好易睇出有質素分別)
4.感覺幾型,幾pro (適合一些愛型要pro但又怕麻煩既人)
5.平 (唔想開支咁大又想有少少質素既絕對適合~~起碼唔小心跌爛都唔肉赤)
總括而言如果新手或要求不是好~~高玩到好pro既
依支鏡絕對係不二之選
如要求不是太高可考慮
又平、又輕、又細支~
如果係新手我一定推介呢支鏡
1.輕 (新玩唔習慣手持咁重既鏡會好易手震)
2.體積細 (唔洗買大防潮箱同特別相機袋就個size
3.成像唔錯 (絕對好過DC~就算係新手都好易睇出有質素分別)
4.感覺幾型,幾pro (適合一些愛型要pro但又怕麻煩既人)
5.平 (唔想開支咁大又想有少少質素既絕對適合~~起碼唔小心跌爛都唔肉赤)
總括而言如果新手或要求不是好~~高玩到好pro既
依支鏡絕對係不二之選
優點:
平!!!300mmx0.16到400mm好long,marco,成影好,色好
缺點:
foucs超..........慢!!!!!
2.要170-300先有marco
要推番去170-300先可以轉marco
2.要170-300先有marco
要推番去170-300先可以轉marco
評價:
sp高,好平,二手1000到兩用,新手可以唸下
優點:
- Light
- Good looking than Sigma 70-300mm
- Macro starts from 180mm, better than Sigma lens
- Cheap, only $800 in second hand market
- Good looking than Sigma 70-300mm
- Macro starts from 180mm, better than Sigma lens
- Cheap, only $800 in second hand market
缺點:
- Slow and noisy in focusing
- picture quality worse than Sigma
- picture quality worse than Sigma
評價:
- Not much to complain
- Up to 450mm zoom range for my Sony A100
- Up to 450mm zoom range for my Sony A100
優點:
1. Good Quality for this price ($12xx water goods)
2. Good looking (feel better Sigma 70-300)
3. Light and easy to handle
2. Good looking (feel better Sigma 70-300)
3. Light and easy to handle
缺點:
1. Focus speed very slow (I used Nikon D80 & D200).
2. Macro only at 180-300.
3. Waste time to change Macro=>Normal.
2. Macro only at 180-300.
3. Waste time to change Macro=>Normal.
評價:
1. Cheap lens but with good PQ (only $12xx, so worth it).
2. I used 70-300vr and 70-300ED before. I feel the PQ are in between them. Also the appearance is quite professional.
3. But the speed of focusing is a big problem.
4. Still recommend if shooting object not moving fast and in day time (not good to use in dim situtaion).
2. I used 70-300vr and 70-300ED before. I feel the PQ are in between them. Also the appearance is quite professional.
3. But the speed of focusing is a big problem.
4. Still recommend if shooting object not moving fast and in day time (not good to use in dim situtaion).
