我只用過3個鐘頭
但我覺得光學成像非常不錯
顯示： 1 - 2 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
缺點係重
真係好重,
果個len cap 好貴大個
真係好重,
果個len cap 好貴大個
評價:
第一位user 吾好係到講無用的意見好不好?
24mm 有3.5f TS 係一個好利害的光學設計
點解閣下認為要2.8 ? 2.8鏡片會大塊 甘TS 的運作將會需要更大空間
=支鏡要再大d ,所有沒有2.8的鏡
而且 那是一支消失點修正的鏡頭 用途根本就是用於遠景深的相片，甘大光圈有咩用呢?
我用在FF機上沒有測光的問題。
價錢是跟以往的TS 鏡一樣 ，我看不出貴多少。
24mm 有3.5f TS 係一個好利害的光學設計
點解閣下認為要2.8 ? 2.8鏡片會大塊 甘TS 的運作將會需要更大空間
=支鏡要再大d ,所有沒有2.8的鏡
而且 那是一支消失點修正的鏡頭 用途根本就是用於遠景深的相片，甘大光圈有咩用呢?
我用在FF機上沒有測光的問題。
價錢是跟以往的TS 鏡一樣 ，我看不出貴多少。
優點:
the effect is very funny, go to CS to try urself
缺點:
-u can see the inside part of the lens when u shift it to farest left or right, unacceptable design
-light sensor cannot sense properly after u when u shifting or titling the lens
-should be largest apertune 2.8 as this price
-price very expensive
-light sensor cannot sense properly after u when u shifting or titling the lens
-should be largest apertune 2.8 as this price
-price very expensive
評價:
i think this lens is for patient photographer, not active person.
should be always together with the tripod abt this lens
and this one on 5D is too wide, for 1.6 is much better
45mm that one is better for FF, ex: modeling, landscape ,macro......
nice lens , i give 4 star becoz the price is too high.
should be always together with the tripod abt this lens
and this one on 5D is too wide, for 1.6 is much better
45mm that one is better for FF, ex: modeling, landscape ,macro......
nice lens , i give 4 star becoz the price is too high.
1
