Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm F2.8G IF-ED

評測報告

實拍照片

1.Very Sharp, for small animal & flower!!
2. Very Clear
4. very fast focus
5. Good quality
3. FF lens
4. 映遠嘢都好清
5. easy to 构圖 by using this len!!

Heavy
2K more expensive then Sigma 105 2.8

I use it for half a year bought @ BoARDWAY by $6100

映微距, 一流!!!

但買時一定要認清呢支is for Micro....睇吓你多唔多用到佢嘞^^^
本人就成日用佢嘞!!

I have post some picture in 發表區by using this len..

對焦快,利
散景討好
有VR,金圈,N
有full/0.5-無限遠,好好用

重左少少,粗左少少
貴左少少
其他暫時未發現

買左幾日立刻走左轉鳳園,發現冇買錯鏡,雖然我果支MIC,只要影到靚相我吾介意
有人話佢慢喎,我吾覺,好多野都一下到,當初以60mm及105mm二選一,好彩買左105VR,後悔買得太遲

- VR works in non - macro range very well
- f2.8 good for night portrait
- have all the high end technology: IF, ED , Nano, VR
- 如果比你對到焦, 影花影物真係好正...(但真不易)
- 影大頭相 / 大半身相都好好....
- No distortion at all aperature
- the sharpest 105 lens u can find on earth

- Focus Breathing - the image size changes greatly (breathes) while focusing.
(經常走焦) 是一個很serious 的problem...
- VR does not work in close focus at all !!!!
- expensive lens that does not focus well in macro range...
- Calibrate 枝鏡都冇用
- 當你focus 唔到上面的優點 = garbage!!!!!!!!!

For all-around use as a general-purpose tele, this 105mm is Nikon's best yet.
However, definitely NOT for professional macro shooter ( I am a D700 user)
買來主要影花影butterfly 的, 但好多時在日光的時候, 對焦真係對到想爆粗同火都來...$*@&$
有乜理由一枝$ 6180 macro lens, 比我枝$4000 的 70-300VR 仲難對焦.... d image 變大變小, 真係想唔lun用佢....

我肯定枝枝105vr 都係咁... 因為有reviewer review 過, 我開頭都唔信... 好後知奶野.... @($*@
See extensive review here
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/105vr.htm

我真係好後悔買了這枝105vr...
早知買枝小黑六好過, 一枝=二枝... 又唔洗買70-300vr...

quick response, good AF Accurancy, VR II, fine broken of background, good sharpness , good colour, nano crystal coating,
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan

none up to now.

quick response, good AF Accurancy, VR II, fine broken of background, good sharpness , good colour, nano crystal coating,
good build quality, come with a long hood,made in Japan

結實, well built
對焦快
VR 好有用(execpt micro)
有focus range lock
M/A (micro 有好緊要) focus ring 好順
長度fit 手, focusing ring 剛在指公位
hood 夠深
bokeh 都好creamy

迷焦(in some occation)
紫邊及綠邊出現在DOF外
VR好食電
小小重 on light bodies

有人竟然一味幻想支鏡可比 f/2, f/1.8, f/1.4 鏡影人好, 又希望支鏡唔係105 micro, 而係 60, 200 micro....佢應該係貪平金圈而買....買錯鏡...可惜.

micro 隊到咁上下近支支都sharp, 我唔識比. 無限遠就真係好OK, 2.8 好靚, 唔使收

AF 快, 狠, 準到不得了, 就算影micro都省唔少時間

micro時收到 f/16, 18 都可接受, 再多就唔太好

紫邊及綠邊係最困憂問題, 所以比得4分, 而因為咁, 佢micro比較能安守本分, 做tele 就差少少.

VR比無VR食電一陪, 要帶多舊電

我覺得支鏡冇乜話用途廣唔廣, 105定焦鐘意點用就點用.
反而係支鏡幾肥仔, 非micro不可的話, 比較少帶出去用

1. 多用途, 可影微距及影人, 一魚兩味, 慳返唔少
2. VR2對影人好有幫助
3. 造工非常一流, 手感非常結實
4. 焦距105mm影花影虫一流
5. 一支鏡有齊Nikon所有技術AF-S VR Nano ED IF Micro, 仲送多一環金圈你, 滿足哂虛榮心~
6. 工作距離中規中舉, 比新版0既AF-S 60 micro實用得多
7. 對焦真係好爽快

1. 微距之中唔算sharp, 舊版105仲sharp d, 新果支AF-S 60 micro又係仲sharp d
2. 這是搭單的"影人鏡", 絕對唔算得上是"人像鏡", 同85.4 / 105DC 甚至85.8比影人差太遠了
3. VR2對1:1微距其實係無乜幫助的, 到最後咪又係要推ISO或落腳架
4. 對於105mm焦距的微距鏡黎講, 呢支真係超超重, 仲重過我支70-300VR, 帶出街都好痛苦
5. 鏡身好胖, 外型唔好睇 (不過遮光罩幾好睇)

我俾呢支鏡0既定位係"平均鏡"

平均0既意思即係一支鏡可以幫你達成好多願望! 例如微距, 影人, AF-S, VR, 金圈! 假若你budget有限 / 唔想帶咁多支鏡出街, 一支鏡就可以足以讓你走天涯!

不過, 平均的反面意思是周身刀無張利, 若果你於微距或影人追求更高的話, 就應該入返d專門的. Nikon好似要整到105VR 乜都得咁全能, 但負面的就是令到佢無一方面可以絕對突出

微距方面, 老實講呢支鏡0係微距界之中唔算超sharp, 我覺得呢度有點兒過譽, 支鏡個spec好好但實際上影出黎效果未算很強. 即使個個都俾滿分五星我都要老實地指出呢一點. 若果真的是影微距, 靜態的平的我介紹AF 60 micro(要收到f/5.6以後, 不過靜野收細光圈都無所謂), 靜態的高質素的我介紹AF-S 60 micro, 動態的其實AF 200 micro更好(希望Nikon快d出AF-S 200 micro), 200 micro影蝶一流, 中間的105 micro好像有點高不成低不就

影人方面, 更是絕對唔好同其他人像鏡相提並論, 呢支105 VR只係僅僅合格0者, 影人方面就算是最平價的85.8效果都好好多, 更遑論是85.4 / 105DC / 135DC? 所以絕對唔好妄想呢支可以用黎全職影人像, 佢用黎影人只係搭單而已, 要影人像好0既入返支平平地的85.8仲好

另外, VR只係對影非微距時有幫助, 若果是影微距的話VR2都無乜用的, 呢度又係無乜人提呢一點, 所以我都要老實d咁講

總括黎講, 若果你並非主打微距同人像0既話, 呢一支鏡足以可以讓你守好呢兩個門口
若果你budget有限, 一支鏡已經可以滿足到咁多樣要求, 又真係超底0既, 慳返唔少! 值得推介
不過若果你個別對微距或人像抱有執著0既話, 就應該入返d相應專門些的鏡