24mm
變型比較少
好sharp...同1755差唔多
對焦極快, 好靜

暗角
無hood
價錢

全段都好sharp
比1785進步好多好多
難怪咁多人review同L鏡有得比

優點: 反應快, 色水好sharp, 焦距實用方便.

缺點: 15mm冇黑角, 反而開到24mm到80mm 都有黑角.價錢真係貴左d, 仲要冇hook.

跟7D買的Kit Set.
想左好耐, 比較左好耐, 要17-55 好(有大光圈), 定係要Wide鏡.
結果都係揀左呢支, 因為想影景多d.
好彩都冇揀錯. 呢支鏡反應快 (有USM係唔同D), 焦距方便.
大部分時間帶一支鏡就得.

>> 唯一一支15mm (相對焦距24mm)廣角中段EF-S鏡, 15mm廣角時桶型都屬輕微
>> 採用3片非球面鏡及1片UD超低散鏡片, 解像度及飽和度高, 有力挑戰L鏡
>> 超聲波馬達好靜, 反應快
>> 用72mm濾鏡, 夠大碌, 手感好, 加埋Hood, 真係幾型
>> 4級防震, 影室內更方便
>> 新鏡新技術, 與N記果支16-85mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR(N記係X1.5, 即24-127.5mm)較技之作, 唔會差得去邊
>> 用料好, 手感紮實
>> 除18-200外, 亦可以一鏡可走天涯, 而且肯定比18-200高質

>> MADE IN TAIWAN (心理上問題.....)
>> 平少少更好
>> 冇Hood送 (台灣好似送Hood.....不過唔知係咪"羊毛出在羊身上"??)

EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM同7D Kit set一齊出, 之前做過晒功課, 得出結論此鏡成像銳利, 飽和度高, 而且在解像度測試中, 絕對不下於L鏡!!
個friend之前叫我出齋Body, 再配支18-200 (個friend係50D配18-200), 不過經我考慮過後, 我寧願出呢套Kit set (遲下再加多支SSW IS f/4), 因為貪佢有15-85mm(即24-136mm, 大約有5.7X光學變焦), 質素又高, 雖然7D係我第一部單反, 但之前都長時間佔用個friend部450D, L鏡又唔敢立亂買住, 而且我不嬲都對鏡頭解像度好敏感, 所以就決定出呢套Kit set~~~

用咗差不多一個月, 發現完全對辦, 成像銳利飽和度高, 而且反應快, 同部7D真係絕配, 真係冇乜好彈, 15mm廣角時桶型都屬輕微, 好多師兄話佢冇恆定大光圈, 不過如果好似支EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM咁, 一樣唔係L鏡, 但定價就貴差不多$2,300, 而且肯定冇支15-85咁利, 就算L鏡都冇一支可以响呢個焦段及性價比上完全有壓倒15-85.....
24-70mm f/2.8L USM 定價$11,430 (用於APS-C唔夠wide)
24-105mm f/4L IS USM 定價$8,820 (用於APS-C唔夠wide)
16-35mm f/2.8L II USM 定價$13,110
17-40mm f/4L USM 定價$6,470

感覺呢支鏡係尊做俾APS-C嘅靚鏡, 而且係Canon現今唯一一支俾APS-C機用嘅24mm嘅標準變焦鏡, 係一支完全唔使擔心質素, 而且買咗唔會後悔嘅鏡!!

當然, 如果係MADE IN JAPAN就更加完美啦 !!

個RANGE實用,
造工一流,
IS USM勁有用,
成像,色水也＋分出色,
72MM夠型仔.
一鏡可走天涯.

其實整體＋分出色如定要提出缺点的話....价略貴,有黑角,原hood要比錢買

用了5個多月,個range＋分好用影景夠晒wide,影人又夠sharp,我配7D用感覺都幾正,支LENS本身夠大支....7D三支KIT LENS我個人覺得呢支最匹配.有打算買多支L,但左猜右想都諗唔到喺呢個RANGE以外有邊支能感動我花錢去買(上咗FF同長鏡另計)平常出街又或旅遊真係╴枝搞掂晒!!

焦距超好用!(24-135)
IS防震功效顯著(4級)
USM快而靜
全開光圈已經好SHARP,收埋仲正!
色濃,令我最喜出望外既地方,同L鏡有得比!(用過24-105)
造工明顯比17-55同17-85好,唔易入塵,且型仔
另外購買既HOOD冇以前咁易花!

非恆定光圈
黑角都幾勁,影景一定要收光圈
價錢稍貴

用過24-105,再換17-55,再黎呢支15-85,終於可以安定下來!
24-105焦距唔好用,17-55色淡+設計差....
15-85就真係滿足我幾個要求!
此鏡一定係旅行鏡首選,由WIDE到TELE都夠用!(旅行都好少可用遠距拍攝)

快&準
唔洗等,一下過
做形真的是靚仔一個@.@

暗角位有點差,但可以用相機setting 整整相@@
個價位高~~~是真的
光圈細左D WoW....影個時辛苦D
淺景深,是一個難題

真的是
快&準
我是跟7D kit 有的~~~
IS&USM 合體,十分唔怕失真!
因為金錢問題,選擇左呢支鏡~~~

1.15-85=影景影人一流.
2.IS=可手持拍夜景
3.USM=快+靜.
4.大大舊=很有形

1.光圈較細,不利影散景
2.接近L鏡價錢但沒有hood送.
3.15mm時有變形情況

我之前是用17-40L和A09的.

這支15-85, 去旅行帶一支就得.USM+IS, 手持拍夜景都無問題.以後出街去旅行都唔駛成日換鏡了.
影像色彩還原到高.同之前用17-40L的差不多.
因為不是恆定光圈,所以不可以說是鏡王,但一定是天涯鏡王.我現在14-70L和A09都賣了.但會買支大光圈定焦影散景用.

This lens is really Very Very Very Very Very Sharp!!
Wide enough(24mm equivalent)
Very very very effective IS(I never capture an unsharp picture by it)
Light weight and good balance with 7D
Bokeh not bad

Vignetting with largest aperture if use filter (Vignetting goes away when stop down), I have not try where there are vignetting with no filter attached or use low profile filter.

This lens is much sharper than I expected, the picture capture by it always still looks very sharp on the screen of 7D even you magnify to the maximum
Some members said this lens is not good enough, I wonder there are any sample variation? Or I'm lucky enough to get such an excellent sample.
I also have 24-105L and 24-70L. I can't tell any different among them in term of sharpness(This make me think that whether it is justify to buy such expensive lens)
This lens is sharp at all range. I admit 24-70 f2.8L and 24-105 f4L is obviously better in terms of color rendering and excellent bokeh for 24-70. But as a walk around and a lens for travelling, which light weight is so important, this is a must have lens for Canon crop camera!

1. 焦段十分方便 ;
2. USM 快 ;
3. 有齊4級 IS 及全時手動

1. 無論 WIDE END OR TELE END 均有不平衡o既暗角, 橫度計係右邊嚴重 d ;
(好多攝友連暗角同黑角都未識分 !)
2. 質素唔值 $5500 , 同焦段同光圈下 18-55is 更好 !
3. 無 hood 跟, 要成 $290.-

小弟買左返來, 兩星期已放售, 對呢支鏡真係好失望, loss 幾百元,
整體來說真係唔得 !

跟手入左支 24-105L, 我唔係 L 鏡支持者, 之前用 18-55 IS & 55-250 IS,
真係覺得 24-105L 同 15-85IS 只差二千多元, 絕同值得 !

好sharp,
色彩艷麗,
防震夠強,
對焦快,
鏡身造工好

貴
冇紅圈冇咁虛榮
遮光罩要另買

小妹是用了幾天(當然是用過才上來發表意見),發現果然有傳說中咁好~~我的朋友使用紅圈鏡也覺得這鏡可媲美它們