快&準
唔洗等,一下過
做形真的是靚仔一個@.@
顯示： 25 - 30 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
暗角位有點差,但可以用相機setting 整整相@@
個價位高~~~是真的
光圈細左D WoW....影個時辛苦D
淺景深,是一個難題
個價位高~~~是真的
光圈細左D WoW....影個時辛苦D
淺景深,是一個難題
評價:
真的是
快&準
我是跟7D kit 有的~~~
IS&USM 合體,十分唔怕失真!
因為金錢問題,選擇左呢支鏡~~~
快&準
我是跟7D kit 有的~~~
IS&USM 合體,十分唔怕失真!
因為金錢問題,選擇左呢支鏡~~~
最後更新：2010-03-03 04:01:28
優點:
1.15-85=影景影人一流.
2.IS=可手持拍夜景
3.USM=快+靜.
4.大大舊=很有形
2.IS=可手持拍夜景
3.USM=快+靜.
4.大大舊=很有形
缺點:
1.光圈較細,不利影散景
2.接近L鏡價錢但沒有hood送.
3.15mm時有變形情況
2.接近L鏡價錢但沒有hood送.
3.15mm時有變形情況
評價:
我之前是用17-40L和A09的.
這支15-85, 去旅行帶一支就得.USM+IS, 手持拍夜景都無問題.以後出街去旅行都唔駛成日換鏡了.
影像色彩還原到高.同之前用17-40L的差不多.
因為不是恆定光圈,所以不可以說是鏡王,但一定是天涯鏡王.我現在14-70L和A09都賣了.但會買支大光圈定焦影散景用.
這支15-85, 去旅行帶一支就得.USM+IS, 手持拍夜景都無問題.以後出街去旅行都唔駛成日換鏡了.
影像色彩還原到高.同之前用17-40L的差不多.
因為不是恆定光圈,所以不可以說是鏡王,但一定是天涯鏡王.我現在14-70L和A09都賣了.但會買支大光圈定焦影散景用.
最後更新：2010-01-18 11:19:45
優點:
This lens is really Very Very Very Very Very Sharp!!
Wide enough(24mm equivalent)
Very very very effective IS(I never capture an unsharp picture by it)
Light weight and good balance with 7D
Bokeh not bad
Wide enough(24mm equivalent)
Very very very effective IS(I never capture an unsharp picture by it)
Light weight and good balance with 7D
Bokeh not bad
缺點:
Vignetting with largest aperture if use filter (Vignetting goes away when stop down), I have not try where there are vignetting with no filter attached or use low profile filter.
評價:
This lens is much sharper than I expected, the picture capture by it always still looks very sharp on the screen of 7D even you magnify to the maximum
Some members said this lens is not good enough, I wonder there are any sample variation? Or I'm lucky enough to get such an excellent sample.
I also have 24-105L and 24-70L. I can't tell any different among them in term of sharpness(This make me think that whether it is justify to buy such expensive lens)
This lens is sharp at all range. I admit 24-70 f2.8L and 24-105 f4L is obviously better in terms of color rendering and excellent bokeh for 24-70. But as a walk around and a lens for travelling, which light weight is so important, this is a must have lens for Canon crop camera!
Some members said this lens is not good enough, I wonder there are any sample variation? Or I'm lucky enough to get such an excellent sample.
I also have 24-105L and 24-70L. I can't tell any different among them in term of sharpness(This make me think that whether it is justify to buy such expensive lens)
This lens is sharp at all range. I admit 24-70 f2.8L and 24-105 f4L is obviously better in terms of color rendering and excellent bokeh for 24-70. But as a walk around and a lens for travelling, which light weight is so important, this is a must have lens for Canon crop camera!
優點:
1. 焦段十分方便 ;
2. USM 快 ;
3. 有齊4級 IS 及全時手動
2. USM 快 ;
3. 有齊4級 IS 及全時手動
缺點:
1. 無論 WIDE END OR TELE END 均有不平衡o既暗角, 橫度計係右邊嚴重 d ;
(好多攝友連暗角同黑角都未識分 !)
2. 質素唔值 $5500 , 同焦段同光圈下 18-55is 更好 !
3. 無 hood 跟, 要成 $290.-
(好多攝友連暗角同黑角都未識分 !)
2. 質素唔值 $5500 , 同焦段同光圈下 18-55is 更好 !
3. 無 hood 跟, 要成 $290.-
評價:
小弟買左返來, 兩星期已放售, 對呢支鏡真係好失望, loss 幾百元,
整體來說真係唔得 !
跟手入左支 24-105L, 我唔係 L 鏡支持者, 之前用 18-55 IS & 55-250 IS,
真係覺得 24-105L 同 15-85IS 只差二千多元, 絕同值得 !
整體來說真係唔得 !
跟手入左支 24-105L, 我唔係 L 鏡支持者, 之前用 18-55 IS & 55-250 IS,
真係覺得 24-105L 同 15-85IS 只差二千多元, 絕同值得 !
優點:
好sharp,
色彩艷麗,
防震夠強,
對焦快,
鏡身造工好
色彩艷麗,
防震夠強,
對焦快,
鏡身造工好
缺點:
貴
冇紅圈冇咁虛榮
遮光罩要另買
冇紅圈冇咁虛榮
遮光罩要另買
評價:
小妹是用了幾天(當然是用過才上來發表意見),發現果然有傳說中咁好~~我的朋友使用紅圈鏡也覺得這鏡可媲美它們
優點:
1. 焦段方便
2. usm快
3. 有齊IS / USM / IF / 會時手動
2. usm快
3. 有齊IS / USM / IF / 會時手動
缺點:
1. 光圈真係細左D
2. 貴
3. $6000支鏡都無HOOD跟
4. 雙筒ZOOM鏡, 易入塺
5. 黑角嚴重, 跟本同17-85一樣無改善過.
2. 貴
3. $6000支鏡都無HOOD跟
4. 雙筒ZOOM鏡, 易入塺
5. 黑角嚴重, 跟本同17-85一樣無改善過.
評價:
講真, 呢個價位點解要買佢???
旅行鏡: 唔會方便過18-200 / 18-135
質數 : 唔會好過17-55(只係比多千幾蚊)
小弟沒有買些鏡, 不過用過17-85同用緊17-55.
因為佢同17-85一樣, 推到去50MM已經係f5.6光圈啦!
質數幾好?支鏡有幾快都無用, 因為對應f2.8對焦點已經廢左功,
部相機已經好難對焦, 特別係夜晚, 咁樣支鏡有幾快都無用.
成象我唔知, 因為即使剛買都未必分到佢好唔好.
不過點都唔會追到17-55, 不過價錢就追到貼. 5.6鏡片同2.8鏡片點都無得比.
在觀景窗既明亮度都已經差好遠.
如果支鏡3-4千蚊. 絕對值得用來看門口.
不過要成6千蚊, 聽到都唔會念.
以上只是小弟意見, 如有得罪多多見諒.
旅行鏡: 唔會方便過18-200 / 18-135
質數 : 唔會好過17-55(只係比多千幾蚊)
小弟沒有買些鏡, 不過用過17-85同用緊17-55.
因為佢同17-85一樣, 推到去50MM已經係f5.6光圈啦!
質數幾好?支鏡有幾快都無用, 因為對應f2.8對焦點已經廢左功,
部相機已經好難對焦, 特別係夜晚, 咁樣支鏡有幾快都無用.
成象我唔知, 因為即使剛買都未必分到佢好唔好.
不過點都唔會追到17-55, 不過價錢就追到貼. 5.6鏡片同2.8鏡片點都無得比.
在觀景窗既明亮度都已經差好遠.
如果支鏡3-4千蚊. 絕對值得用來看門口.
不過要成6千蚊, 聽到都唔會念.
以上只是小弟意見, 如有得罪多多見諒.
