以非 L鏡既價錢
1. 當非安全快門速度既時候 IS 真係好好
2. 對焦都靜
3. 成像表現比美L鏡, 好SHARP (可能我要求唔高)
4. 相比 SSWis / SWis 輕便好多
5. FF 鏡, 上FF都可以用返
6. USM 寧靜
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
1. 伸縮鏡,易入塵
2. 另買HOOD要多$300幾 (CANON 老問題)
3. 光圈比較小
4. 唔係內對焦, 前面對焦環會轉
2. 另買HOOD要多$300幾 (CANON 老問題)
3. 光圈比較小
4. 唔係內對焦, 前面對焦環會轉
評價:
之前用55-250 IS 都唔錯, 但呢支有USM於室內影終於聽唔到電鑽聲!! 電鑽聲會令人好煩!!
係死光 $4450 入手, 試鏡時ZOOM 到200mm 一張關IS, 一張開IS, 分別好,完全感覺到三級 IS既威力! 散景都唔錯!! 可能加多大約1k, 就可以買 70-200 4L, 但長焦IS係絕對好重要, 所以考慮此鏡!! 其他都寫曬係上面!!
係死光 $4450 入手, 試鏡時ZOOM 到200mm 一張關IS, 一張開IS, 分別好,完全感覺到三級 IS既威力! 散景都唔錯!! 可能加多大約1k, 就可以買 70-200 4L, 但長焦IS係絕對好重要, 所以考慮此鏡!! 其他都寫曬係上面!!
優點:
Light and Small (relatively)
Good Picture Quality (very close to 24-105L)
Range is good (upto 300) which SSW cannot reach
Very good in outdoor, daylight condition
Good Picture Quality (very close to 24-105L)
Range is good (upto 300) which SSW cannot reach
Very good in outdoor, daylight condition
缺點:
Small Aperature, thus weaker in indoor, dim condition
Appearance not \"cool\" enough, but with hood will improve the outlook
Appearance not \"cool\" enough, but with hood will improve the outlook
評價:
As I am not a frequent user for tele-zoom lens and this one is very good backup lens for me. SSWIS of course is great but is too expensive for me as a non-frequent user. Picture quality is of no doubt. Totally agreed Photozone mentioning it is a \"hidden L lens\".
優點:
(1) 影像、色水、色彩還原度、立體曾次等，都起正 (以non L 鏡嚟講)！
(2) 有名貴UD鏡片一塊！
(3) 去到300mm，超超超超超超實用
(4) 有三級IS。
(4) 輕
(5) 鏡身實淨。
(6) 垂下時不會像Canon 18-200 IS 會自動變焦
(7) 便宜，四千左右
(8) 外型算靚
(9) 300mm 影人都算利，即70至300mm全焦段可園
(2) 有名貴UD鏡片一塊！
(3) 去到300mm，超超超超超超實用
(4) 有三級IS。
(4) 輕
(5) 鏡身實淨。
(6) 垂下時不會像Canon 18-200 IS 會自動變焦
(7) 便宜，四千左右
(8) 外型算靚
(9) 300mm 影人都算利，即70至300mm全焦段可園
缺點:
(1) 光圈稍細，環境暗要推高ISO，所以body最好係50D以上等級，因入門級body noise控制可能無咁強。
評價:
我徙40D年代至現在7D都用他，我曾同時擁有小白IS，雖小白IS明顯影人靚啲，但太重太重，令你好快累，兼少了200至300mm焦段，實用性不及此70-300IS，所以我放了小白IS。在光線充足時，此70-300IS有小白IS 95%功力，環境稍暗都有85%功力，所以絕對適合長keep長用。外國網站photozone形容此鏡為""a hidden Canon L lens""，可見其實力幾強，請參閱http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/200-canon-ef-70-300mm-f4-56-usm-is-test-report--review?start=2
優點:
300mm 有 IS & USM , 平輕正(光學質素同24~105 一樣得3粒半星photozone網). 方便攜帶.
缺點:
外形唔靚, 無自豪感.
評價:
使用這款鏡已經有一年時間,主要用來拍攝孩子足球比賽, 當90分鐘拿住1.2kg 來部捉比賽過程,已經很累. 450 之追蹤對焦非常準確, 可以拍攝(交波,傳球,射門)連眼看不到一殺那情景. 若200mm 以上沒有使用IS , 在天陰時候,很難拍得清楚. 這款鏡IS非常有效, 300mm手持拍攝,15分1秒亦ok.
以業餘拍友來講,拍攝運動場合, EF70 ~ 300 IS USM 值得推薦.
以業餘拍友來講,拍攝運動場合, EF70 ~ 300 IS USM 值得推薦.
優點:
有雙重防抖...
便攜!!!
便攜!!!
缺點:
在最遠端光圈太細...在暗少少的環境下
即使有防抖...也很痛苦
價格相若下...寧願選擇 Canon EF 70-200mm f4.0L USM
好後悔
即使有防抖...也很痛苦
價格相若下...寧願選擇 Canon EF 70-200mm f4.0L USM
好後悔
評價:
如果係作為旅遊用還可以過得去...畢竟不是很大支
優點:
(1) light weight, lighter than Canon DO lens (same range)
(2) very cheap price.
(3) Very Useful IS, I try to turn off it's IS to take a photos, then I turn on the IS to take a same view photos. The two image is completely different. It can reveal the IS is 100% useful & workable.
(4) Long range, I understand Canon 70-200 f/4 IS quality is better, but when you need the range 200mm to 300mm, then you need to run. Therefore, the range 200mm to 300mm is definitely useful, specially in some shap shot and urgent situation.
(5) The picture quality is excellent with UD element. I have Canon 24-105mm L lens. I compared it with Canon 70-300mm. I found the 70-300 lens have about 90% quality of L lens, but the price is only half. It is a real bargain.
(6) low profile, when you are at the beach or street to take photos from stranger who will not easily discover due to the lens appearance is very low profile.
(7) solid built. I found the quality of this lens built have no obvious different with 24-105mm
(8) too much 優點 which you need to find out.
(2) very cheap price.
(3) Very Useful IS, I try to turn off it's IS to take a photos, then I turn on the IS to take a same view photos. The two image is completely different. It can reveal the IS is 100% useful & workable.
(4) Long range, I understand Canon 70-200 f/4 IS quality is better, but when you need the range 200mm to 300mm, then you need to run. Therefore, the range 200mm to 300mm is definitely useful, specially in some shap shot and urgent situation.
(5) The picture quality is excellent with UD element. I have Canon 24-105mm L lens. I compared it with Canon 70-300mm. I found the 70-300 lens have about 90% quality of L lens, but the price is only half. It is a real bargain.
(6) low profile, when you are at the beach or street to take photos from stranger who will not easily discover due to the lens appearance is very low profile.
(7) solid built. I found the quality of this lens built have no obvious different with 24-105mm
(8) too much 優點 which you need to find out.
缺點:
$4150 HKD, no缺點, I bought it at Telford Plaza Pak Lo Wui today.
評價:
The lens you should try. I personally consider it as the most excellent lens among the lens in price of about $4000 HKD.
