(1) powerful IS
(2) balancing weight with DSLR body
(3) build quality is ok
(4) reasonable price
(5) one UD element is included
(6) made in Japan
(7)6 bladed (circle type) for better (soft) background / smooth broken
顯示： 19 - 24 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
(1)micro USM only
(2)non L class
(3)hood is sold seperately
(4)max f4-f5.6
(2)non L class
(3)hood is sold seperately
(4)max f4-f5.6
評價:
it is a good walking around (snapshots) lens of consumer grade with affordable price .
優點:
好sharp,有IS同USM, 配40D後開儘光圈成像都不差
缺點:
伸縮設計不好, 可能易入塵(但我玩左半年無入塵)
評價:
用40D都OK . 夠一般用,人景都ok
就算用canon 無L ,各方面都OK,買L 定非 L 好呢? 自已想下...
300mm 正正正........
就算用canon 無L ,各方面都OK,買L 定非 L 好呢? 自已想下...
300mm 正正正........
最後更新：2008-08-22 22:59:23
優點:
防手震三級相當理想。暗光中打高ISO到1600，效果理想。70mm時成像無誤差。重量舒適。做旅行鏡十分適合。
缺點:
300mm時如果用點對焦，對焦會前後搜尋。改用九點全面對焦則無這個問題，而且對焦準確快速。
評價:
我使用Canon 400D。裝上此鏡相當便利：因為是黑色，所以抓拍時並不容易引起衝突。其他師兄講既優缺點都正確。對我來說：好用、舒適。
最後更新：2008-08-04 17:29:58
優點:
IS----very useful in this range
Solid built---that's why it lined up to over 4000HKD
Excellent for snap shot
Solid built---that's why it lined up to over 4000HKD
Excellent for snap shot
缺點:
Focusing speed----so far so good, but if you go for sport with it, pls forget it~~
Colour saturation---not my concern in digital world.
Somone say that it's not dust/water-proof---I am not doing a surgery with it, I take photos only.
Colour saturation---not my concern in digital world.
Somone say that it's not dust/water-proof---I am not doing a surgery with it, I take photos only.
評價:
Much better than what i predict
I use 70-200mm range only becoz after 200mm the quality becomes unacceptable. But between 70-200mm, it really give me surprise.
Try to take a look of the MTF chart before going forward.
Or you can buy 70-200mm f/4 L but no IS if you want a better image quality. It's just a few hundreds difference only.
I use 70-200mm range only becoz after 200mm the quality becomes unacceptable. But between 70-200mm, it really give me surprise.
Try to take a look of the MTF chart before going forward.
Or you can buy 70-200mm f/4 L but no IS if you want a better image quality. It's just a few hundreds difference only.
優點:
色水一般，ＩＳ夠定，鏡身輕
缺點:
ＦＩＬＴＥＲ位在對焦時好似會轉，不連ＨＯＯＤ，邊緣成像普遍不夠ＳＨＡＲＰ。
評價:
相比用慣之Ｌ鏡，此鏡色水偏淡，光圈有時要收少一兩級，銳利度才算可用。此鏡在５５－２５０ＩＳ出後常拿出來比較。如果只論成像及色水，５５－２５０ＩＳ比此鏡還要青出於藍。但是５５－２５０是無ＩＳ及不可上ＦＦ的，如果要堅持ＵＳＭ及保持上ＦＦ的潛力，那麼便唯有要這支四千多圓的鏡頭了。但如果平時只是影風景及長用ＡＰＳＣ，不如ＫＥＥＰ用５５－２５０。
另外重有一支７０－３００ＤＯ，不過個支重測光色水唔係好穩定，所以絕不推介。
另外重有一支７０－３００ＤＯ，不過個支重測光色水唔係好穩定，所以絕不推介。
優點:
300mm 加 IS 功能,用過後就知其強勁,成像銳利,對焦準確,就算拍人像,影深都很好,比L鏡平一大截。
缺點:
沒防水滴及防塵
評價:
用了太約一年,算是可客觀寫一寫評論,大眾所寫的優點缺點一定存在,如集所有鏡頭好處於一身,一定是天價或軍用。這鏡我配400D入門機,出來效果,和40/30D沒分別,玩機其實是玩鏡,此鏡以這個定價,算是超值,錢有鬆動當然L鏡會更好,但定價多一倍有多。但質素不會多一倍,虛榮心就會。追求終質素,和價錢預算,每人也不同。
Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM $17000
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM $9500
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM $34,800
所有300mm對焦定焦有IS冇IS大光圈細光圈,每上一小級,定價一大級,不是說不好,這只及映出↓
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM $4,200
有多價廉物美
Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM $17000
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM $9500
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM $34,800
所有300mm對焦定焦有IS冇IS大光圈細光圈,每上一小級,定價一大級,不是說不好,這只及映出↓
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM $4,200
有多價廉物美
