1.色水靚
2.重量適中
3.好手感
4.內變焦
5.USM,L鏡
6.17mm wide
7.防塵防滴鏡身
8.對焦又快又靜
9.28mm , 17mm實用
10.hood靚仔
顯示： 31 - 36 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
光圈得F4比較細
係較暗嘅地方要推高ISO
原配遮光罩美觀多過實用
係較暗嘅地方要推高ISO
原配遮光罩美觀多過實用
評價:
小弟用二手的$3500
岩岩買黎冇耐~
一用上手已經覺得好正!!
真係搵唔到咩缺點~
小弟用7D，感覺其畫質在各方面都比17-55好。如色濃啲、立體曾次強啲、利啲、飽和度高啲。其相機先進準光系统更佩合此鏡。此鏡是我唯一一定唔會放的鏡。
岩岩買黎冇耐~
一用上手已經覺得好正!!
真係搵唔到咩缺點~
小弟用7D，感覺其畫質在各方面都比17-55好。如色濃啲、立體曾次強啲、利啲、飽和度高啲。其相機先進準光系统更佩合此鏡。此鏡是我唯一一定唔會放的鏡。
優點:
1. 成像正我認為係大小三元中係最大光圈最正的一支
2. Zoom 唔會申出申入, 加filter 後好安心
3. 變形控制好好
4. 平 5k 有交易
5. 防水防塵
6.FF 同 non-FF 焦段都o甘正
7. 恆定光圈
2. Zoom 唔會申出申入, 加filter 後好安心
3. 變形控制好好
4. 平 5k 有交易
5. 防水防塵
6.FF 同 non-FF 焦段都o甘正
7. 恆定光圈
缺點:
無, 但好唔公平o甘講(有d玩野):
1. 光圈唔夠細 (光圈越大越好但格錢不變)
2. 無IS (雖然作用不大)
1. 光圈唔夠細 (光圈越大越好但格錢不變)
2. 無IS (雖然作用不大)
評價:
愛影wide 和 FF機必買一支鏡.
優點:
1. 價錢不貴
2. Canon紅圈鏡，質素差極都有限
3. 好輕身，同機身平衡好好
4. 焦距用落FF好用~
5. 防塵防水滴
2. Canon紅圈鏡，質素差極都有限
3. 好輕身，同機身平衡好好
4. 焦距用落FF好用~
5. 防塵防水滴
缺點:
1. 光圈有時真係想大d
評價:
本人係用5D2機身，因為識人買呢支鏡，所以$51XX我覺得係超抵買!!! (街買就真係貴d...)
買呢支鏡之前都用緊35L、135L，都叫做睇慣左靚野，初初未買果陣，成日質疑支鏡咁既價錢仲要係zoom lens，質素會唔會達唔到我預期效果~買左返來試過之後，覺得canon做呢支鏡真係賣大包~呢支鏡只係我支35L一半既價錢，光圈只要收到5.6，銳利度已經同我支35L差唔多平起平坐~真係唔敢相信咁既價錢而且又係zoom都會有咁好既質素~真係值得一讚!!!另外，鏡身重量幾輕巧，用落部機(淨機冇加直度)好好平衡~之前見d人成日話呢支鏡用落FF變形控制好差，我又唔覺bo，係就係有少少，但係呢個價錢真係完全接受到有餘囉~光圈雖然係細左少少，但係都係果句，咁既價錢仲想點???
如果各位係用apsc的話，我覺得應該選擇其他鏡例如，A16, S18-50, C17-55.....因為光圈實在係唔夠大，用落FF都話推高少少ISO都冇所謂，但係apsc推高少少noise就好多，而且40mm作為apsc既標準鏡都唔夠tele啦，所以我勸各位apsc用家如果考慮買呢支作為standard zoom，都係考慮清楚好d~
如果係FF用戶，又想買wide鏡，呢支真係可以諗下~
因為我之前都冇諗過買呢支既，本身諗住儲錢買14LII，之後睇到人地review，人地nikon支14-24同canon支14LII比試，有睇過既朋友都知道吧，canon定焦wide鏡都輸比人地zoom鏡~
所以諗深一層，Canon做wide鏡技術似乎都係未夠，仲要賣到$15XXX，16-35II我又覺得只係光圈分別，冇價值~諗諗下真係平平地買支17-40好過~另外Sigma 12-24都同呢支差唔多價錢，但係我試過朋友果支，真係對佢有d失望~
12mm@FF係就係超級wide，但係wide還wide，即使光圈收到11，中心位都只係一般，邊位就更加，邊位俾到我感覺係免強為左wide而wide，完全都睇唔到野.....
希望我個心得可以幫到咁多位選擇啦/\/\!!!
買呢支鏡之前都用緊35L、135L，都叫做睇慣左靚野，初初未買果陣，成日質疑支鏡咁既價錢仲要係zoom lens，質素會唔會達唔到我預期效果~買左返來試過之後，覺得canon做呢支鏡真係賣大包~呢支鏡只係我支35L一半既價錢，光圈只要收到5.6，銳利度已經同我支35L差唔多平起平坐~真係唔敢相信咁既價錢而且又係zoom都會有咁好既質素~真係值得一讚!!!另外，鏡身重量幾輕巧，用落部機(淨機冇加直度)好好平衡~之前見d人成日話呢支鏡用落FF變形控制好差，我又唔覺bo，係就係有少少，但係呢個價錢真係完全接受到有餘囉~光圈雖然係細左少少，但係都係果句，咁既價錢仲想點???
如果各位係用apsc的話，我覺得應該選擇其他鏡例如，A16, S18-50, C17-55.....因為光圈實在係唔夠大，用落FF都話推高少少ISO都冇所謂，但係apsc推高少少noise就好多，而且40mm作為apsc既標準鏡都唔夠tele啦，所以我勸各位apsc用家如果考慮買呢支作為standard zoom，都係考慮清楚好d~
如果係FF用戶，又想買wide鏡，呢支真係可以諗下~
因為我之前都冇諗過買呢支既，本身諗住儲錢買14LII，之後睇到人地review，人地nikon支14-24同canon支14LII比試，有睇過既朋友都知道吧，canon定焦wide鏡都輸比人地zoom鏡~
所以諗深一層，Canon做wide鏡技術似乎都係未夠，仲要賣到$15XXX，16-35II我又覺得只係光圈分別，冇價值~諗諗下真係平平地買支17-40好過~另外Sigma 12-24都同呢支差唔多價錢，但係我試過朋友果支，真係對佢有d失望~
12mm@FF係就係超級wide，但係wide還wide，即使光圈收到11，中心位都只係一般，邊位就更加，邊位俾到我感覺係免強為左wide而wide，完全都睇唔到野.....
希望我個心得可以幫到咁多位選擇啦/\/\!!!
優點:
1）價錢合理
2）77mm 鏡身，外形夠Pro
3）輕便，手感一流
4）USM 對焦速度快
5）APS-C and FF 兩用
6）內對焦，不用伸出伸入，防塵防水
7）有恆定f/4光圈可用
8）畫質質素高
2）77mm 鏡身，外形夠Pro
3）輕便，手感一流
4）USM 對焦速度快
5）APS-C and FF 兩用
6）內對焦，不用伸出伸入，防塵防水
7）有恆定f/4光圈可用
8）畫質質素高
缺點:
1）比EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM 差[ 價錢一大截 ]
2）用Hood 唔方便
3）Range短，遠攝不足[ 但比16-35mm L已經好好 ]
2）用Hood 唔方便
3）Range短，遠攝不足[ 但比16-35mm L已經好好 ]
評價:
兩用鏡.........上FF仍然用得番，值得擁有的一支紅圈L鏡
優點:
L Lens quality,
Sharp at f4,
light,
fast USM,
value for money!
the zoom range is good for APS-C and even better on FF!
Sharp at f4,
light,
fast USM,
value for money!
the zoom range is good for APS-C and even better on FF!
缺點:
just one thing....f4 (however f2.8 will be another price range=P)
評價:
I actually tried, three lens before I buy it, this one, 24-70L and 16-35L
The 24-70L is soft at 2.8...which mean if you need sharp photos, still have to use at least f3.5, and I have a 550D, when using it on my camera, you can fill it is not a matching lens for this body, the zoom range is something in the middle, I have 70-200 f4 IS, it's suit well, you wont feel the lens is heavy and the body too light, but 24-70 just too heavy for my camera, and soft at f2.8
16-35L is good but money wise, I am not prepare to go for f2.8 with 1 more mm wider for another $5xxx, I can get the 35 f2 and 24 f2.8 for the money I saved for better picture quality!
So I decided to go for 17-40L and 24-70L can be consider again when I go FF later=)
The 24-70L is soft at 2.8...which mean if you need sharp photos, still have to use at least f3.5, and I have a 550D, when using it on my camera, you can fill it is not a matching lens for this body, the zoom range is something in the middle, I have 70-200 f4 IS, it's suit well, you wont feel the lens is heavy and the body too light, but 24-70 just too heavy for my camera, and soft at f2.8
16-35L is good but money wise, I am not prepare to go for f2.8 with 1 more mm wider for another $5xxx, I can get the 35 f2 and 24 f2.8 for the money I saved for better picture quality!
So I decided to go for 17-40L and 24-70L can be consider again when I go FF later=)
