-Feels very light. Only 20g lighter than my 50/1.4 in spec but feel much lighter than that.
-Resolution wise is okay at center. Seems to be similar to my Tamron 28-75 in the center but better in the cornor. Resolution chart results from the-digital-picture.com seem to also indicate that this lens has better corner performance than Canon 17-40, 24-70 or 24-105.
-Slight CA when wide open.
-Distortion is quite good IMO. Much better than Tamron 28-75 @ 28mm, which lens should already be performing fairly good in this area.
-Vignetting is on par with my Tamron at 28mm.
-You are probably not buying this lens for bokeh but if it matters bokeh seems to be good.
-Contrast is fair.
-I have not noticed flare problem.
-Focuses fairly quick and accurately. I think close to 50/1.4.
-Minimum focusing distance is short @ 25 cm.
-Filter thread is 58 mm so filters would not be very expensive.
顯示： 1 - 5 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
-Build quality is only fair. Slightly less than 50/1.4.
-Hood can be expensive and not easy to find. Even non-original ones are kind of expensive compared to more common lens hoods.
-I expect resolution to be a bit better in the center.
-Vignetting should be controlled better. There is currently no Canon lens profile for this lens on DPP so need to do the correction manually.
-I also expect better contrast on this lens.
-From what I have searched online, flare control isn't very good so it is better to have the hood on all the time for this lens.
-AF is not silent. Not really a major problem for me though.
-Hood can be expensive and not easy to find. Even non-original ones are kind of expensive compared to more common lens hoods.
-I expect resolution to be a bit better in the center.
-Vignetting should be controlled better. There is currently no Canon lens profile for this lens on DPP so need to do the correction manually.
-I also expect better contrast on this lens.
-From what I have searched online, flare control isn't very good so it is better to have the hood on all the time for this lens.
-AF is not silent. Not really a major problem for me though.
評價:
I still use my old camera Canon 5D. Lens itself not very easy to find second hand. If there is one on sale, it will probably be around $2,000 or less. For a lens this age (20+ years), I have really not too many complaints about it. The cons mentioned are only very slight in my opinion. I enjoyed the lightness of this lens. I would hope for better resolution in the center and an USM motor if possible.
優點:
小巧易携,旅行時比想像中好用,在APSC机上約為38mm,影一般半身人像及風景都幾好用
缺點:
2.8時不銳利,要收到4才sharp.
評價:
又平又輕又細,好易携帶但成像一般,佩在APSC机身不夠APSC專用鏡好,有点後悔,早知買50mm1.8或sigma的30mm
優點:
* 小巧 , 方便隨身攜帶
* 價錢平 , 新的 $2800 左右有交易 (以超廣角定焦鏡來說是價廉物美)
* 質料 OK ~ 有金屬接口~鏡身實淨
* 畫質比每一支 L Zoom 鏡都靚. (始終是 定焦麻)
* 58mm 濾鏡口 , 極大眾化
* 是全幅鏡 , 日後必定有用
* 價錢平 , 新的 $2800 左右有交易 (以超廣角定焦鏡來說是價廉物美)
* 質料 OK ~ 有金屬接口~鏡身實淨
* 畫質比每一支 L Zoom 鏡都靚. (始終是 定焦麻)
* 58mm 濾鏡口 , 極大眾化
* 是全幅鏡 , 日後必定有用
缺點:
* 冇 USM , 對焦有 d 嘈.
* 光圈得 2.8 唔夠大.
* 雖然影像細利 , 但總有一點奶油般的感覺
* 24mm 廣角變形依然存在 , 即使是使用 APS-C 的機也察覺得到
* 有紫邊問題. 邊緣成像不夠銳利,
* 以同級 28mm F2.8 來比 , 鏡片多 , 成像也因此下降 .
* 沒有加入非球面鏡 .
* 鏡身密閉做得唔好 , 極容易入塵 ( 完美主意者三思 )
* 光圈得 2.8 唔夠大.
* 雖然影像細利 , 但總有一點奶油般的感覺
* 24mm 廣角變形依然存在 , 即使是使用 APS-C 的機也察覺得到
* 有紫邊問題. 邊緣成像不夠銳利,
* 以同級 28mm F2.8 來比 , 鏡片多 , 成像也因此下降 .
* 沒有加入非球面鏡 .
* 鏡身密閉做得唔好 , 極容易入塵 ( 完美主意者三思 )
評價:
這是我入手的第二支定焦鏡, 畫質尚可接受 ,
但各位想入手的師兄不要期望它的畫質可以超越 50mm F1.8 ,
總括來說 , 他是最平宜的超廣角高畫質的定焦方案
(本人只是想將內心的使用感受說出 , 希望我的評價能幫到大家, 謝謝)
但各位想入手的師兄不要期望它的畫質可以超越 50mm F1.8 ,
總括來說 , 他是最平宜的超廣角高畫質的定焦方案
(本人只是想將內心的使用感受說出 , 希望我的評價能幫到大家, 謝謝)
優點:
價錢好平 二手都係$2000或以下就有交易
好輕, 好細支, 好短 有古舊FEEL
好滿意這支質素 同L ZOOM鏡差唔多
最佳光圈值 f/8左右 好sharp
唔會伸出伸入
對焦都好快
好輕, 好細支, 好短 有古舊FEEL
好滿意這支質素 同L ZOOM鏡差唔多
最佳光圈值 f/8左右 好sharp
唔會伸出伸入
對焦都好快
缺點:
外表唔夠殺
AFD對焦 會嘈 冇全時對焦
1988年出產 好耐
市面好難搵 二手都係好難搵 好高興我會買到XD
AFD對焦 會嘈 冇全時對焦
1988年出產 好耐
市面好難搵 二手都係好難搵 好高興我會買到XD
評價:
唔知點解 好意黎支
會KEEP住用
會KEEP住用
1
