Sony A99

評測報告

實拍照片

not good

not worth

No internal flash

支鏡較重連A99機身不錯手感，平衡比A900好好多。

希望有OVF & EVF，A99連Zeiss24-70/一D都唔sharp，感覺APSC質數，好失望！放棄！

上Sony shop 試機配Zeiss 24-70/2.8，店內試啪幾遠近距離，一張2.8一張8光圈。
回家一比一放大一D都唔sharp。本想入手sony好耐，FF一直失望！
同RX1-R畫質比輸一條街有多。

- Light weight for a flag ship model because of no pentaprism
- Very well built quality
- Execellent hand held feel
- Auto WB and Auto Exposure are both very accurate
- Very good for video-taking. It's much better than Nikon and Canon in this aspect
- Although noise control on high ISO is much better than previous models, it still has some distance with Canon cameras.

- Weird outlook when I first saw it. Now it's better.
- The machine eats up more battery power because of the EVF. A vertical battery grip is a must for it.
- With its excellent quality, you cannot go without Zeiss Lens or G Lens.
- Less buttons and control dials than KM D7D, which I am still keeping because of its excellent body design.

This camera out passes other cameras with similar prices by offering a lot of extra features. Dual focusing systems, all time phase detection focusing on video recording mode, tiltable LCD screen, silent mode dial, full frame translucent technology with short shutter time lag and fair burst rate, AF range setting for all lenses, and What-You-See-is-What-You-Get real time shooting experience are all very good features you can find in the camera. With the excellent built quality, it can give me the confidence of taking pictures and video on any condition. If you are not a fan of any brands and be objective in comparing feature by feature and picture by picture, you will find that Sony has given you a worth-to-buy camera.

機身真係超輕的說
手感一流...易操控
觀景窗好用方便....夜晚睇得好清楚
AUTO MODE有超智能模式..叫人幫手影一兩張相時有用
色溫準
成像高色彩濃
又係相機又係DV...兩者出黎效果高

一粒電都幾快玩完
快門聲聽落怪怪地(呢D算唔算=.=)
高ISO表現雖然比上代好左...但比眼下既對手差
對焦點過於偏向中間
都冇咩喇...如果仲要講既...原裝送果條相機帶可唔可以重新設計過呀~.~

首先小弟有少少意見想提出...關於樓下位師兄
小弟由FUJI X100一跳就上左黎A99(用的是ZA 24-70)
如果講SHARP同成像...確實比部X100差少少...X100雖則係APSC...但機身本身既鏡頭係富士龍F2.0 35MM定焦鏡頭...24-70就算係蔡頭...講銳利度都要輸比富士龍既定焦...更何況師兄仲要搵部RX1黎比?...你唔搵支ZA F1.8 135MM試下?
入正題...用左部A99兩個月...喺蔡司鏡頭幫助下色水方面係唔需要擔心...只要光暗方面控制得好你要既顏色係可以比番你的(當然唔好同舊鏡白銀果D比-.-)..而個EVF觀景窗當我發現同MON既色水有分別時...亦發覺連個EVF都有得較色溫同亮度...至於轉盤方面真係幾就手...基本上掌心唔使郁黎郁去...淨係手指郁動就可以SET哂所有野...對焦唔覺得佢特別快...但個AF RANGE就真係好用...反MON就唔使講喇...呢樣野點都好過冇的...確實小弟去動漫展又多龍友企同一位置既時候...個MON扭得轉得就可以唔使同人逼得咁勁...唯獨是ISO控制真係直接輸比其他對手...C記6D喺雜訊方面都贏左部A99...睇黎SONY喺呢方面要著下手喇...但如果可以唔用太高ISO(<3200)既話...老實講...光暗位既處理唔比MARK3同D800E差...鏡頭試過借用幾支(G鏡同ZA鏡)...如果配用蔡司系列既話...得罪講句...顏色同成像比我朋友既N記FF機用N記金圈還要好(N記支持者勿打)...尤以小弟試用過支ZA F1.8 135定焦...強烈建議有A99既用家一定要試下呢支鏡...你會發覺A99如果可以影到咁...試過影下片...加支24-70又真係幾過癮...清晰度同流暢度完可以同其他同級相機講拜拜

對比起5d3同D800同級機唔算貴
個反mon真係好實用,尤其多人嘅地方，舉起部機唔洗靠估
陽光猛都仲睇到
有自動蔡頭鏡玩
iso比起之前a850同900已經好好多
對焦快左
機身好揸手

Buffer少連拍幾快都無用
就算用快卡都無改善
影完6張停幾秒save相好慢
乜野影相熱情都無晒
個對焦系統明顯落後於人，集中晒係中間,個AF-D好過無
連a900年代雙十字中間對焦點都無埋
iso係改善左但仍被對手比下去

呢部機影靜態物件係好
動態就免問
加上Sony長鏡選擇少又貴,雜廠唔係無防震就無超聲波motor
支原廠584貴到無朋友，加多三皮夠入人地頂級機身加原廠584都得
邊吸引到人買,亦最終令我雙修算數

1)色調靚,膚色準確
2)"平價"Full Frame
3)Live view mon 流暢,方便極高及低角度拍攝,眼睛疲倦相對低,故此極少使用viewfinder,
4)對焦快及準
5)功能鍵方便易用
6)機身防震,鏡頭相對平宜,
7)拍片功能非常好,質素靚
8)內置水平儀實用
9)可套用舊有Minolta攝影配件

機身線條欠缺Sony品牌創意風格,如取機身線條硬朗(復古)設計,或可額外吸引一些崇尚品味買家。
個人認為如保留Minolta dynax 7D機身設計風格便完美,機身設計剛勁,功能鍵方便易用。

人和事皆無完美,只要你喜歡它的優點,那些缺點只會靠邊站,購買前多做調查,購買後何需抱怨。