展示第 1 - 10 項，共 11 項
優點:
可靠，主控及快制多，唔駛左set，右set,一㩒就係。
缺點:
低光環境， 表現追不上新cmos。不過一般室內光原，絶對合格。
評價:
今時今日，你會覺得是否有點out,但攞上手，感覺又不是，因操控真係勁！如果你用得到，真係愛不惜手，佢好似一部古董手波跑車，重而且需要主動操控，日間高速拍攝，可靠無失拖，個mon番睇相，唉！電腦番睇，wow! 軟件後制，正，因file 細，不過我就夠用，高iso其實不失禮。日間相就直情係好得。要print banner就不應用佢，因原設計係一部記者機，只求快，真！時實上佢係做得到。我先前用d2h,現今轉用d2hs,除無first error外，色水亦有改善，因為高bit數些少。
最後更新：2012-11-15 01:11:21
優點:
粒cmos好靚，立體感好強，顏色好靚，好有ccd feel，亦有菲林既感覺，由d80, d90, d300同呢部，只有D80同呢部成像實正。
缺點:
420萬像剛好夠用，冇corp相空間，所以佢雖然快打及save相快但完全不合生態用，用途係較有限制。iso 1600 以下可用。
評價:
高階機身，同入門級不能相比，同D300加直倒係完全兩樣嘢
同一支鏡D2hs出同d300出係吾同感覺，日光下係D2hs靚
當年機身d mon吾係聞相用，但返去用hd tv睇番會有驚人效果，個效果係D300俾吾到嗰種，我的檔案的蓮花就係用d2hs打的
舊機當然一定有缺點，但懂得懷舊也是一種藝術，如有平價二手不防感受一吓。
同一支鏡D2hs出同d300出係吾同感覺，日光下係D2hs靚
當年機身d mon吾係聞相用，但返去用hd tv睇番會有驚人效果，個效果係D300俾吾到嗰種，我的檔案的蓮花就係用d2hs打的
舊機當然一定有缺點，但懂得懷舊也是一種藝術，如有平價二手不防感受一吓。
最後更新：2012-10-22 03:40:29
優點:
因象素小raw 檔save 極之快,合金機身,耐用扎實,二手價位唔算太高.可以用返enel4a電,啲相立體感幾正,連拍極之爽,現今入門或中級機.絕非D2Hs班數
缺點:
象素小crop 相有限制,直出相個人覺得藍左啲,mon 色就真係麻麻
評價:
2005年嘅產品,當然唔可以同當今頂級機去做比較,以現今二手價數千元價位,個人覺得性價比十分唔錯,快門極之爽,對焦快狠準,8fps以而家黎計,一啲都唔失禮.
優點:
大把網上文章講，無需再講，一個字「正」
缺點:
1. ４百萬像低了少少，如果6百萬就好好多
2. PQ上有些少偏藍，但可set機就一就
2. PQ上有些少偏藍，但可set機就一就
評價:
年半前用$16500買了部勁新有保全齊D2xs(shutter count =100)，用落都好滿意，尤其是手感，但發覺WB唔太滿意，以及Noise在ISO800以上真是差dd(雖然唔是成日用咁高ISO)。總括而言直出唔執相就差少少。故此想準備上D3，故此$13000平出了部D2xs和兩支鏡。但由於心目中D3ニ手價未到，故些用住部D200+直倒，可惜心理上和手感上差好遠，故此想入部D2x(二手價八千左右)，但試過一兩部ニ手都唔是咁滿意。怎料看到有關D2hs的review和spec，都ok喎，因為以往用開D2xs都是用到6百萬或Raw，故此4百萬都可接受，咁啱有c-hing放，雖然價錢唔算平，$7xxx, shutter count 兩萬幾，但都新淨，加上全齊行貨，故此買了。雖然用了幾日，但以住用D2xs d feel 返曬來，並且測光和Noise control明顯好了，雖然是快了些，但我確得對比D2xs，這並不是太突出，而且無乜幾何影咁快！現在回復影相的滿足感及相片pq都好好！現在儲$，等上D3。小小Comment==>我曾借D3+LB5玩過幾日，但覺十分重，好吃力，反而D2xs/D2hs的重量輕好多，配搭起LB3或LB5都舒服好多，手感平衡方面都好好！但始終D3是full frame和效能上優勝好多。不過唔計D3，以$$$和功能來取捨D2xs和D2hs，我會選D2hs。
優點:
反應快, 連拍快。
NOISE CONTROL 好, ISO1600 都好少NOISE.
機身勁扎實, 絕對係一部一流既相機。
4MP, 放到BANNER SIZE, 易拉架一樣好SHARP好DETAIL。
執相勁快~~ 1GB卡影到300張 RAW, 強.
NOISE CONTROL 好, ISO1600 都好少NOISE.
機身勁扎實, 絕對係一部一流既相機。
4MP, 放到BANNER SIZE, 易拉架一樣好SHARP好DETAIL。
執相勁快~~ 1GB卡影到300張 RAW, 強.
缺點:
像素低, CROP相爭咁D
評價:
非常可靠的相機。慳電, NOISE CONTROL好, 反應快, 真係百發百中咁濟。
優點:
* Good noise control ( Improved from d2H).
* Accurate WB (Improved from d2H).
* Fast AF and shutter response. No lag at all.
* 8 fps
* 50-frame buffer (Improved from D2H)
* 100% viewfinder.
* Solid body.
* Fast workflow with small JPG size (1.8MB) and RAW size (3MB).
* Works with all Nikkor lenses, AF and MF.
* Long battery life.
* Accurate WB (Improved from d2H).
* Fast AF and shutter response. No lag at all.
* 8 fps
* 50-frame buffer (Improved from D2H)
* 100% viewfinder.
* Solid body.
* Fast workflow with small JPG size (1.8MB) and RAW size (3MB).
* Works with all Nikkor lenses, AF and MF.
* Long battery life.
缺點:
* Low 4MP, but sufficient for prints upto 12R.
* Dynamic range is quite tight.
* AF points are too far apart.
* Dynamic range is quite tight.
* AF points are too far apart.
評價:
Superb camera for fast action photography, now improved even further from the older D2H.
優點:
- very quich response
- good noise control
- solid body and very good handling
- Improvment LCD
- film like
- output file small but high quality
- unexpected "not too heavy"
- long battary life
- good noise control
- solid body and very good handling
- Improvment LCD
- film like
- output file small but high quality
- unexpected "not too heavy"
- long battary life
缺點:
- 4mp is not enough if you are going to crop
評價:
After using the "machine gun" couple of weeks, it's a proper time to write a review on my lovely D2Hs. After switching my device from D70s to D2Hs, it seems that the world of photography is totally changed, when you first get your machine on your hand and press the shutter bottom on the main body or the "build-in grip", you must be compelled to say, wow, unbelievable fast response and can't feel any time lag between every single shot. When you switch the mode from single shot to the continuous high speed, then you should prepare yourself to hold your machine steady, it is because you seem holding a machine gun
By the way, besides of the consideration of the "orthodox bloodline", the mature noise control and ultra-speed did attracted me to hunt for this rare camera, after all, one of the main reasons that impressed me as well was the film-like photo quality. Of course, it is subjective but it is the common feeling of the D2H's family. It is not only the reporter's camera but a fantastic one for everyone who like Nikon, some of the Nikonians afraid that 4mp is not enough for nowadays standard. I should say, it is a totally bullshit. Yes, I know 4mp is not enough for outputing a large photo in "technically" speaking, however, D2Hs could make it! Believe me, it is more than satisfactory.
To conclude, I won't believe in the enhancement of photo quality in terms of the limited hardware upgrade but I do believe that the reliable and high quality of the body could not be easily upgraded. Don't forget, up till now, D2 series still have their advantages of focusing and metering system, it can't be defeated by D200. If you claimed that it is a new model only in terms of size, good handling or so-called photo quality, it is not upgrading a great deal but just a "new model". Last but not least, how can you imagine a raw file is 2-3mb and high quality JPG is only 1-2mb in nowadays high mp's world? I finally got a machine that is perfectly matched with my outdated Centrino. Though I am not standing on the side of "ps" but at least I need to have a normal speed of converting the photo from Raw to JPG, what a terrible speed when the photos were taken by D70s!!!
By the way, besides of the consideration of the "orthodox bloodline", the mature noise control and ultra-speed did attracted me to hunt for this rare camera, after all, one of the main reasons that impressed me as well was the film-like photo quality. Of course, it is subjective but it is the common feeling of the D2H's family. It is not only the reporter's camera but a fantastic one for everyone who like Nikon, some of the Nikonians afraid that 4mp is not enough for nowadays standard. I should say, it is a totally bullshit. Yes, I know 4mp is not enough for outputing a large photo in "technically" speaking, however, D2Hs could make it! Believe me, it is more than satisfactory.
To conclude, I won't believe in the enhancement of photo quality in terms of the limited hardware upgrade but I do believe that the reliable and high quality of the body could not be easily upgraded. Don't forget, up till now, D2 series still have their advantages of focusing and metering system, it can't be defeated by D200. If you claimed that it is a new model only in terms of size, good handling or so-called photo quality, it is not upgrading a great deal but just a "new model". Last but not least, how can you imagine a raw file is 2-3mb and high quality JPG is only 1-2mb in nowadays high mp's world? I finally got a machine that is perfectly matched with my outdated Centrino. Though I am not standing on the side of "ps" but at least I need to have a normal speed of converting the photo from Raw to JPG, what a terrible speed when the photos were taken by D70s!!!
優點:
excelence bettery performance, good building quality.
缺點:
NIL
評價:
So good that I would like to get another one...
優點:
非一般的4百萬像
D2H 4M 晒到既相隨時大過你 S5PRO 既 12M
TOP BODY, 一秒 8 張, 就算影 RAW 都同你 JPG 差唔多
D2H 4M 晒到既相隨時大過你 S5PRO 既 12M
TOP BODY, 一秒 8 張, 就算影 RAW 都同你 JPG 差唔多
缺點:
成日冇貨
評價:
好正，反應好快
手感好實淨
手感好實淨
