1. AF is fast; faster than you'd expect if you haven't used any serious professional Nikon lenses before.
2. AF is right on, as expected.
3. The 200-400mm f/4 VR AF-S has no visible distortion, which is extraordinary for a zoom.
4. Bokeh is usually neutral to nice.
5. The color rendition looks the same as my other recent Nikkor lenses.
6. Most men can hand-hold this. That's why it has VR. The zoom and focus controls are right where you want them. The 200-400mm is an easy lens to use, and just gets better the more you use it. The tripod collar doesn't come off, but you can use tools to remove the foot.
7. Oddly, this crazy lens does macro, too.
8. It's sharp at f/4, and seems to improve just a tiny bit at f/5.6, from which point it's just crazy sharp.
9. Zooming is precise and slow. There's a huge zoom ring and a lot of glass to move for only a 2:1 zoom range.
顯示： 1 - 1 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
The 200-400mm VR is a seven-pound (3.2kg) hulk of finesse and precision. You have to feel it to believe it. It is a huge, expensive lens for people with special needs. Some people would much rather get closer to my subjects than have to stand back and shoot with this beast.
You people know who you are, and I doubt you'll be disappointed if you buy this zoom. The only gotcha is if you're shooting lines of trees from a distance, in which case, wide-open, my borrowed sample was softer on one side. For normal uses, there never is anything in focus on the side so I didn't see any problems with real photos. If you're shooing landscapes you may be happier with Nikon's fixed super-teles, like the manual focus ones you can buy used a lot cheaper than these modern AF-S VR lenses. If you're shooting action, you want this 200-400.
The 200-400 VR is far sharper than using a teleconverter on a shorter lens like the 70-200mm VR.
You people know who you are, and I doubt you'll be disappointed if you buy this zoom. The only gotcha is if you're shooting lines of trees from a distance, in which case, wide-open, my borrowed sample was softer on one side. For normal uses, there never is anything in focus on the side so I didn't see any problems with real photos. If you're shooing landscapes you may be happier with Nikon's fixed super-teles, like the manual focus ones you can buy used a lot cheaper than these modern AF-S VR lenses. If you're shooting action, you want this 200-400.
The 200-400 VR is far sharper than using a teleconverter on a shorter lens like the 70-200mm VR.
評價:
The 200-400mm f/4 VR AF-S is a legendary len. When you pay over $40,000 for a lens from Nikon, you get one heck of a lens in more ways than just optical quality.
The 200-400 VR is far sharper than using a teleconverter on a shorter lens like the 70-200mm VR.
The 200-400 VR is far sharper than using a teleconverter on a shorter lens like the 70-200mm VR.
1
