產品瀏覽紀錄

整體得分

外觀設計
3.7 星 (良好)
功能及特色
3.7 星 (良好)
操作及性能
3.7 星 (良好)
影像質素
3.7 星 (良好)
性價比
3.7 星 (良好)
平均得分 3.7 / 5 (由 29 個評分計算得出)
5
cklim2012(11個心得)2014-11-25 16:00:15
推薦此產品使用了 2 年
超好用!
優點:
天涯鏡,一支鏡可以近影遠影,唔使換鏡。
因為唔使換鏡,帶住去旅行最方便,
減少換鏡時灰塵入侵的機會
AF meet expectation
有 image stabilizer
缺點:
當相機向下,鏡頭zoom ring會受地心吸力拉長
不過有個lock 可以lock 住

光圈唔夠大

不是恆定光圈,zoom 遠光圈會變細

EF-S 接唔到full frame body
評價:
以前買500D 跟kit lens 18-200mm
比依家的新機kit lens 18-135mm好好多。
用過咁多鏡,18-200真係一支超好用的鏡。
最後更新:2014-11-25 16:02:03
5
louischoi(17個心得)2011-07-24 21:07:08
推薦此產品使用了 1 個月
優點:
- Fast focusing, reasonably fast in low light
- Smaller in size (compared to my Tamron 18-270 VC)
- Larger aperature at tele side (5.6, vs 6.3 of the Tamron)
- Sharp! and much sharper indeed! (compared to the Tamron)
- Better build quality (compared to the Tamron)
缺點:
- No USM (come on Canon, Nikon provides AF-S to their 18-200 VRII !!!)
- Focusing ring moves during AF (but I can live with that)
- Not cheap
- Hood not provided
- Tele end is sharper than the wide end
- The zoom mechanism gets loose quickly and extends automatically (the lock is useless since it can only lock at the wide end, I wish I could have a lock that can lock freely at any focal length)
評價:
My comments are mainly based on comparison between the Tamron 18-270 VC and the Canon. I must say that before using the Canon I was satisfied with the Tamron. The tele end sharpness of the Tamron is just so-so but it is accetable after some PS. The pictures from the Canon are sharp even looked at original size. Of course we are not comparing with the SWIS II which is unfair. I have used many lenses from both Canon and Nikon and this 18-200 IS does worth every penny! For those who want to carry just one lens with you (especially in these hot days) you should consider this lens seriously. I highly recommend this lens (especially when you are comparing it with the Tamron)
4
pachuleung(3個心得)2011-02-08 23:49:21
推薦此產品使用了 6 個月
優點:
1. fast focus;
2. easy to manage;
3. good enough for beginer;
缺點:
1. no USM;
2. expensive;
3. quality is not the best;
評價:
For beginer, it is good enough for all applications : no matter for group photos, outdoor, indoor, close up, children ..... , however, quality cannot match with other professional portrait lens.
2
mankei01(8個心得)2010-11-06 23:46:29
推薦此產品使用了 2 年
優點:
天涯鏡, 金屬Mount , 有IS
缺點:
色水麻麻, 較重, 無hood送
評價:
天涯鏡, 旅行方便, 可以一用
3
Mercedes Benz(1個心得)2010-08-04 12:25:36
推薦此產品使用了 1 年
優點:
對焦快,is 表現好好,72mm,鏡身硬淨比較pro,有lock,對焦靜,用50d 無黑角。
缺點:
居不送hood,較重,180-200mm時效果不明顯,色一般,不夠sharp,室內暗位不能對焦。
評價:
一句到尾,用得天涯鏡,質素一定不及其他鏡,只是考慮廠品牌,價錢,其實用性。
我就滿意這支野表現,比較之下,咪覺貴law,但我也仍會用canon 的。

相信用50d 用家更會接受這支天涯鏡,除黑角都重要啊!
1
victoryvictory(10個心得)2010-07-09 16:44:47
不推薦此產品使用了 1 年
優點:
This lens does it all for Canon's 1.6x consumer DSLRs. It focuses super fast, zooms from wide-angle to super-telephoto, and gets close enough for macro shots. It could be the only lens you ever need for most Canon DSLRs.
缺點:
On this Canon, the AF mechanism is far more primitive. It's quite a pain to have to stay clear of the focus ring during AF, and have to move a switch to get to manual focus. Poo.
評價:
It\\\'s a great lens, but has one potentially serious flaw in the AF system for many users.

The Canon 18-200 IS has the old AF system that moves the focus ring as the AF works, so you have to keep your hands off of it as it moves.

Worse, cannot turn this ring for manual focus unless you first move a switch to disengage the AF motor.

This is a serious shortcoming compared to Nikon\\\'s 18-200mm VR, on which you the focus ring never turns unless you move it, and which you may move at any time for instant manual override.

On this Canon, the AF mechanism is far more primitive. It\\\'s quite a pain to have to stay clear of the focus ring during AF, and have to move a switch to get to manual focus. Poo.
4
felix_kyuubi(9個心得)2010-02-07 11:45:27
推薦此產品使用了 12 個月
優點:
1. IS勁,好夠用
2. 天涯鏡要有既佢都有,影乜都有一定水準,方便喜歡"一鏡走天涯"朋友
3. 金屬mount夠硬淨
4. 黑角屬可接受範圍
5. 對焦速度快
6. 72mm口徑
缺點:
1. 好重,雖然天涯鏡黎講重係可接受,但用家總想佢再輕D
2. 光圈唔夠大,18mm去到f/2.8我已經好滿足(雖然呢個要求好不智)
3. 唔用時一定要上Lens Lock,否則Lens極易滑出
4. 成像唔算太好,D相唔夠利,D色徧淡
5. 夜晚&室內唔打閃真係好惡影
6. 價錢好貴!!咁既價錢應該有USM啦!!!
評價:
呢支係我第一支LENS,初學影相時連450D 購入,一路唔打心得係因為小弟自覺影相水平唔夠,去到今日小弟都覺得勉強CARRY到呢支LENS,所以先提起勇氣打用後感.

總括黎講,呢支鏡係"一鏡走天涯"既完美選擇,因為影乜都OK,但如果係鍾意聞相既師兄,呢支鏡既成像質素一定唔能夠滿足你地,因為真係麻麻地.
3
suntong613(2個心得)2009-12-12 13:53:10
持中性態度使用了 5 個月
優點:
1. 約11倍的變焦.好實用
2.IS有料到..(試過15分之1秒200MM無問題)
3.對焦能力不俗
缺點:
1.如果加個USM上去就更好
2.伸縮鏡好易吸塵
3.光圈稍細
4.重...18-55+55-250仲輕過佢
5.貴...只係吾洗成日換鏡就貴咁多
評價:
跟500D KIT SET買入
講成像..比我買18-55+55-250好過!
用左吾夠半年就買左17-40取代左18-200既標準RANGE
準備賣出換小小白IS...
比我重新選擇...呢支我吾會簡..寧願用副廠18-250
3
iWaWa(6個心得)2009-09-29 17:47:14
推薦此產品使用了 6 個月
優點:
天涯鏡:近攝又得,遠攝又得,不用換鏡,白天出外影人影景都挺方便,不用帶兩三支鏡,女士帶出街,一機一鏡放在一個小背袋或側袋,都幾輕鬆!
黑角:用50D來影,給100分啦。 不只我一個講,就連測試報告都未發現有問題,放在其他機款就未試過,不知道。 希望各位 CHING 抽空給些意見,請補充一下吧。
重量:咁長支鏡,有成十幾塊GLASSES係入面,我覺得可以接受。
廣角有LOCK:唔影相手放低時,LOCK住支鏡就唔使滑出來,很好的設計。
鏡身長度:我覺得剛剛好,跟機一齊放入個細袋都掂。
缺點:
光圈細,光線黑D都要開閃燈。
對焦算很快,但銳利度就不高。
微距:買微距鏡啦。
色澤: 在晚上用內閃影人,有點偏紅。 用外閃影就很好!
加了個HOOD,再用內閃影野,連個HOOD 影都影埋出來,都係不要跟好了。
貴:鏡利度成咁,話佢唔貴都幾難!
評價:
我是買50D KIT SET 的,想KIT SET 支鏡會平些少。 現在感覺有點笨,剛剛看到CANON 話10月會出支15-85 IS USM新鏡后我就想換了。 我沒有放過二手鏡經驗,但手機就試過,知道一般都要成套連盒咁比曬佢, 唉! 呢支套裝鏡都唔知二手收唔收?!

說說銳利度,為了證實是鏡本身質素問題或是自己手振問題,就跟著攝影雜誌咁試了下面幾種方法去影,把50D全程裝在腳架上影同一物件:-
1.在機內調對焦點試影;
2.怏門由60至125一級級去影;
3.光圈由F8一級級調大到F3.5去影;
4.用AUTO Mode 去影;
5.用P Mode去影;
到最後,其實自己要乜終於知道了! 現在,無論在室內,白天或晚上,都一定帶住支外閃。 這樣影出來D相,質量才放心好多了!! 剛剛掃了一下這支 EF-S 15-85 IS USM 新鏡,已經有一個用家心得發佈了,說銳利度NUMBER 1喎,到貨時一定匆去LOOK LOOK!

雖然此鏡銳利度只屬入門級,但以天涯鏡方便程度來作考慮的話,不要他選,忠於原色,我推介買原廠這一支吧!!
2
1.21.6(7個心得)2009-06-18 18:19:06
不推薦此產品使用了 10 日
優點:
- 18-200就係18-200, 好似上至飛機下至街拍都唔駛換鏡
- 硬正過18-55 (算唔算? - -")
- 72mm filter威過曬58mm
- 金屬mount
- IS有料到
- Zoom有lock
- f/3.5-5.6, 好過Sigma -f/6.3
- 定頭, 唔轉
- 黑角以天涯鏡黎講唔錯
缺點:
- 呢支18-200係我用過咁多支(包括Nikon, Sigma, Tamron)最差o個支, 變形幾乎係..... (!) 影人影樓影直綫(絕)不可用
- 個grip真係好好好好好好好好好...硬正, 摸上手無黎質感
- 72mm lor唔該, 整個77mm黎正常d好唔好-3-
- Nikon, Sigma都有AF-S/ HSM, 呢個竟然...????
- 反差+色彩嘛嘛
- 膠.........
- 長焦距容易迷焦
- 都係Canon老病- 連埋個hood駛死咩....
- 五千大洋??????
評價:
比我揀我實揀Sigma 18-250, 話就話光圈細d, 成像、對焦方面絕對好過呢支原厰鏡,手感都好過原厰, 仲送埋hood *v*

呢次Canon認真要收皮喇...........

為產品評分

為產品評分

以 5 星為最高評分,你對 Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS 的評分是?

樣本照片 (9 張相片)