- 重量比較C記嗰支簡直天堂與地獄
- 對焦快，就算300mm對一條線都冇遲滯
- VR超強，1/3命中率超過7成
- 成像天涯鏡嚟講超班
展示第 1 - 10 項，共 30 項
優點:
缺點:
暫時未發掘到.
評價:
用過C記嘅28-300同70-300(non-DO)，成像好過支28-300但好吾過支70-300. 用喺D7000上平衡感吾錯. 小弟鐘意拉近啲嘢嚟影所以吾介意冇咗wide. 450mm 夠晒用. 係我用過嘅天涯鏡IQ最好嘅一支.
優點:
1. 輕巧, 有師兄話佢重, 但如果同canon一比就已經輕好多好多
2. 成色, 散景, 紫邊等等都ok, 以天涯鏡黎講, 算係好好了
2. 成色, 散景, 紫邊等等都ok, 以天涯鏡黎講, 算係好好了
缺點:
1. 個hood如果用上有個掣禁果款hood會好好多, 因為去旅行成日碰來碰去, 真係幾易甩
2. 200-300mm一段, 對焦慢(只比A20好少少), 成日對唔到焦
2. 200-300mm一段, 對焦慢(只比A20好少少), 成日對唔到焦
評價:
出街第一日就已經帶佢返屋企, 然後帶佢去足一個月旅行, 影咗成3,000張相
優點:
佢既優點緊係28-300mm既距離
去旅行真係一支鏡可以搞掂晒
有4級防震,價錢又合理,仲要係FF第一支天涯鏡,可算是既好
夠光既地方影出來既相,同什麼N鏡只係差少少,如果用肉眼睇,跟本唔差太多
去旅行真係一支鏡可以搞掂晒
有4級防震,價錢又合理,仲要係FF第一支天涯鏡,可算是既好
夠光既地方影出來既相,同什麼N鏡只係差少少,如果用肉眼睇,跟本唔差太多
缺點:
有點兒重
同埋ZOON既時候會容易入塵
冇大光圈(支支天涯鏡都有呢個缺點)
顏色一定冇N鏡咁實,一分錢一分貨,你有既野佢冇(距離方便),佢有既野你冇(納米結晶塗膜,大光圈)
唔係日本貨
同埋ZOON既時候會容易入塵
冇大光圈(支支天涯鏡都有呢個缺點)
顏色一定冇N鏡咁實,一分錢一分貨,你有既野佢冇(距離方便),佢有既野你冇(納米結晶塗膜,大光圈)
唔係日本貨
評價:
如果要求唔高,其實呢支鏡真係好夠用,好過其他D天涯鏡,呢支係由3.5-5.6,其他雜牌係去度6.3架,冇呢支咁大光圈,遮光罩唔係太方便,比較大,因為佢係77mm,女士用會比較吃力,三腳架一定要夠穩定,如果唔係頭重腳輕
優點:
I just bought this lens 2 weeks ago and has used it many times during these two weeks.
1. The lens body is strongly built and suitable for heavy daily use.
2. It is sharp even wide open, at all focal length from 28-300mm.
3. It is even sharper then the 70-300 VR at 300mm
4. It is sharp with very good bokeh for taking portrait.
1. The lens body is strongly built and suitable for heavy daily use.
2. It is sharp even wide open, at all focal length from 28-300mm.
3. It is even sharper then the 70-300 VR at 300mm
4. It is sharp with very good bokeh for taking portrait.
缺點:
1. It is a bit heavy, 800g. If you take it out with a D700 or D3s body, plus a flash light, the total weight is quite heavy to carry around all day.
2.The linear distortion is quite seriously. But it is normal for a long range zoom lens like it.
3. The maximum aperture is quite small. But what could you expect from a long range zoom below $8000.
4. Canon also produces a similar range long zoom , but the price is $16XXX !!! Much expensive than this lens produced by Nikon !
2.The linear distortion is quite seriously. But it is normal for a long range zoom lens like it.
3. The maximum aperture is quite small. But what could you expect from a long range zoom below $8000.
4. Canon also produces a similar range long zoom , but the price is $16XXX !!! Much expensive than this lens produced by Nikon !
評價:
I like this lens very much and I will carry it in my bag with my D700. I will sold my other midrange to long range zoom in the coming months.
優點:
平靚正!方便夾大件!早買平幾舊!遲買貴幾舊!高清到連面毛都睇到! 小弟未轉FF..個焦段真係好到呢!仲唔會點變形!
77mm filter
77mm filter
缺點:
一定要夠光!唔夠光有防震都幫唔到幾多!
對焦時!吱吱有雜聲!
唔係恆定 F4 光圈。(貪念一點而已)
太方便!其它鏡相對性入了冷宮(大光圈除外,這地位未能替代)
對焦時!吱吱有雜聲!
唔係恆定 F4 光圈。(貪念一點而已)
太方便!其它鏡相對性入了冷宮(大光圈除外,這地位未能替代)
評價:
一見到就拿了回家!第一支天涯鏡..感覺無別家那麼搵笨..相對性超平。咁高解像真係無話可說..相對其它鏡好抵買。
優點:
手功同質感都好過18-200
個lock 幾就手
價ok (18-200 一出都甘上下價位)
77 filter, 心理上開心d. cpl 唔使買過
防震幾有用
夠大支.. 上d3平衡感幾好
個lock 幾就手
價ok (18-200 一出都甘上下價位)
77 filter, 心理上開心d. cpl 唔使買過
防震幾有用
夠大支.. 上d3平衡感幾好
缺點:
hood 好樣衰, 感覺上好怪
made in thailand
無 N
made in thailand
無 N
評價:
話明天涯鏡, PQ一定唔可以EXPECT太高, 但個RANGE夠方便. 去旅加支WIDE就夠晒.
等左甘耐終於有支FX天涯鏡, 我昨晚一炮過由CANON轉反NIKON 有好大因素係因為呢支, 同就快出果支 35 1.4.
等左甘耐終於有支FX天涯鏡, 我昨晚一炮過由CANON轉反NIKON 有好大因素係因為呢支, 同就快出果支 35 1.4.
優點:
1.) FX機終于有原厰天涯鏡了，不要跟我說24-120 Nano是另外一支天涯鏡
2.) 出閑trip不用大三元咯！
3.) 加支24.4或14-24剛剛好！
4.) 同738VR都是沙瓦迪cup貨，不過就PQ好很多，也不像738VR支支有塵
2.) 出閑trip不用大三元咯！
3.) 加支24.4或14-24剛剛好！
4.) 同738VR都是沙瓦迪cup貨，不過就PQ好很多，也不像738VR支支有塵
缺點:
1.) No Nano
2.) Zoom鏡筒分兩節，容易入塵
3.) 泰國製造
4.) 口徑小D更好，雖然我都有不少77mm B+W filters
5.) 同A20N II比，重50%
6.) 價格就見仁見智，到底沙瓦迪cup貨
7.) 落燈就要飛燈咯
8.) 遮光罩對tele段可以說係裝飾品
2.) Zoom鏡筒分兩節，容易入塵
3.) 泰國製造
4.) 口徑小D更好，雖然我都有不少77mm B+W filters
5.) 同A20N II比，重50%
6.) 價格就見仁見智，到底沙瓦迪cup貨
7.) 落燈就要飛燈咯
8.) 遮光罩對tele段可以說係裝飾品
評價:
昨晚剛入貨，人有我有，幾十支鏡，支支要講理由唔係好唔得閑，初步覺得FX天涯鏡一支，同A20N II比，三個字：虛榮心，如果說重50%更有手感，77mm filter更霸氣，係阿Q精神，或者相的PQ是好些，但是問我差多少，我就莫宰羊了，不過D3X唔方配震騰騰咩，幾cheap吖！完全為face，我絕對係個勢利小人。
優點:
Reasonable price
Reasobable size and weight
Sharp and Fast
With VRII
Standard 77mm filter for professional lens
Reasobable size and weight
Sharp and Fast
With VRII
Standard 77mm filter for professional lens
缺點:
Distortion is quite visible
May not be suitable for taking architectural building, walls, straight edges
May not be suitable for taking architectural building, walls, straight edges
評價:
This FF lens with above average PQ, Sharpness and Focus Speed (mounted on D3) can satisfy most semi-professional photographers. The price in the $7-8K range is quite reasonable for a N lens. Excellent for travel around uses.
