Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

評測報告

實拍照片

I really don't understand why people still choose Canon. Canon's technology is always far more primative than Nikon regardless of its worse body handling. Canon still has no full-color RGB meters in any of its SLRs. Canon just started to have wireless flash on its entry DSLR (600D) while all Nikon's entry ones have long been having such option. Canon still doesn't have lateral color fringe correction on any of its DSLRs including their professional ones as what all Nikon's ones have now.

I really don't understand why people still choose Canon. Canon's technology is always far more primative than Nikon regardless of its worse body handling. Canon still has no full-color RGB meters in any of its SLRs. Canon just started to have wireless flash on its entry DSLR (600D) while all Nikon's entry ones have long been having such option. Canon still doesn't have lateral color fringe correction on any of its DSLRs including their professional ones as what all Nikon's ones have now.

I really don't understand why people still choose Canon. Canon's technology is always far more primative than Nikon regardless of its worse body handling. Canon still has no full-color RGB meters in any of its SLRs. Canon just started to have wireless flash on its entry DSLR (600D) while all Nikon's entry ones have long been having such option. Canon still doesn't have lateral color fringe correction on any of its DSLRs including their professional ones as what all Nikon's ones have now.

- Excellent build quailty, very soild feel;
- easy to use; all control buttons are well-placed and highly configurable (尤其是未有了5DII 極不 Professional 的 Exposure Mode Dial !);
- very fast - both AF speed and shutter;
- good high ISO performance, without any noticable noise even up to ISO1600;
- highly detailed image quality, its JPEGs were even sharper than 5DII (16MP in APS-H has, in fact, higher resoultion than 21mp in FF);

- not Full Frame ;
- color tone not as attractive as 5D II.

I changed from Nikon to Canon since EOS 1D Mk II N, switched to Full frame with the 5DII and now has switched back to APS-H with the Mk IV, the Mk IV is a top quality Professional camera that is as close to perfect as possible, well-shaped with excellent build quality and good ergonomics.

It has immense improvements in the followings :

- highly detailed image quality, esp. JPEGs - even sharper than 5DII;
- high ISO performance, no noticeable noise up to ISO1600;
- faster & more accurate AF.

手功精緻 ! 追求high-tech 又注重手功一族，一定愛不釋手 !

對焦好快, 質感好好, 一個字......(強).

貴......不過佢滿足到我既要求.....(抵)

由G10 - 7D - 5DII - 1D4完全沒有後悔, 早知一早就上1D4啦!

with all new technology....

APS-H not FF

I just wanna say those users shall not compare this brand new gear with 5DII. It is completely not fair as this is 1-Series.

1D mark iV is good but 5DII not really bad at all.

1D mark IV is APS-H but 5DII is FF gear ar!!

Beware「用家心得」的特點是以用家自己的角度，就產品的外觀設計、功能、操作性能、影像質素和整體表現等多方面進行評分，以反映該產品的特色、技術和表現，作為會員購買數碼相機前的「選購指南」。

很多

沒什麼

本身机是好，但唯一令我遺憾是此机經常走焦
一部是咁，兩部又係咁
究竟 Canon 攪什麼，頂級机都走焦，點用？？

High ISO

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``

OKOKOKOKOKOK