1.勁sharp,我之前用24-70一代,和它比,它的F2.8比一代sharp好多
它的F4大約等於一代F6.4咁sharp.
2.外形好靚, 型瀑! 成把必殺刀把一樣
3.防震一流,手持晚上影超ok, 一代唔可以手持, 一代比較鬆
4.重量分佈勁好,因為長,力量分散平均, 所以手持不會覺得太重
5.對焦好近,可當半支微距用
6.對焦超快, D5一按即到!!! 勁秋~
7. 防麈防水力極佳!
8. PQ極佳!
9. 超級立體感!
10. Made In Japan 做工非常好, 比一代好!
11. 變焦超順, 比一代順好多!
顯示： 1 - 6 (最新發表)
全面升級! 另一支未來可用超過十年嘅日用鏡皇!!!
優點:
缺點:
82mm filter超貴
遮光罩習慣點上鏡身後非常好用, 不會輕易甩出黎
冇乜缺點
遮光罩習慣點上鏡身後非常好用, 不會輕易甩出黎
冇乜缺點
評價:
有買貴冇買錯, 其實支鏡各方面都升格不少, 超值之選!
感覺同一代係完全另一支高級左嘅新鏡頭!!!
感覺同一代係完全另一支高級左嘅新鏡頭!!!
最後更新：2018-09-05 18:41:54
優點:
1）最顯著的改進是加入VR，以後夜攝亦不用調太高ISO
2）變焦環的焦距數字由上一代在變焦環下部改為上部，不會再被機身阻擋著
3）鏡尾的鏡片不像上一代般是固定的，而是隨著焦距改變而伸縮，雖然增加入塵風險，但也不像上一代般容易碰傷
4）維持著上代廣角時鏡身最長、遠端時鏡身最短，雖然這樣設計鏡身會很巨大，但加裝遮光罩時鏡身伸縮都在遮光罩內完成，有一定保護能力
5）對焦反應比上一代快；邊緣位置亦比上一代更出色
2）變焦環的焦距數字由上一代在變焦環下部改為上部，不會再被機身阻擋著
3）鏡尾的鏡片不像上一代般是固定的，而是隨著焦距改變而伸縮，雖然增加入塵風險，但也不像上一代般容易碰傷
4）維持著上代廣角時鏡身最長、遠端時鏡身最短，雖然這樣設計鏡身會很巨大，但加裝遮光罩時鏡身伸縮都在遮光罩內完成，有一定保護能力
5）對焦反應比上一代快；邊緣位置亦比上一代更出色
缺點:
1）重量突破1000G，即使D610/D750加裝上直倒，仍然是頭重尾輕
2）塑膠感重
3）價格可以比肩小黑六，多了六千多就是因為那個VR
2）塑膠感重
3）價格可以比肩小黑六，多了六千多就是因為那個VR
評價:
Nikon用家對於在標準變焦鏡皇加入VR都已經說了10年，但加入VR的代價，即使不是心水清的用家也一眼看出來了。可是，作為專業用家，它的確是無可取代，因為加入VR的它，已經不是一件工具，而是一件利器
優點:
Maximum aperture at f2.8 totally usable. Sharpness is beyond f4.5 from 24-120. I read from some sites saying that sharpness of both lenses are same relative to maximum aperture (like f2.8 from 24-70/2.8G has same sharpness as f4.0 from 24-120/4G, 4.0 to 5.6, etc). That earned 24-120 a lot of praises especially after the price drop. However this is not true anymore. 24-70/f2.8E is way sharper.
Good bokeh for general purpose. 70 mm @ f2.8 is better than 120 mm @ f4 in my eyes. The beautiful isolation of subject from background also helps perceived sharpness.
Fast auto focus even on D610. Hard to quantify but tracking of moving subject has certainly yielded more focused pictures.
Good bokeh for general purpose. 70 mm @ f2.8 is better than 120 mm @ f4 in my eyes. The beautiful isolation of subject from background also helps perceived sharpness.
Fast auto focus even on D610. Hard to quantify but tracking of moving subject has certainly yielded more focused pictures.
缺點:
Noticeably heavier, but not as heavy as thought. On D610, the weight distribution is better and thus doesn't feel much extra. However that's purely a feeling and time will tell.
This lens is big. With 82 mm barrel it is getting close to league of 70-200/2.8. The combo is a lot bigger and longer than with 24-120.
Distortion is worse at 24 mm; much worse. Lightroom helps but manual intervention is necessary at times.
This lens is big. With 82 mm barrel it is getting close to league of 70-200/2.8. The combo is a lot bigger and longer than with 24-120.
Distortion is worse at 24 mm; much worse. Lightroom helps but manual intervention is necessary at times.
評價:
Others:
Losing the range from 70-120 did not bother me as much as I thought. I was stupid enough to force myself in using up to only 70 mm for a period of time. Given the improved sharpness and better bokeh, if you publish to Facebook at resolution recommended, cropped 70 mm from 24-70 is as good or better than 120 mm from 70-120.
Vignetting is worse. Lightroom works great in this manner. However for me preview is not accurate at all (darker). I have vignetting correction turned off to squeeze extra buffer.
The hood is indeed hard to screw in or out in the beginning. But after a short while, either I got used to it or it just ran in. Don't see this as a problem in medium term or longer.
Final words:
VR + f2.8 works great under low lights like indoors and/or evening events, birthday parties, and family photos in these venues. Fast(er) autofocus is a bliss for shooting anything that moves: in my case, my kids. If all of the weight, size, and price tag do not bother you, this is simply the best mid range zoom one could get.
I didn't mention price; this lens is EXPENSIVE. I made up my mind when I knew I have lots of indoor and evening events coming. I was not satisfied with f4 from 24-120 and I needed solution to either bringing down ISO or up shutter. I knew I could sell this lens with little loss so I gave it a try. And then? The 24-70 hasn't been off my camera since (for 2+ months). I never hesitated to use f2.8 even in daylight for bokeh. In my humble opinion, if could afford, this is when money could buy you confidence (but not skill or composition, ha) and versatility.
Losing the range from 70-120 did not bother me as much as I thought. I was stupid enough to force myself in using up to only 70 mm for a period of time. Given the improved sharpness and better bokeh, if you publish to Facebook at resolution recommended, cropped 70 mm from 24-70 is as good or better than 120 mm from 70-120.
Vignetting is worse. Lightroom works great in this manner. However for me preview is not accurate at all (darker). I have vignetting correction turned off to squeeze extra buffer.
The hood is indeed hard to screw in or out in the beginning. But after a short while, either I got used to it or it just ran in. Don't see this as a problem in medium term or longer.
Final words:
VR + f2.8 works great under low lights like indoors and/or evening events, birthday parties, and family photos in these venues. Fast(er) autofocus is a bliss for shooting anything that moves: in my case, my kids. If all of the weight, size, and price tag do not bother you, this is simply the best mid range zoom one could get.
I didn't mention price; this lens is EXPENSIVE. I made up my mind when I knew I have lots of indoor and evening events coming. I was not satisfied with f4 from 24-120 and I needed solution to either bringing down ISO or up shutter. I knew I could sell this lens with little loss so I gave it a try. And then? The 24-70 hasn't been off my camera since (for 2+ months). I never hesitated to use f2.8 even in daylight for bokeh. In my humble opinion, if could afford, this is when money could buy you confidence (but not skill or composition, ha) and versatility.
優點:
1.) VR
2.) 氟coating
3.) 電磁光圈
4.) 鏡片組裝複雜咗，鏡片多5片，3片色散鏡片改1片非球面ED色散鏡片同2片ED色散鏡片
2.) 氟coating
3.) 電磁光圈
4.) 鏡片組裝複雜咗，鏡片多5片，3片色散鏡片改1片非球面ED色散鏡片同2片ED色散鏡片
缺點:
1.) 重
2.) 長
3.) filter口徑超大
4.) wide端變形嚴重
5.) 遮光罩勁難裝
2.) 長
3.) filter口徑超大
4.) wide端變形嚴重
5.) 遮光罩勁難裝
評價:
剛買1天，舊鏡trade補1皮，舊鏡用咗9年，抵唔抵見仁見智，有改進，也有因改善帶來的缺點：長、重、濶，到底擁有時間尚短，只牛刀小試，要月底上海螺溝才見真章。
優點:
1.十分sharp,我之前用24-120 F4,和它比,它的F2.8比24-120 的F4 仲要sharp
它的F6大約等於24-120的F8咁sharp.
2.外形好靚,成把劍咁
3.防震一流,手持晚上影ok
4.重量分佈佳,因為長,所以手持不會覺得太重
5.防水能力佳
6.對焦近,可當半支微距用
7.對焦極快
它的F6大約等於24-120的F8咁sharp.
2.外形好靚,成把劍咁
3.防震一流,手持晚上影ok
4.重量分佈佳,因為長,所以手持不會覺得太重
5.防水能力佳
6.對焦近,可當半支微距用
7.對焦極快
缺點:
1.鏡身重不是問題,但太長了,容易撞到
2.wide時變形嚴重
3.加埋閃光燈影人像時超重...
4.貴,但其他龍友見到會流口水 XD
2.wide時變形嚴重
3.加埋閃光燈影人像時超重...
4.貴,但其他龍友見到會流口水 XD
評價:
呢支鏡係後生仔/大隻佬的恩物,佢就好似楊過把玄鐵劍咁,強大但重.
另一方面,呢一支鏡可以影景,影人,影微距,一物三用,質素有80分.
只要你克服到體積和重量問題,呢把玄鐵劍你一定要擁有!!!
另一方面,呢一支鏡可以影景,影人,影微距,一物三用,質素有80分.
只要你克服到體積和重量問題,呢把玄鐵劍你一定要擁有!!!
不同凡響的鏡皇
優點:
1. 就算F2.8, 無論在24或70， 中央和邊緣都好sharp。聽見有其他人講新一代比上一代中央沒0甘 sharp，可能我沒用過第一代所以我好難有此看法。不過我就覺得加下已經好好。 如果再sharp或好似以前甘sharp我會問系唔系好事， 尤其是你影人的時候。反而搞番好d邊位，更爲重要！
2. 影像顔色唔會好誇好艷，比較自然
3. Nano coating 防flare一流
4. 對焦好快又準。搞到我覺得支舊24-85 VR好慢
5. 落足料， 其中有一塊非球玻璃系ED
6. Zoom和手動對焦環順暢。
7. VR好好用，好順。騰龍個VR跳得好厲害，望到頭暈眼花！
8. MIJ, well built.
2. 影像顔色唔會好誇好艷，比較自然
3. Nano coating 防flare一流
4. 對焦好快又準。搞到我覺得支舊24-85 VR好慢
5. 落足料， 其中有一塊非球玻璃系ED
6. Zoom和手動對焦環順暢。
7. VR好好用，好順。騰龍個VR跳得好厲害，望到頭暈眼花！
8. MIJ, well built.
缺點:
1. 太大支太重。點可能唔用翻多d膠parts。
2. 很貴，差不多三倍騰龍價錢。
3. 個hood設計唔好，不方便裝拆。卡住卡住個鏡身/filter
4. 電子光圈(可能系好處黎),擔心多個香爐多隻鬼!
5. 如果有個制lock住24mm更好
6. 一年保用太少了，話曬鏡皇黎wor！至少兩年啦收得甘貴！
2. 很貴，差不多三倍騰龍價錢。
3. 個hood設計唔好，不方便裝拆。卡住卡住個鏡身/filter
4. 電子光圈(可能系好處黎),擔心多個香爐多隻鬼!
5. 如果有個制lock住24mm更好
6. 一年保用太少了，話曬鏡皇黎wor！至少兩年啦收得甘貴！
評價:
好彩我系用D750.如果系用D4/5機皇，最好練定手力
