產品瀏覽紀錄

Sony DSLR-A350

你使用過此產品? 發表用家心得
顯示: 1 - 6 (最低評價)
3.7
Wain (1個心得) 於 2008-03-30 23:51:46
推薦此產品 (使用了 1 個月)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
Live view 很方便取景
防震很不錯
缺點:
眼部自动啓動很麻煥, 最好取淌
評價:
正~
2.1
leonyung (5個心得) 於 2009-11-11 10:11:11
持中性態度 (使用了 2 個月)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
價錢平
LIVE VIEW有時真係几方便
缺點:
連拍慢,
手感不好(可能我手大)
對焦偏慢, 閃光速度慢
評價:
全部牌子數碼單反都用過.第一次轉入SONY, 只因行街見到真係好平好平,就入左.用左一段時間感覺還算可以.
有的師兄話SONY鏡貴, 但的确是一分錢一分貨. CANON的鏡如果有質素的L鏡, 几時有平過?
比支KIT你, 用兩次就想換啦,所以應該公平小小看待SONY的"貴"
期待有A700的換代版本
3.7
mcca (5個心得) 於 2008-04-04 18:31:06
推薦此產品 (使用了 7 個月)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
1/ good value with reasonable functions
2/ live view makes framing easier
缺點:
1/ picture saving takes too long
2/ slow continous shotting, but that's not important to me as i dont shot sports
3/ in full M-mode, the control dial could either be Aperture or Shutter only
4/ with the live view LCD, i don't think u'll ever be interested to look at that tiny viewfinder
評價:
had been using nikon since FM2 to F6 then D70/D2H/D200, finally made a breakthrough of buying sony. very satisfied with its performance concerning its low price. even 450D is 1k more expensive than it.

overall, it is a reasonably priced camera which takes good pictures. i don't see a reason to pay 2 times or 3 times the money to buy a super camera, which in reality, i will not be using most of the functions. (except i'm a photojournalist shooting sports or animals)
最後更新:2008-04-04 18:49:21
2.2
ayanan (2個心得) 於 2011-02-14 00:22:25
不推薦此產品 (使用了 2 年)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
反 mon
缺點:
防震很差. 已經維修兩次. 每次要付 HK$1200.
評價:
我现在用索尼 A350,但很後悔, 應該用佳能會好些.
3.9
milka (3個心得) 於 2008-08-16 02:44:45
推薦此產品 (使用了 1 個月)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
1. 價錢平 ( 分期 $6444 買 double lens kit)
2. 對焦快、live view 反應快
3. LCD monitor 可以多角度上下移動,令取景更加靈活
4. 支緩以色溫數值設定白平衡
5. 防震功能強勁
6. 好揸手...墜手...
缺點:
缺點:

1. 快門聲太大
2. ISO 800 noise 已經明顯,再較高 d 就好難接受
3. 連拍速度只有每秒 2.5 張
4. 原廠配件比較貴
5. 副廠產品亦不多...
6. 不能單手開機...轉mode的圓型輪掣在左邊...不太方便
7. 長鏡 的 kit len 唔太夠遠...亦唔夠 wide
8. 不停影的話好快手累...
9. 閃燈位太低...以至有黑影
評價:
我是單反新手...這是我第一部單反機...
我也是抄錄其他師兄用後的心得...再加些個人意見

感受:對於我來說...暫時覺得不錯...我只擔心當覺得呢部機唔用時....升級又局住係用返 sony....因為要放機都唔易...
3.9
Clarence Tsang (38個心得) 於 2008-09-27 20:34:20
持中性態度 (使用了 1 個月)
外觀設計
功能
操作性能
影像質素
整體評分
優點:
- High resolution
- True live view function and titiled LCD is good for any shooting environment
- CCD Super Steady Shot function saves me a lot of money to buy expensive anti-shake lens
- Cheap
- Good with its vertical grip
缺點:
- Building quality is worse than A100. It is more plastic and toy like.
- Too small in size so you must use it with vertical grip to have a better handling of the camera
- The built-in flash is too low in its position which makes it almost not usable
- The function of manual focus after auto-focus in A100 is not available anymore
- The rotate function to play pictures is much more complicated than the A100
- I still like the two rotation knobs in A100. Now there is only one
- It is too slow for continuous shooting, especially when it is under live view mode
- A lot of noise when the ISO is just a bit higher
評價:
I used A100 before A350 and I bought it second hand just because of the live view function which can be user friendly for my wife and friends who do not know traditional photo shooting very much. In general, it is a good camera and has a very good price/value ratio. But it is better that you use it with its vertical grip and an external flash. But I would say apart from the new feature, it is worse than the A100, perhaps it is because A100 is a design made by Minolta, instead of Sony.