圖像色彩豐滿，層次美麗。有菲林感覺。
兼容 ai F mount 手動鏡頭有光圈讀數。
加手柄後手感一流。
簡單，純攝影。
展示第 1 - 10 項，共 82 項
無可替代
優點:
缺點:
暫時無發現。
評價:
我等待了 Full frame 10年, 再又研究了一年，比較了很多 FULL FRAME DSLR 照片 的畫質，最後決定了D700.
隨著感應器技術的進步，往後很難再找到12MP 的相機。高像素不等於好畫質。
在這科技快速更新的時代，質量好的相機難復再。 希望來日有多餘$$$，多買一部做後備。
隨著感應器技術的進步，往後很難再找到12MP 的相機。高像素不等於好畫質。
在這科技快速更新的時代，質量好的相機難復再。 希望來日有多餘$$$，多買一部做後備。
D3縮小版
優點:
可用返D300s直倒，鋁合金專業機身，全幅感光相片高質有保證，操控方便加直倒更好揸手，但重量勁過D4……
缺點:
手揸位不夠深，機重，冇双咭，
評價:
D3輕量版，功能和相質有7成功力，本人有用D3s，比并過質素
12年機今日用都吾失禮，續航穩定耐撞赢宜家無反機
12年機今日用都吾失禮，續航穩定耐撞赢宜家無反機
最後更新：2020-04-16 15:35:02
回到初戀
優點:
5K有交易
缺點:
虛榮唔到
評價:
四年前第一部nikon就係D700。E部襟用。平到就到貼晒地。對焦範圍廣過D6X0 & D750。連拍快過D810 DDD。畫質當然唔可以同D810比。但700用G鏡定焦有得同D810比吓。實際追焦方面又同D810差無幾。noise我就咁比，最好D750>D810>DF&D4>D800E>D700&D7100咁!
D700嘅重量用料，其實代表當年nikon係比咗幾多心機!
要nikon。又要FF。又要質素好用。又要平。D700係我平玩一物。。。。
D700嘅重量用料，其實代表當年nikon係比咗幾多心機!
要nikon。又要FF。又要質素好用。又要平。D700係我平玩一物。。。。
D700 平靚正, 物超所值
優點:
- 影像質素一流, 影出黎D相同新出相機比真係差吾多
- 51点對焦
- 3寸mon已經夠大夠清
- 有nikon 優良血統, 夠SHARP
- ISO 1600 仍然好細緻
- 有机身 motor, 對焦快狠準
- 有飛燈
- 觀景器夠大
- 义滿電, 夠影成千張
- 操作順手 (快設定 ISO, WB, 頂MON, 雙轉盤)
- 該有的功能都有
- 1 / 8000s快門
- 影人像顏色討好
- 51点對焦
- 3寸mon已經夠大夠清
- 有nikon 優良血統, 夠SHARP
- ISO 1600 仍然好細緻
- 有机身 motor, 對焦快狠準
- 有飛燈
- 觀景器夠大
- 义滿電, 夠影成千張
- 操作順手 (快設定 ISO, WB, 頂MON, 雙轉盤)
- 該有的功能都有
- 1 / 8000s快門
- 影人像顏色討好
缺點:
- ISO 2000 開始有 noise
- 没有拍片功能, 不過我無所謂, 因為用單反來拍片, 會傷机縮短快門壽命
- 得單 CF card 插, 没有SD card 普及
- 得1200萬像, 有點過時
- 没有拍片功能, 不過我無所謂, 因為用單反來拍片, 會傷机縮短快門壽命
- 得單 CF card 插, 没有SD card 普及
- 得1200萬像, 有點過時
評價:
本人已經用了D700 六年, 這部相機可以説是當年Nikon 佳作, 51点對焦快狠準, 影人像顏色討好, 電池持續力強, 論性價比佢係超值, 我寧願慳番D機$, 買枝鏡王好過.
我手上四枝Nikon靚鏡 (50 1.4G, 85 1.4D, 24-70 F2.8, 70-200 F2.8 VRII LB6) 用係D700上都能夠充份發揮鏡王威力, 最後我建議想買入二手D700 的朋友, 這部机確實是物超所值, 如果已經擁有這部机的朋友, 我建議買你枝靚鏡好過換机
我手上四枝Nikon靚鏡 (50 1.4G, 85 1.4D, 24-70 F2.8, 70-200 F2.8 VRII LB6) 用係D700上都能夠充份發揮鏡王威力, 最後我建議想買入二手D700 的朋友, 這部机確實是物超所值, 如果已經擁有這部机的朋友, 我建議買你枝靚鏡好過換机
非常好用!
優點:
用了幾年，用DX的定焦鏡出來的質素很高，顏色相當自然，無FX咁重咁大，但質素完全可以接受。
缺點:
可以話無
評價:
要用定焦鏡才能體驗到高質素，例如: 35mm f1.8 dx 已經好過kit鏡一條街
優點:
ISO up to 4000 still can be use.
51 focus point better than competitor.
Add MB-10 Plus D3 battery can up to 9FPS.
Focusing is a bit faster than D300.
51 focus point better than competitor.
Add MB-10 Plus D3 battery can up to 9FPS.
Focusing is a bit faster than D300.
缺點:
The View Finder is not 100% , Cannot get the accurate composition. other than that is perfect .
評價:
I have been using for 6 months , the camera is very solid build and the ISO is very impressive me even I am shooting in low light enviroment . going to upgrade D3s
hope can share something in the near future.
The Price compare to D300 or D300s is not that much , so I encourage people
who want to upgrade from D90 / D80 .... can jump to D700. save your time and money.
,because FX is future format camera.
hope can share something in the near future.
The Price compare to D300 or D300s is not that much , so I encourage people
who want to upgrade from D90 / D80 .... can jump to D700. save your time and money.
,because FX is future format camera.
優點:
1. Full frame can give shadow depth of field using shorter focal length
2 Auotfocus is fast and reliable
3. White balance is accurate
4. 5ps was enough for me
5. Dust does not stick to CMOS
6. ISO is useable up to6400
7. Viewfinder is bright and can use manual focus for my pets
8 Body is robust and durable
9. The electronics inside is also reliable
10. No underexposed or overexposed
2 Auotfocus is fast and reliable
3. White balance is accurate
4. 5ps was enough for me
5. Dust does not stick to CMOS
6. ISO is useable up to6400
7. Viewfinder is bright and can use manual focus for my pets
8 Body is robust and durable
9. The electronics inside is also reliable
10. No underexposed or overexposed
缺點:
1. No internal CCD shift vibration reduction
2. Body is heavy
3. 90% viewfinder
4 Picture quality is not so colourful than I expect
5. The built-in flash could not be used 40mm below
2. Body is heavy
3. 90% viewfinder
4 Picture quality is not so colourful than I expect
5. The built-in flash could not be used 40mm below
評價:
When I switch from my E510 with leica 14-50mm and 35-100mm to D700 with 24-70mm.
I found that no camera is perfect. First of all, the E-510 with CCD vibration can be used up to 1/5 sec using 14-50mm at ISO 400. But D700 used 1/20 at ISO 1600 cannot give steady picture since there was no vibration reduction and the shutter speed must be higher than 1/20. A tripod must be used and there was no bragain.
On the other hand D700 can take indoor photos without flash and ISO is very useful at 3200. I can say D700 ISO 3200 = ISO 400 of E-510.
Below is my feeling which might be not widely accepted by others.
The 24-70mm lens using D700 can provide shadow depth of field and indoor photos in which the olympus can only attain using longer focal length with large aperture. This is the main reason for using full-frame together with low noise at high ISO.
However, when using 35-100mm lens, the picture quality is better than 24-70mm (of course I should not make a comparision for two different focal lengths), If there is a chance and have a look between two pictures, you can tell the difference between two pictures.
24-70mm with D700 and SB-800 gives a feel of real environment with beautiful bokeh. Photo is a bit sharp.
35-100mm with E-510 and FL50 gives a feel of dream with fantasy. Photos is a bit soft. It is suitable for wedding at church.
I found that no camera is perfect. First of all, the E-510 with CCD vibration can be used up to 1/5 sec using 14-50mm at ISO 400. But D700 used 1/20 at ISO 1600 cannot give steady picture since there was no vibration reduction and the shutter speed must be higher than 1/20. A tripod must be used and there was no bragain.
On the other hand D700 can take indoor photos without flash and ISO is very useful at 3200. I can say D700 ISO 3200 = ISO 400 of E-510.
Below is my feeling which might be not widely accepted by others.
The 24-70mm lens using D700 can provide shadow depth of field and indoor photos in which the olympus can only attain using longer focal length with large aperture. This is the main reason for using full-frame together with low noise at high ISO.
However, when using 35-100mm lens, the picture quality is better than 24-70mm (of course I should not make a comparision for two different focal lengths), If there is a chance and have a look between two pictures, you can tell the difference between two pictures.
24-70mm with D700 and SB-800 gives a feel of real environment with beautiful bokeh. Photo is a bit sharp.
35-100mm with E-510 and FL50 gives a feel of dream with fantasy. Photos is a bit soft. It is suitable for wedding at church.
