Nikon D700

評測報告

實拍照片

1. Full frame can give shadow depth of field using shorter focal length
2 Auotfocus is fast and reliable
3. White balance is accurate
4. 5ps was enough for me
5. Dust does not stick to CMOS
6. ISO is useable up to6400
7. Viewfinder is bright and can use manual focus for my pets
8 Body is robust and durable
9. The electronics inside is also reliable
10. No underexposed or overexposed

1. No internal CCD shift vibration reduction
2. Body is heavy
3. 90% viewfinder
4 Picture quality is not so colourful than I expect
5. The built-in flash could not be used 40mm below

When I switch from my E510 with leica 14-50mm and 35-100mm to D700 with 24-70mm.

I found that no camera is perfect. First of all, the E-510 with CCD vibration can be used up to 1/5 sec using 14-50mm at ISO 400. But D700 used 1/20 at ISO 1600 cannot give steady picture since there was no vibration reduction and the shutter speed must be higher than 1/20. A tripod must be used and there was no bragain.

On the other hand D700 can take indoor photos without flash and ISO is very useful at 3200. I can say D700 ISO 3200 = ISO 400 of E-510.

Below is my feeling which might be not widely accepted by others.

The 24-70mm lens using D700 can provide shadow depth of field and indoor photos in which the olympus can only attain using longer focal length with large aperture. This is the main reason for using full-frame together with low noise at high ISO.

However, when using 35-100mm lens, the picture quality is better than 24-70mm (of course I should not make a comparision for two different focal lengths), If there is a chance and have a look between two pictures, you can tell the difference between two pictures.
24-70mm with D700 and SB-800 gives a feel of real environment with beautiful bokeh. Photo is a bit sharp.
35-100mm with E-510 and FL50 gives a feel of dream with fantasy. Photos is a bit soft. It is suitable for wedding at church.

1) AF very fast
2) 有內閃, 但我d80 也有
3) White balance is accurate around 80% of the time.
4) ISO 3200-6400 still usable to normal people
5) 3' LCD with liveview is very useful
6) have dust removal function.
7) AI-s lens can use A and M mode
8) 5 FPS without using MB-10

1) It is quite heavy
I have 17-35 f2.8, 70-300VR on D700, long time around the neck, it is quite stressing
I recommend, using some cheaper, lighter zoom lens in normal shooting conditions

2) battery used up quicker than D80
3) Not support for SD card

Upgrade from D80, it feels like driving a Civic vs a Porsche, impossible to compare, it is kind of like light years ahead of D80

1) 2010年1月 - 今日仍然勝價比超高兼超班, 當今世上DSLR 數碼單鏡反光機影像質素能與NIKON D700比較甚至優勝(不計FILM機), 應不多於3部了.

1) 機身同造工可更上一層樓;
2) 今時今日能多拍片功能點都好些.

1) 全功能FF機, 專業機身
2) 全幅面感光元面積應比APS-C Size 大近3倍; 影像優勢, 解析度同雜訊可想而知.
3) 顏色自然
4) Nikon品質有保證

1, 二萬元以內第一部Full Flame機 (D3, D3X均三萬元以上!)
2, 對焦相當快!
3, 具備機頂燈(雖然不常用), 而同級對手Canon 5d mark ll 則沒有!
4, 配上sb800 / sb900, 測光非常準確
5, noise control比D300大躍進! iso6400也keep到
6, auto white balance發展很成熟, 已能應付絕大部份場景, 最重要是可以令顏色, 光暗度和飽和度得以完整展示

1, view finder不是100%, 令攞景需要時間適應
2, buffer不夠快, 遠不及d3
3, 機身比較重 (凈機身已重達1.2kg!), 比5d mark ll還要重! 長時間使用會很累!
4, 底座容易花 (或許是使用物料所致?)

由Nikon用家upgrade上來, 可以很快就適應, 起初以為它是D300的full flame版, 但原來不是, D700不單是D300的FF版那麼簡單! 前者內裏不少功能均比後者upgrade了, 升級了和快了! 而價錢卻只是多幾千元, 功能卻與價值近3萬元的D3相若, 它的性價比可說是相當高

優點已經有好多師兄講哂。
但有一項一定要提，就係Nikon機身一向耐操，可靠性非常高。

配件：DK-17好易整花，我買左幾日，就因為手多多整花左。
　　　而且佢係用收螺絲的方式裝拆，費時失事，而且容易唔見。
　　　如果用返好似Canon高階機身的觀景器會比較理想。

買之前硬係有人都話D700像素低，又冇拍片功能，唔低玩。

無錯，多一個function，每個人都好想要。
不過我自問對拍片冇咩興趣，加上$17400個價非常合理。
強悍的對焦及追焦能力、ISO的表現及細膩的畫質，其他品牌又比到你幾多？
高像素幾高又如何？我根本用唔著。
所以，我覺得依個價係超值。

而且新機肯定做到$20000以上的價位，咁你會唔會考慮？
依家D700係我手，影多幾張相，已經值回票價。

ISO up to 4000 still can be use.
51 focus point better than competitor.
Add MB-10 Plus D3 battery can up to 9FPS.
Focusing is a bit faster than D300.

The View Finder is not 100% , Cannot get the accurate composition. other than that is perfect .

I have been using for 6 months , the camera is very solid build and the ISO is very impressive me even I am shooting in low light enviroment . going to upgrade D3s
hope can share something in the near future.

The Price compare to D300 or D300s is not that much , so I encourage people
who want to upgrade from D90 / D80 .... can jump to D700. save your time and money.
,because FX is future format camera.