有FF,可以用番舊款Nikon鏡！

少許重及二萬多元如二萬樓下就最好.

跟D300只有少許分別. 但有FF最正！

Good overall quality and, becasue of full frame, can be used for years, I hope.

No innovative features or photo quality imporvement over D300. New customers are not satisfied and it's priced too high in this case.

D300 is supprisingly better than older Nikon cameras and D700 is having similar quality but in full frame. Less impact to buyers as it's similar or too close to D300 but nearly doubled in price. Good choice if you have money to spend. :-(

手感比起D300好,對焦快,影景一流,色彩表現得好,是一部輕便式的FULL FRAME機。

價錢貴,花巧功能多,外觀設計上冇改變(差不多部部Nikon機都一樣樣) 。

用過後覺得D300比它好用一些。

Spec and tech high end, too good!
Shutter sound much better than D300! Fast!
Very high definition display, sharp as close as the picture in monitor!
No need Ps, go straight!
Pro feel!
Try to change lens to find different! (also weak point too)

Heavy! If carrying with 20-700, you will get tired in 3~5 shots!
I like D300 handle better. (May be I have a big hand)

I brought the D700 in the first day in the market and brought three lens as well, 70-200, 24-70 and 105. I have expressed the first two lens already and will tell you some more about 105 later.
Many people like to compare D700 Vs 5D because Canon only this one is very close to D700 in FF. Honestly speaking, it is not quite right and cruel comparison, because today's technology is much high than two years ago. But I would like to say: D700 is a total winner.
My feeling is Nikon did a very good job in this D700 FF, although someone said Nikon is rush to the market for Olympic game but I feel very positive in pricing and timing in this camera. If Nikon fans like to get change, I recommend to try D700 FF, it will let you feel different - it just like you have another lens.
When you have it you will always try to shoot.
I hope we can see Canon's new FF in the market to compete with Nikon FF

控掣一切跟D300相同
影像好(景深特別好)
對焦快

貴 及 重
LV 仍需改善

影像質素並不是DX系列的檔次,出RAW編修的話影像質素其實已經沒有太多話要說了
機能及技術上已達到該級別極致的水平
對焦速度和準度都很優
手感及做工精良紮實,配合MB-D10整體外觀更顯專業
反應及連拍速度都很快
能貼心照顧有各類Nikkor(包括DX)鏡的用家,提供全面的支援
個人覺得200~6400都是可用的工作ISO
INFO鍵和機頂閃其實在"某些時刻"來說是很方便的,有入門機的親切感覺XD

在該價位段未有相應的鏡頭群配合(如C家5D的F4三寶)
四周影像較鬆散和軟弱,尤其使用大光圈鏡時(這應該是全片幅傳感器的先天問題)
預設JPG直出整體較5D稍弱一點點(tone, sharpness),建議出NEF再編修或將銳度調高2~3級

整體操作上不錯,機能上幾乎是一台體積少了一點的D3
很明顯市場上的比較對象就只有5D,但各有優勢
5D目前在價格,鏡頭群及影像質素上都佔優
而D700的機能及各項先進技術上都佔優

一.如果你本身在C和N兩大系統中選擇並且想一頭紮進入門Full Frame級別的話
我建議等5D的後繼機種

二.若果你是N家的用家, 好好運用你手上的機器

三.至於本身是C家,請參閱一

Enjoy FX simlar to D3 performance, but less ~$10000.

Easy to carry than D3, good for semi-Pro.

Exspensive compare with D300, but still worth to buy for nikon old fans! All the old lens are supported!

Good machine we expected for a long time!

Made in Japan
Full frame
Cheaper than D3
Built in flash so don't need to carry SB 800 all the time

Expensive
Need more time to find it out

This is a dream body for a lot Nikon fans, however the price is not friendly yet. About people compare it to 5D, I am sure D700 will be much better. Hope people come here to share their objective experience and not to to be picky because they are jealous.

多花巧野
你要話佢好過d200 D300都得。貴咁多。緊好啦。

但係講到同級比我真係會拎5D比。
一比就係垃圾

影相真係想影完張相靚０者。
唔係拎部機出唻威嘛
佢唔夠好囉

咁既價錢唻講。。垃圾
等咁耐先有nikon 既Full Frame
除左多左d新既花巧功能外
講返基本影相想要既。就係影張靚相。

又係果句。咁既價錢唻講。。垃圾
直頭跟唔到5D既質素，灰晒。
要比可以拎幾年前既Kodak Pro SLR/n

同埋想佢無機頂燈囉。
呢個只係我死板既諗法
無機頂燈既先叫得做好d既相機。

比較平既全幅機﹐解放鏡頭
唔係連機身直倒﹐比 D3 flexible
可用 DX 同 FX 鏡
手感一流
高 ISO 畫質都好掂
有內閃 (雖然個人覺得無用...)
Made in Japan (雖然 Made in Thailand 既品質都好好)

重﹐接近 1kg﹐唔適合旅遊用
稍為貴左D﹐行貨價差唔多係 D300 既一倍
White Balance 都係唔掂...

同 D300 感覺相似﹐機身高少少﹐同明顯重D
buttons 分佈既設計亦同 D300 相同
加上直倒﹐連拍速度同 D300 一樣
機頂既 LCD 比 D300 細少少
一部萬眾其待既平價全幅機﹐出黎既定價唔係真係咁 "平價"... 有D失望 ^^"