T* coating 無敵
光學結構好
相片質數真係好好 f2.8可用
散景真係有蔡味
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
頭重尾輕 驚爆mount
防水滴防塵欠奉
防水滴防塵欠奉
評價:
我係由nikon d300s 轉行雙修sony+nikon
現代蔡司鏡吾可以同古代比...
我用落sony body係無nikon/canon禁好，iso、 white balance、對焦系統全部吾夠人好
只係勝在鏡頭光學表現真係超曬班！求靚相已經足夠有餘，好多人睇完相都嘩一聲！反差，顏色，散景，變形控制都好好！
ZA24-70與N17-55同N24-70 一比之下，我只可以講我要蔡司
現代蔡司鏡吾可以同古代比...
我用落sony body係無nikon/canon禁好，iso、 white balance、對焦系統全部吾夠人好
只係勝在鏡頭光學表現真係超曬班！求靚相已經足夠有餘，好多人睇完相都嘩一聲！反差，顏色，散景，變形控制都好好！
ZA24-70與N17-55同N24-70 一比之下，我只可以講我要蔡司
優點:
F2.8 大光圈,
對焦快(A700)
成像銳利
蔡司散景迷人,色彩獨特
影人一流,
唔算貴
對焦快(A700)
成像銳利
蔡司散景迷人,色彩獨特
影人一流,
唔算貴
缺點:
重左少少啦(但係我鐘意)
評價:
我用過canon 40d+ sigma 24-70hsm, 對焦都係sony a700+24-70za 快D
之前驚同16-80za 差唔多, 但係果然貴6000就係貴6000, 散景係24-70za贏晒的,
色彩好似淡過16-80(唔識睇), 不過真實D
重呀!!!! 我以前用16-80影1xxx 張都仲ok, 但係用24-70影左4xx 隻手已經有D痛,
我用過canon, nikon, 我都係鐘意sony,
無買錯!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
之前驚同16-80za 差唔多, 但係果然貴6000就係貴6000, 散景係24-70za贏晒的,
色彩好似淡過16-80(唔識睇), 不過真實D
重呀!!!! 我以前用16-80影1xxx 張都仲ok, 但係用24-70影左4xx 隻手已經有D痛,
我用過canon, nikon, 我都係鐘意sony,
無買錯!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
優點:
1. 成像銳利
2. 用全片幅机上這焦段很實用 , 還有F/2.8大光圈
3. 鏡身用料不【馬虎】
4. 流著【蔡司】獨特的色彩
5. T * 超凡鍍鏌坐鎮信得過
6. 想玩【蔡司】鏡又要有自動對焦幫助，只此一家別無它選了！
2. 用全片幅机上這焦段很實用 , 還有F/2.8大光圈
3. 鏡身用料不【馬虎】
4. 流著【蔡司】獨特的色彩
5. T * 超凡鍍鏌坐鎮信得過
6. 想玩【蔡司】鏡又要有自動對焦幫助，只此一家別無它選了！
缺點:
1. 不是【IF】令用家增加不便
2. 不能和A850在嚴峻的環境上出生入死，因無防塵水滴的設計
3. 多人選購下下都要定貨【等】
2. 不能和A850在嚴峻的環境上出生入死，因無防塵水滴的設計
3. 多人選購下下都要定貨【等】
評價:
小弟用開CANON 的器材，好向往蔡司的味力，因而初進身之階，用後它可給我Nikon 和Canon 兩者的優點在一身，層次感優良色彩豐富，是一支好鏡值得花錢.......買＊
優點:
Sharp , precise focus , 還原度高 , 層次感豐富 , 外型高貴
缺點:
對焦不算非常快 , 但此說有點不公平 , 因為只能mount 在sony 機身 , 而sony本身不及canon 快
評價:
影portrait 很好 , 影風景的話不夠wide, 但針無兩頭利 , 影portrait呢支最好 , 影景就16 -35mm 那支
有蔡司鏡的特色 , 但硬要跟contax 年代的蔡司鏡比當然是兩回事, 菲林的感染力比數碼化的相片一定強一點 , 但以追求高解像的年代來說此鏡已是無懈可擊
配上a850 用已經很好 , 比起 5D M2 加L 鏡絕不會輸 , 反之有一點獨特的味道不是CANON 和NIKKOR 鏡所能做到 , 而且機連鏡的價錢絕對比其他同級品牌吸引
有蔡司鏡的特色 , 但硬要跟contax 年代的蔡司鏡比當然是兩回事, 菲林的感染力比數碼化的相片一定強一點 , 但以追求高解像的年代來說此鏡已是無懈可擊
配上a850 用已經很好 , 比起 5D M2 加L 鏡絕不會輸 , 反之有一點獨特的味道不是CANON 和NIKKOR 鏡所能做到 , 而且機連鏡的價錢絕對比其他同級品牌吸引
優點:
1. Very good craftsmanship;
2. Fast focusing;
3. High speed focusing;
4. High contrast; and
5. Short zoom distance, fast zoom.
2. Fast focusing;
3. High speed focusing;
4. High contrast; and
5. Short zoom distance, fast zoom.
缺點:
1. Heavy, even heavier than my Minolta 80-200mm f/2.8;
2. Maybe not a real 24mm in compare with my Minolta 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5, it can be 26mm most likely;
3, Tight zoom ring; and
4, "Space" on the mount.
2. Maybe not a real 24mm in compare with my Minolta 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5, it can be 26mm most likely;
3, Tight zoom ring; and
4, "Space" on the mount.
評價:
It is a very good lens in term of image standard; but please don't mix-up with "real" Carl Zeiss lens. As Sony stated that the Zeiss T* coating was added, and it has been made upto Zeiss standard.
Remember old days shooting experience with a real Zeiss and Fuji Provia in studio, I have to say these lens are only a bit better than Minolta lens in old days.
By the way, I think the lens are "upgrade" design from the Minolta AF 28-70 f/2.8 (not the 28-75 in 7D days); you may refer to a famous Germany website that the lens elements & groups are very similar. And, I think it is not wide angle enough as at the 24mm end, it provides only a tiny wider than 28mm.
Remember old days shooting experience with a real Zeiss and Fuji Provia in studio, I have to say these lens are only a bit better than Minolta lens in old days.
By the way, I think the lens are "upgrade" design from the Minolta AF 28-70 f/2.8 (not the 28-75 in 7D days); you may refer to a famous Germany website that the lens elements & groups are very similar. And, I think it is not wide angle enough as at the 24mm end, it provides only a tiny wider than 28mm.
