very useful zoom range for FF
ok range for 1.3x
IS
展示第 1 - 10 項，共 130 項
優點:
缺點:
not the best range for 1.6x
tele end is better than wide end
tele end is better than wide end
評價:
I bought this lens some 5 years ago. At that time, it was the 'cheapest' L lens with IS feature. However, the motor broke down once (~ 2yr ago) and had to be replaced/repaired for an extra $2k or so. Nonetheless, I use this lens so often that the cost-per-use is actually lower than say for eg: my Tamron 90mm Macro.
Regarding the lens performance: This lens is a bit soft at F4 in both wide or tele. When downstopped to F5.6, the tele end is much sharper. At F6.3 upwards, the wide end then becomes very sharp. IS feature works as advertised. However, the image is better with IS turned OFF than turned ON. So if you dont need IS, pls turn it OFF.
In fact, 24-105 is the best 'kit' lens in the world because it is bundled with the 5D2. Before the Japanese tsunami, this lens can be had for about $7k, which is an awesome deal! But now, the price of this lens goes back to about $8-9k.
Regarding the lens performance: This lens is a bit soft at F4 in both wide or tele. When downstopped to F5.6, the tele end is much sharper. At F6.3 upwards, the wide end then becomes very sharp. IS feature works as advertised. However, the image is better with IS turned OFF than turned ON. So if you dont need IS, pls turn it OFF.
In fact, 24-105 is the best 'kit' lens in the world because it is bundled with the 5D2. Before the Japanese tsunami, this lens can be had for about $7k, which is an awesome deal! But now, the price of this lens goes back to about $8-9k.
優點:
1. 方便。有人話APSC機會無咁方便。我用7D. 24-105mm 變左38-168mm 比 FF蝕左12mm 唔夠wide. 但長焦多左63mm. 好好用。F4＋IS 晚上或室內都難佢唔到。之前用開tamron支B005， 17﹣50 F2.8 有防震版。室內表現24-105真係全勝。
缺點:
真係貴！！！！要成8千幾。
好難挑骨頭。
好難挑骨頭。
評價:
好好用。一鏡可以走天涯！！
色水， 成像，對焦都無愧L鏡之名！！！
仲要勁方便， 我經常都只帶一支出街。一支搞掂！
我2年前用500D已經用佢。一路到而家7D都仲用緊。
我諗就算遲D再轉5Dmark3, 都會照用
色水， 成像，對焦都無愧L鏡之名！！！
仲要勁方便， 我經常都只帶一支出街。一支搞掂！
我2年前用500D已經用佢。一路到而家7D都仲用緊。
我諗就算遲D再轉5Dmark3, 都會照用
優點:
IS, 24-105超方便,一鏡可走天下(全幅),成像一流,
缺點:
任何焦距都有變形.但比Nikon新鏡24-120mmf4.0VR好,四邊黑角嚴重,
Hood設計不好,鏡筒容易入塵.做工不好,
Hood設計不好,鏡筒容易入塵.做工不好,
評價:
Canon好鏡,f4.0可用,收5.6後影像超好.IS可算這支鏡靈魂.比Canon24-70mm F2.8L要收至f4光圈才可用,真是算好用.鏡頭輕巧,用料不太可靠,
優點:
Value for money. Much less field curvature problem like 24-70 L. Range good enough for daily use (exlcuding the tele range). Very high photo quality for general use. Of course can't compare with pime lens. IS help me to take photos even at 1/5 second.
缺點:
Not good for apsc body. (not wide enogh)
評價:
Very convenient and light weight for FF body. High distortion at 24 mm not an issue after lens correction in software.
優點:
- Good output
- Good range
- Good weight
- Good price
- Good range
- Good weight
- Good price
缺點:
- Really no!
評價:
If you dun buy this lens, you are a fool, cos this lens is the most useful one in the whole range.
最後更新：2010-12-29 16:39:21
優點:
方便,有IS, 24-105range真係好好用
USM 對焦快狠準
相比24-70 f 2.8 輕
發色保持L鏡特色
收光圈到 f6.3以上,同其他高級變焦紅圈分別唔明顯
USM 對焦快狠準
相比24-70 f 2.8 輕
發色保持L鏡特色
收光圈到 f6.3以上,同其他高級變焦紅圈分別唔明顯
缺點:
易入塵,小第支鏡裡面有一粒白色嘅塵,好想整走佢~
新鏡比較貴,買二手低玩d
24mm變型勁
要半按之後等一等,IS起動先按,唔係IS可能無效
如setting已經係安全快門,建議關咗個IS好啲
新鏡比較貴,買二手低玩d
24mm變型勁
要半按之後等一等,IS起動先按,唔係IS可能無效
如setting已經係安全快門,建議關咗個IS好啲
評價:
我用六千大元買左一支二手返嚟餵無敵兔食,方便,質素,價錢好平均
除咗24-105之外,再加三支 ( Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, Sigma 50 f1.4, 小白IS) , 咁就都唔使點樣再買鏡咯~~~除非又屎忽痕啦~~=.=
題外話~~S50.4 我係用450D時候買,當時已經好靚好sharp,衣家插落無敵兔度,嚇我一跳,sharp就不在話下, 啲散景靚到賴屎~誠意推介 (要留意走焦問題)
除咗24-105之外,再加三支 ( Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, Sigma 50 f1.4, 小白IS) , 咁就都唔使點樣再買鏡咯~~~除非又屎忽痕啦~~=.=
題外話~~S50.4 我係用450D時候買,當時已經好靚好sharp,衣家插落無敵兔度,嚇我一跳,sharp就不在話下, 啲散景靚到賴屎~誠意推介 (要留意走焦問題)
優點:
- 輕、價錢便宜（與24-70 f2.8相比）、
- 有IS和防水、防塵。
- 有IS和防水、防塵。
缺點:
- wide angle 表現很差，邊角位有很明顯的鬆散（好像out focus) , 就連APS (1.3)機都很明顯 !
- 申縮鏡，好肉酸。
- 申縮鏡，好肉酸。
評價:
- 整體表現只能剛剛合格！
- tele 比wide angle 好。
- wide angle 如以L鏡來講，可以話很差！
本人用開24-70 f2.8 ，剛轉到24-105 f4, body 則由1d3 轉到5d2,又轉回1d4。
如與 24-70 f2.8 比較,24-70 f2.8 明顯比它好，24-70 2.8 要用到FF機（5D2), 角位最邊最邊，才有少許鬆散(好像out focus)。真是一分錢一分貨。
如果正考慮兩支鏡(24-70 f2.8 24-105 f4)， 應買那支，又無budget問題，一定是24-70 f2.8 ！
- tele 比wide angle 好。
- wide angle 如以L鏡來講，可以話很差！
本人用開24-70 f2.8 ，剛轉到24-105 f4, body 則由1d3 轉到5d2,又轉回1d4。
如與 24-70 f2.8 比較,24-70 f2.8 明顯比它好，24-70 2.8 要用到FF機（5D2), 角位最邊最邊，才有少許鬆散(好像out focus)。真是一分錢一分貨。
如果正考慮兩支鏡(24-70 f2.8 24-105 f4)， 應買那支，又無budget問題，一定是24-70 f2.8 ！
最後更新：2010-10-26 11:02:26
優點:
- 距離算係好好
- 70-105呢個距離,24-70真係做唔到架尼。
- 唔係大火圈大晒
- 70-105呢個距離,24-70真係做唔到架尼。
- 唔係大火圈大晒
缺點:
- 申縮鏡。。真係好肉酸，我諗佢係外型最酸既L鏡
評價:
用左都幾年。準備放左佢，情義結，要評下佢
有冇IS，呢個距離根本無所謂，咁耐都無用過IS，佢無IS平幾舊我都制
IS搞到你影相唔順暢，條氣仲唔順
唔係大光圈大晒。
唔係懶得行多兩步影遠d，而係個畫面入面既野比例係完全唔同。
2470做唔到就係做唔到
但係個樣真係輸晒，支鏡用耐左成日好似流口水咁sir個鏡頭出唻
外表真係低能到爆炸
有冇IS，呢個距離根本無所謂，咁耐都無用過IS，佢無IS平幾舊我都制
IS搞到你影相唔順暢，條氣仲唔順
唔係大光圈大晒。
唔係懶得行多兩步影遠d，而係個畫面入面既野比例係完全唔同。
2470做唔到就係做唔到
但係個樣真係輸晒，支鏡用耐左成日好似流口水咁sir個鏡頭出唻
外表真係低能到爆炸
優點:
手感好,有IS
恆定f.4都好好用
色靚,無乜偏色
恆定f.4都好好用
色靚,無乜偏色
缺點:
個遮光罩都幾易花
評價:
24-105用係1.6機真係好用方便
一支越用越好用鏡頭
真係久唔久比到驚喜你
日頭日白出街影相真係無走雞
夜晚室內加支燈又係無走雞
我有支小白,有支S50.4
整整下都少帶佢地出街喇
一支越用越好用鏡頭
真係久唔久比到驚喜你
日頭日白出街影相真係無走雞
夜晚室內加支燈又係無走雞
我有支小白,有支S50.4
整整下都少帶佢地出街喇
優點:
1) L鏡造工扎實
2) 雖然只有恆定4光圈, 但過了70mm後散景仍相當不錯.
3) 焦距廣, 加埋Kenko 1.4x extender, 當天涯鏡用, 一流!!
4) 真係Sharp, 我老婆大人對此鏡十分滿意.
5) 對焦速度, HSM, 不用多說
6) IS 十分好用, 合多個場景
2) 雖然只有恆定4光圈, 但過了70mm後散景仍相當不錯.
3) 焦距廣, 加埋Kenko 1.4x extender, 當天涯鏡用, 一流!!
4) 真係Sharp, 我老婆大人對此鏡十分滿意.
5) 對焦速度, HSM, 不用多說
6) IS 十分好用, 合多個場景
缺點:
1) 如果有LOCK鏡掣就好D (成日唔覺意拉長左支鏡)
2) 感覺再輕d會好d (去旅行陀住都有d重)
3) 個鏡袋真係有D不知所謂(我用開sigma, 起碼人地d EX 鏡都有個稍為似樣D的袋.)
4) 個HOOD都幾易花
2) 感覺再輕d會好d (去旅行陀住都有d重)
3) 個鏡袋真係有D不知所謂(我用開sigma, 起碼人地d EX 鏡都有個稍為似樣D的袋.)
4) 個HOOD都幾易花
評價:
當初去旅行, 想在此鏡同Sigma 18-250做個選擇, 最後決定了此鏡, 的確無令我失望.
先前有擔心過此鏡焦距不及天涯鏡, 但後來發現, 真係無乜幾可要用到過150mm打後, 再者, 只要加個1.4x extender便可解決這問題, 所以, 最後連支買左無耐的天涯鏡也要放走(怕再遲些賣唔去就煩).
雖然這支係FF鏡, 但我用在550D依然可以好開心的影, 絕無話因要擔心乘大1.6的問題, 講真, 如果APSC用家真係要Wide, 是但加支Ultrawide都得(針真係無兩頭利, 無可能又要Wide, 又要夠Tele, 又要大光圈).
此鏡真係"居家旅行"必備之選.
先前有擔心過此鏡焦距不及天涯鏡, 但後來發現, 真係無乜幾可要用到過150mm打後, 再者, 只要加個1.4x extender便可解決這問題, 所以, 最後連支買左無耐的天涯鏡也要放走(怕再遲些賣唔去就煩).
雖然這支係FF鏡, 但我用在550D依然可以好開心的影, 絕無話因要擔心乘大1.6的問題, 講真, 如果APSC用家真係要Wide, 是但加支Ultrawide都得(針真係無兩頭利, 無可能又要Wide, 又要夠Tele, 又要大光圈).
此鏡真係"居家旅行"必備之選.
