靜, 對焦快, 買左先明白咩叫解放後用法,
利, 色水靚
顯示： 25 - 30 (最新發表)
優點:
缺點:
重,
77mm filter---貴
zoom時有點緊
77mm filter---貴
zoom時有點緊
評價:
基本上真係幾好, 各方便都做到我要求
不過試鏡係旺角某廣場總共3間試左成最少9支先得1支ok, 但都有少少塵,
吹一吹就冇左, 局住要-.-
不過用後覺得冇買錯, 雖然用左2次, 因為我會用黎長插, 所以都冇得話咩唔好,
咁既價錢可以買到支二手17-40, 不過光圈又唔夠大, 所以都係呢支~
不過試鏡係旺角某廣場總共3間試左成最少9支先得1支ok, 但都有少少塵,
吹一吹就冇左, 局住要-.-
不過用後覺得冇買錯, 雖然用左2次, 因為我會用黎長插, 所以都冇得話咩唔好,
咁既價錢可以買到支二手17-40, 不過光圈又唔夠大, 所以都係呢支~
優點:
Great Range
Pretty handy
Large Aperture F2.8
Sharp image quality
Really great start up lens for beginner
Great price brought at $4880 DCFever
Made in Japan
It has OS
The HSM is fairly quiet
Pretty handy
Large Aperture F2.8
Sharp image quality
Really great start up lens for beginner
Great price brought at $4880 DCFever
Made in Japan
It has OS
The HSM is fairly quiet
缺點:
Not much
評價:
Have to be fair to this lens first, because it offer everything in a cheap price and this is a lens for people who wanted to get a good image quality in a reasonable price in addition to that what sigma did to this lens has truly show how much effort they have developed this product to consumer. In my viewpoint of this lens, is that it is one of the best cheap alternative to get good image quality, and i strongly suggest anyone who want to start photography do not go for the kits set, because those kits lens won't work for long and is a bit of a waste of money, meanwhile as you progress in photography why don't you just buy a basic body and spend a little bit more on the lens, because in the future you will going to want a better lens, so why not this lens for a starter as it offer everything you need.
I m currently using Nikon D300s, i know that Nikon has it own 1755 F2.8 as well and also cost twice of this lens and produce excellent image quality, but however it can not be use for future upgrade for FF camera, so is a bit of wasting money, for myself i rather to spend that amount of money to get this sigma lens and the new Nikon 28mm F1.8G or even the Nikon 85mm F1.8G, because this could offer anybody to learn more by master those equipment in early stages, true fact is that expensive equipment won't buy you skills, it depends on how you use it. And this lens won't disappoint you at all. And all this could apply to anyone who use different brand cameras.
I m currently using Nikon D300s, i know that Nikon has it own 1755 F2.8 as well and also cost twice of this lens and produce excellent image quality, but however it can not be use for future upgrade for FF camera, so is a bit of wasting money, for myself i rather to spend that amount of money to get this sigma lens and the new Nikon 28mm F1.8G or even the Nikon 85mm F1.8G, because this could offer anybody to learn more by master those equipment in early stages, true fact is that expensive equipment won't buy you skills, it depends on how you use it. And this lens won't disappoint you at all. And all this could apply to anyone who use different brand cameras.
優點:
焦段實用
2.8光圈一流
發色正.有電影feel
f2.8中間成像好sharp
二手4000蚊買入超抵用
2.8光圈一流
發色正.有電影feel
f2.8中間成像好sharp
二手4000蚊買入超抵用
缺點:
摩打無想像中咁快
防手震無想像中咁好
防手震無想像中咁好
評價:
本人之前是用canon 60D+s17-70 hsm的.因走焦和防手震差而換左c15-85..雖然15-85的防手震,usm,,成像,同24mm wide都一流..但係一到晚上光圈細既問題就即時出現...因為主要都係拍片多,,之前問朋友借過支s17-50 EX DC OS HSM 黎玩..就即刻決定要換走支15-85...所以造就左今次換成s17-50 EX DC OS HSM
成像SHARP,,,發色一流.
佢既2.8大光圈真係正..景深淺..拍片影大頭好正.
只係要接受佢既對焦速度,防手震,無canon咁快咁勁.
之前唸過直上17-55..因太貴而打消念頭
二手買返黎無走焦..應該是好彩..
建議要買二手既朋友一定要搵D仲有保養..CAL鏡都無咁麻煩
比我再簡既我只係想買過支全新的
成像SHARP,,,發色一流.
佢既2.8大光圈真係正..景深淺..拍片影大頭好正.
只係要接受佢既對焦速度,防手震,無canon咁快咁勁.
之前唸過直上17-55..因太貴而打消念頭
二手買返黎無走焦..應該是好彩..
建議要買二手既朋友一定要搵D仲有保養..CAL鏡都無咁麻煩
比我再簡既我只係想買過支全新的
最後更新：2012-06-22 00:17:10
優點:
二手價4K 左右算OK抵
range 在APSC 實用.
防震good.
range 在APSC 實用.
防震good.
缺點:
不能上FF.
17mm 段都係壓扁你3000. 影人最好企後D用24......
tokina 116 wide 既感覺好過呢枝既17.
17mm 段都係壓扁你3000. 影人最好企後D用24......
tokina 116 wide 既感覺好過呢枝既17.
評價:
色水靚, 影出黎有d 立體感. 有種L 鏡的感覺. 防震都好掂, 我的手持極限不超過1/30 秒以內都OK.
由550D 因upgrade 5D II , 短短的一個月使用生涯, 枝鏡跟唔到我上FF, 真係好可惜. 而家用17-40, 錢就比多左, 但色水無sigma 呢枝鮮. 頗為失望.
由550D 因upgrade 5D II , 短短的一個月使用生涯, 枝鏡跟唔到我上FF, 真係好可惜. 而家用17-40, 錢就比多左, 但色水無sigma 呢枝鮮. 頗為失望.
最後更新：2012-05-23 04:58:38
優點:
光圈有成f-2.8，點都唔算細。
恆定光圈。
整體成像，包括銳利度、反差、眩光控制等唔錯。
有HSM對焦快。
金屬Mount（如果你有爆Mount嘅經驗，就知點解啲人咁鐘意金屬Mount）。
日本製造。
有埋鏡身防震。
送埋原廠Hood。
恆定光圈。
整體成像，包括銳利度、反差、眩光控制等唔錯。
有HSM對焦快。
金屬Mount（如果你有爆Mount嘅經驗，就知點解啲人咁鐘意金屬Mount）。
日本製造。
有埋鏡身防震。
送埋原廠Hood。
缺點:
f-2.8嘅成像唔係太Sharp。
無全時手動。
Wide Angle時小小變型。
無全時手動。
Wide Angle時小小變型。
評價:
用開枝Pentax DAL 18-55mm f4-5.6 Kit，嫌佢個光圈唔夠大，眩光又勁同埋唔多夠Sharp。
買咗呢枝嘢之後先知，原來之Kit嘅Sharpness一啲都唔差，如果Sigma開到f-2.8，同枝Kit嘅f-4一比即輸；如果大家都係f-4，就打平，最多俾你Sigma贏少少。又或者倒返轉頭嚟講，Pentax枝Kit喺Sharpness方面一啲都唔失禮。不過眩光控制方面，Sigma就真係好過枝Kit好多！影夜景嗰時唔會一達二達光印。
鏡身防震對我嚟講麻麻，因為部機身巳經有咗防震，而我嘅習慣，甚少依賴防震，一係手持，一係索性上腳架！
對我嚟講，其實冇HSM重好過！第一、我主要用嚟影人、影景，對焦根本唔使太快。二、有HSM反而有走焦情況，調完都冇用，就算用Live View（Contrast Measuring Method）去對，喺100%夠光之下，平均對焦3次，先有一下中焦。跟住先先發覺，應該係Kx控制鏡鸒摩打（HSM）嗰部份有Bug，早一個Model部km根本就冇控制鏡身摩打嘅能力，kx就好似搭豬骨加上去！試過用其它啲冇鏡身摩打嘅Lens，Sigma好、Tamron好，通通就冇事！
有啲人話係相容問題，但我始終都覺得有Bug嘅可能性都好高！就以閃燈為例，我有兩原廠Pentax嘅AF 360閃燈，用喺某啲Model就勁Over，用喺kx就勁Under，唔係淨我一個架，Forum個個都有同一個問題架！所以我信就算買原廠Lens，只要係用鏡身摩打，一樣賴嘢！呢個亦係其中一個點解我要轉會嘅原因！
買咗A55，轉咗去Sony，如果同A55枝Kit比，就邊方面都贏9條街！
買咗呢枝嘢之後先知，原來之Kit嘅Sharpness一啲都唔差，如果Sigma開到f-2.8，同枝Kit嘅f-4一比即輸；如果大家都係f-4，就打平，最多俾你Sigma贏少少。又或者倒返轉頭嚟講，Pentax枝Kit喺Sharpness方面一啲都唔失禮。不過眩光控制方面，Sigma就真係好過枝Kit好多！影夜景嗰時唔會一達二達光印。
鏡身防震對我嚟講麻麻，因為部機身巳經有咗防震，而我嘅習慣，甚少依賴防震，一係手持，一係索性上腳架！
對我嚟講，其實冇HSM重好過！第一、我主要用嚟影人、影景，對焦根本唔使太快。二、有HSM反而有走焦情況，調完都冇用，就算用Live View（Contrast Measuring Method）去對，喺100%夠光之下，平均對焦3次，先有一下中焦。跟住先先發覺，應該係Kx控制鏡鸒摩打（HSM）嗰部份有Bug，早一個Model部km根本就冇控制鏡身摩打嘅能力，kx就好似搭豬骨加上去！試過用其它啲冇鏡身摩打嘅Lens，Sigma好、Tamron好，通通就冇事！
有啲人話係相容問題，但我始終都覺得有Bug嘅可能性都好高！就以閃燈為例，我有兩原廠Pentax嘅AF 360閃燈，用喺某啲Model就勁Over，用喺kx就勁Under，唔係淨我一個架，Forum個個都有同一個問題架！所以我信就算買原廠Lens，只要係用鏡身摩打，一樣賴嘢！呢個亦係其中一個點解我要轉會嘅原因！
買咗A55，轉咗去Sony，如果同A55枝Kit比，就邊方面都贏9條街！
優點:
支鏡真正既微距功能 要用MF去解封~ 好有用
D色水幾好~散景都幾靚
無走焦真係GOOD
D色水幾好~散景都幾靚
無走焦真係GOOD
缺點:
17MM邊緣位~比較差 ~收到去F5.6 都係咁 ~要F8先接受到
個防震 唔係咁堅 都係 CANON 既 IS 勁D
個防震 唔係咁堅 都係 CANON 既 IS 勁D
評價:
支鏡最靚 在28-35MM 左右最利 反而17MM 最差 ,
解封後既50MM 微距~好堅
支鏡全新5K 其實加多1K 買2手既CANON 17-55 F2.8 IS USM 會更好
解封後既50MM 微距~好堅
支鏡全新5K 其實加多1K 買2手既CANON 17-55 F2.8 IS USM 會更好
