鏡皇級黎講平
F2.8
防手震
顯示： 49 - 54 (最新發表)
優點:
Colour is quite accurate indeed
(been seeing reviews regarding to the colour problems of sigma)
Transformation is still very acceptable even at 17mm end
Vignetting is not very much a concern
Overall sharpness is wonderful considering its price
(been seeing reviews regarding to the colour problems of sigma)
Transformation is still very acceptable even at 17mm end
Vignetting is not very much a concern
Overall sharpness is wonderful considering its price
缺點:
Lack of internal focus
Front cap is a bit tricky and can go loose easily
Wondering if the coating is gonna fell off after awhile
OS only compensate like 2 stops instead of 4 but its still very practical on a 17-50mm
(too much os may results in lower image quality)
77mm filter didnt come cheap.
Front cap is a bit tricky and can go loose easily
Wondering if the coating is gonna fell off after awhile
OS only compensate like 2 stops instead of 4 but its still very practical on a 17-50mm
(too much os may results in lower image quality)
77mm filter didnt come cheap.
評價:
At the country i locate the price of this lens is equal to the tamron 17-50 vc and i tried both of it. The overall performance is better the tamron except tamron have a better vc over sigma. However its a funny zoom range of lens, if u wanna go tele u wouldnt have much choices of lens start with 50mm, most good one are start with 70 (70-200, 70-300) so u have a gap between your lens.
優點:
1. 色水靚
2. 收光圈銳利度高
3. 全開光圈散影靚, 感覺比自己支CHEAP CHEAP C50.8 靚
4. 恆定2.8!! 防手震!! HSM!!
5. 造工感覺紮實
6. 送HOOD, 好似之前師兄咁講, 扭到‘咔’一聲, 個HOOP打風都打唔甩
2. 收光圈銳利度高
3. 全開光圈散影靚, 感覺比自己支CHEAP CHEAP C50.8 靚
4. 恆定2.8!! 防手震!! HSM!!
5. 造工感覺紮實
6. 送HOOD, 好似之前師兄咁講, 扭到‘咔’一聲, 個HOOP打風都打唔甩
缺點:
1. $5000大元EX鏡無FTM
2. 手指容易按到對焦環會旋手
3. "感覺" OS比較食電
4. 暗位會迷焦
5. 唔SUPPORT DDP/鏡頭教正 (CANON), 暗角/變形要事後補救, 不過玩得3RD PARTY 就預咗
2. 手指容易按到對焦環會旋手
3. "感覺" OS比較食電
4. 暗位會迷焦
5. 唔SUPPORT DDP/鏡頭教正 (CANON), 暗角/變形要事後補救, 不過玩得3RD PARTY 就預咗
評價:
用緊500D, 想買支恆定2.8影BB, F2.8加防手震, 唔洗開閃燈同推ISO推得太高.
買之前都諗咗好耐, SIGMA 17-50 5千蚊, Tamron A16 $2700/B005 3千幾, CANON EFS 17-55 F2.8要7千幾, 思前想後, 睇咗好多SAMPLE同評價, SIGMA 17-50 係最接近EFS 17-55, 最後都係買喱支..
唔買CANON EFS 17-55 F2.8, 因為唔想用一個紅圈鏡價錢買支APSC鏡, SIGMA 17-50 出現咗, 喱支就變得C/P太低. 將來要轉FF, 不如而家就換支紅圈先. 原廠鏡最好就係保值, 但係要保值, 不如留返D 港紙買人仔
都覺得貴就可以買B005, 但係質數又唔能夠同SIGMA 17-50/EFS 17-55睇齊, 將來要轉FF都重好D, 繼續玩APSC要換鏡唔通又買返SIGMA 17-50/EFS 17-55??
玩過朋友支Tamron A16, 曾經都好想買, 真係平, C/P王!! 可以入多D 人仔, 但係無防手震, 要推ISO, 500D, ISO一高, 張相就粗, 想BB塊面白白滑滑, A16唔係我杯茶
入手SIGMA 17-50, D 相出到黎有驚艷既感覺, 色水好出, 散影靚, 室內F2.8 1/6 都重影到, 即刻覺得5千都值, SIGMA 17-50 係同EFS 17-55比, OS/HSM 己經高A16/B005一班, 塊FLD又高一班, A16/B005 跟本唔係果皮
買喱支我諗都係因為睇中恆定2.8, 希望我既經驗幫到大家選擇
買之前都諗咗好耐, SIGMA 17-50 5千蚊, Tamron A16 $2700/B005 3千幾, CANON EFS 17-55 F2.8要7千幾, 思前想後, 睇咗好多SAMPLE同評價, SIGMA 17-50 係最接近EFS 17-55, 最後都係買喱支..
唔買CANON EFS 17-55 F2.8, 因為唔想用一個紅圈鏡價錢買支APSC鏡, SIGMA 17-50 出現咗, 喱支就變得C/P太低. 將來要轉FF, 不如而家就換支紅圈先. 原廠鏡最好就係保值, 但係要保值, 不如留返D 港紙買人仔
都覺得貴就可以買B005, 但係質數又唔能夠同SIGMA 17-50/EFS 17-55睇齊, 將來要轉FF都重好D, 繼續玩APSC要換鏡唔通又買返SIGMA 17-50/EFS 17-55??
玩過朋友支Tamron A16, 曾經都好想買, 真係平, C/P王!! 可以入多D 人仔, 但係無防手震, 要推ISO, 500D, ISO一高, 張相就粗, 想BB塊面白白滑滑, A16唔係我杯茶
入手SIGMA 17-50, D 相出到黎有驚艷既感覺, 色水好出, 散影靚, 室內F2.8 1/6 都重影到, 即刻覺得5千都值, SIGMA 17-50 係同EFS 17-55比, OS/HSM 己經高A16/B005一班, 塊FLD又高一班, A16/B005 跟本唔係果皮
買喱支我諗都係因為睇中恆定2.8, 希望我既經驗幫到大家選擇
優點:
1. HSM對焦算快且寧靜...
2. 恆定2.8...
3. 抗昡光表現唔錯...最喜歡它的度膜COLOR, 我經常會望~hehe
4. FLD鏡片真的好勁, 影出黎既相雖然係有, 但已經將紫邊減到好低...(要100%先見到)
5. Made In Japan
6. F2.8已經好利...收到F4直頭界手~
7. 防震唔錯~
8. 用料, 手感好過原廠(我係CANON)
2. 恆定2.8...
3. 抗昡光表現唔錯...最喜歡它的度膜COLOR, 我經常會望~hehe
4. FLD鏡片真的好勁, 影出黎既相雖然係有, 但已經將紫邊減到好低...(要100%先見到)
5. Made In Japan
6. F2.8已經好利...收到F4直頭界手~
7. 防震唔錯~
8. 用料, 手感好過原廠(我係CANON)
缺點:
1. 廣角時邊位比較差...不過係廣角通病~
2. 貴為EX鏡竟然無全時手動...
3. 遮光罩真係好鬆...但聽聞後批出的改善左...
4. 對焦時前面既對焦環會轉...經常轉埋我隻手...
5. 仍是用皮, 怕會用久會變色及甩掉, 仲有如果濕左水就煩!
2. 貴為EX鏡竟然無全時手動...
3. 遮光罩真係好鬆...但聽聞後批出的改善左...
4. 對焦時前面既對焦環會轉...經常轉埋我隻手...
5. 仍是用皮, 怕會用久會變色及甩掉, 仲有如果濕左水就煩!
評價:
用左咁耐覺得真係幾好...比較過canon efs17-55同tamron 17-50vc II
無論係造工, 價錢都係SIGMA 17-50 OS Win
造工: Canon EFS 17-55唔洗講, 係人都知表面上佢係一枝鏡頭, 實際上佢係一部吸塵機!
Tamron 17-50 VC II, 造工都好, 不過手感上不太好
對焦: 毫無疑問, 一定係Canon既USM win哂, 又快又靜又有FTM
Sigma第二, 因為有HSM, 不過無FTM, 而且不夠USM快及靜!
Tamron一定輸哂, 又慢又嘈
色彩: Sigma第一, 因為色彩濃郁, 不偏色
Canon第二, 因為色彩較淡
Tamron, 我未用過, 所以唔知~
銳利: Sigma第一, 因為f/2.8已好利
Canon, Tamron唔知, 不過睇test好似都要收一收光圈先利
重量: Canon第一, 最重 645g
Tamron第二 570g
Sigma第三, 最輕 565g
雖然原廠有保值能力, 不過價錢好貴, 又無袋又hood送! 實在買唔落手!
而且近年來Sigma既鏡頭越來越好, 所以我認為係值得推薦!
無論係造工, 價錢都係SIGMA 17-50 OS Win
造工: Canon EFS 17-55唔洗講, 係人都知表面上佢係一枝鏡頭, 實際上佢係一部吸塵機!
Tamron 17-50 VC II, 造工都好, 不過手感上不太好
對焦: 毫無疑問, 一定係Canon既USM win哂, 又快又靜又有FTM
Sigma第二, 因為有HSM, 不過無FTM, 而且不夠USM快及靜!
Tamron一定輸哂, 又慢又嘈
色彩: Sigma第一, 因為色彩濃郁, 不偏色
Canon第二, 因為色彩較淡
Tamron, 我未用過, 所以唔知~
銳利: Sigma第一, 因為f/2.8已好利
Canon, Tamron唔知, 不過睇test好似都要收一收光圈先利
重量: Canon第一, 最重 645g
Tamron第二 570g
Sigma第三, 最輕 565g
雖然原廠有保值能力, 不過價錢好貴, 又無袋又hood送! 實在買唔落手!
而且近年來Sigma既鏡頭越來越好, 所以我認為係值得推薦!
優點:
hsm快
os有用
可全開光圈
色靚
os有用
可全開光圈
色靚
缺點:
17-50的確唔夠用
對焦會旋手
77m uv吧
諗唔到了
對焦會旋手
77m uv吧
諗唔到了
評價:
真係好正
之前係買呢枝同c17-55決擇
但睇番自己又唔係咩有錢仔
都係有平要平算
但平都要有要求
hsm係有料
我買二手 冇走焦
之前支50.4都冇
可能真係進步左
之前係買呢枝同c17-55決擇
但睇番自己又唔係咩有錢仔
都係有平要平算
但平都要有要求
hsm係有料
我買二手 冇走焦
之前支50.4都冇
可能真係進步左
